Evaluation of existing and new methods of tracking glacier terminus change

James M. Lea, Douglas W. F. Mair, Brice R. Rea

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)
11 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Several different methodologies have previously been employed in the tracking of glacier terminus change, though a systematic comparison of these has not been undertaken. The frequent application of single methods to multiple glaciers over large geographical areas such as Greenland, raises the question of whether individual methodologies are robust. In this study we evaluate three existing methodologies that have been widely used to track terminus change (the centre-line, bow and box methods) against a full range of idealized glaciological scenarios and six examples of real glaciers. We also evaluate two new methodologies that aim to reduce measurement error compared with the existing methodologies. The first is a modification to the box method that can account for termini retreating through fjords that change orientation (termed the curvilinear box method), while the second determines the average terminus position relative to the glacier centre line using an inverse distance weighting extrapolation (termed the extrapolated centre-line method). No single method tested achieved complete accuracy for all scenarios, though the extrapolated centre-line method was able to successfully account for variable fjord orientation, width and terminus geometry with the least error.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)323-332
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Glaciology
Volume60
Issue number220
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

glacier
methodology
fjord
evaluation
method
geometry

Keywords

  • glacier calving
  • glacier mapping
  • glaciological instruments and methods

Cite this

Evaluation of existing and new methods of tracking glacier terminus change. / Lea, James M.; Mair, Douglas W. F.; Rea, Brice R.

In: Journal of Glaciology, Vol. 60, No. 220, 2014, p. 323-332.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lea, James M. ; Mair, Douglas W. F. ; Rea, Brice R. / Evaluation of existing and new methods of tracking glacier terminus change. In: Journal of Glaciology. 2014 ; Vol. 60, No. 220. pp. 323-332.
@article{c5ffeb8cfc394f01bdfe05ae30e416e8,
title = "Evaluation of existing and new methods of tracking glacier terminus change",
abstract = "Several different methodologies have previously been employed in the tracking of glacier terminus change, though a systematic comparison of these has not been undertaken. The frequent application of single methods to multiple glaciers over large geographical areas such as Greenland, raises the question of whether individual methodologies are robust. In this study we evaluate three existing methodologies that have been widely used to track terminus change (the centre-line, bow and box methods) against a full range of idealized glaciological scenarios and six examples of real glaciers. We also evaluate two new methodologies that aim to reduce measurement error compared with the existing methodologies. The first is a modification to the box method that can account for termini retreating through fjords that change orientation (termed the curvilinear box method), while the second determines the average terminus position relative to the glacier centre line using an inverse distance weighting extrapolation (termed the extrapolated centre-line method). No single method tested achieved complete accuracy for all scenarios, though the extrapolated centre-line method was able to successfully account for variable fjord orientation, width and terminus geometry with the least error.",
keywords = "glacier calving, glacier mapping, glaciological instruments and methods",
author = "Lea, {James M.} and Mair, {Douglas W. F.} and Rea, {Brice R.}",
note = "ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors thank two anonymous reviewers for constructive comments that helped to improve the manuscript. This research was financially supported by J.M.L.’s PhD funding from UK Natural Environment Research Council grant No. NE/I528742/1.",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.3189/2014JoG13J061",
language = "English",
volume = "60",
pages = "323--332",
journal = "Journal of Glaciology",
issn = "0022-1430",
publisher = "Cambridge Univ. Press.",
number = "220",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of existing and new methods of tracking glacier terminus change

AU - Lea, James M.

AU - Mair, Douglas W. F.

AU - Rea, Brice R.

N1 - ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors thank two anonymous reviewers for constructive comments that helped to improve the manuscript. This research was financially supported by J.M.L.’s PhD funding from UK Natural Environment Research Council grant No. NE/I528742/1.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Several different methodologies have previously been employed in the tracking of glacier terminus change, though a systematic comparison of these has not been undertaken. The frequent application of single methods to multiple glaciers over large geographical areas such as Greenland, raises the question of whether individual methodologies are robust. In this study we evaluate three existing methodologies that have been widely used to track terminus change (the centre-line, bow and box methods) against a full range of idealized glaciological scenarios and six examples of real glaciers. We also evaluate two new methodologies that aim to reduce measurement error compared with the existing methodologies. The first is a modification to the box method that can account for termini retreating through fjords that change orientation (termed the curvilinear box method), while the second determines the average terminus position relative to the glacier centre line using an inverse distance weighting extrapolation (termed the extrapolated centre-line method). No single method tested achieved complete accuracy for all scenarios, though the extrapolated centre-line method was able to successfully account for variable fjord orientation, width and terminus geometry with the least error.

AB - Several different methodologies have previously been employed in the tracking of glacier terminus change, though a systematic comparison of these has not been undertaken. The frequent application of single methods to multiple glaciers over large geographical areas such as Greenland, raises the question of whether individual methodologies are robust. In this study we evaluate three existing methodologies that have been widely used to track terminus change (the centre-line, bow and box methods) against a full range of idealized glaciological scenarios and six examples of real glaciers. We also evaluate two new methodologies that aim to reduce measurement error compared with the existing methodologies. The first is a modification to the box method that can account for termini retreating through fjords that change orientation (termed the curvilinear box method), while the second determines the average terminus position relative to the glacier centre line using an inverse distance weighting extrapolation (termed the extrapolated centre-line method). No single method tested achieved complete accuracy for all scenarios, though the extrapolated centre-line method was able to successfully account for variable fjord orientation, width and terminus geometry with the least error.

KW - glacier calving

KW - glacier mapping

KW - glaciological instruments and methods

U2 - 10.3189/2014JoG13J061

DO - 10.3189/2014JoG13J061

M3 - Article

VL - 60

SP - 323

EP - 332

JO - Journal of Glaciology

JF - Journal of Glaciology

SN - 0022-1430

IS - 220

ER -