Event related potentials reveal that increasing perceptual load leads to increased responses for target stimuli and decreased responses for irrelevant stimuli

Chris Rorden, Chiara Guerrini, Rachel Swainson, Marco Lazzeri, Gordon C. Baylis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Lavie (1995) have suggested that perceptual processing is infl uenced by perceptual load. Specifi cally, relevant information receives additional processing in high load situations exhausting the available capacity. On the other hand, irrelevant information receives less processing with increasing load on a relevant task, as there is a reduced amount of residual processing available. Rees et al. (1997) provided the fi rst physiological evidence for this model, showing this pattern in a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Likewise, Handy et al. (2001) offered supporting evidence measuring event related potentials (ERPs). Both of these studies presented irrelevant information in peripheral vision. Here we manipulated load while using the identical stimuli and the same task (a peripheral gap judgment task) with centrally presented irrelevant stimuli. ERPs show the pattern predicted by Lavie and colleagues, specifi cally for the N1 component. This work offers further evidence that visual attention modulates relatively early processing of perceptual information. Specifi cally, increasing load resulted in stronger N1 responses to relevant information and weaker N1 responses to irrelevant information.

Original languageEnglish
Article number4
JournalFrontiers in Human Neuroscience
Volume2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 22 May 2008

Keywords

  • human
  • perception
  • spatial attention
  • perceptual load
  • selective attention
  • visual-attention
  • extrastriate
  • distractors
  • mechanism
  • color

Cite this

Event related potentials reveal that increasing perceptual load leads to increased responses for target stimuli and decreased responses for irrelevant stimuli. / Rorden, Chris; Guerrini, Chiara; Swainson, Rachel; Lazzeri, Marco; Baylis, Gordon C.

In: Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, Vol. 2, 4, 22.05.2008.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3f05e92858984f4faf1fdee46041cd38,
title = "Event related potentials reveal that increasing perceptual load leads to increased responses for target stimuli and decreased responses for irrelevant stimuli",
abstract = "Lavie (1995) have suggested that perceptual processing is infl uenced by perceptual load. Specifi cally, relevant information receives additional processing in high load situations exhausting the available capacity. On the other hand, irrelevant information receives less processing with increasing load on a relevant task, as there is a reduced amount of residual processing available. Rees et al. (1997) provided the fi rst physiological evidence for this model, showing this pattern in a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Likewise, Handy et al. (2001) offered supporting evidence measuring event related potentials (ERPs). Both of these studies presented irrelevant information in peripheral vision. Here we manipulated load while using the identical stimuli and the same task (a peripheral gap judgment task) with centrally presented irrelevant stimuli. ERPs show the pattern predicted by Lavie and colleagues, specifi cally for the N1 component. This work offers further evidence that visual attention modulates relatively early processing of perceptual information. Specifi cally, increasing load resulted in stronger N1 responses to relevant information and weaker N1 responses to irrelevant information.",
keywords = "human, perception, spatial attention, perceptual load, selective attention, visual-attention, extrastriate, distractors, mechanism, color",
author = "Chris Rorden and Chiara Guerrini and Rachel Swainson and Marco Lazzeri and Baylis, {Gordon C.}",
note = "This Document is Protected by copyright and was first published by Frontiers. All rights reserved. It is reproduced with permission.",
year = "2008",
month = "5",
day = "22",
doi = "10.3389/neuro.09.004.2008",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
journal = "Frontiers in Human Neuroscience",
issn = "1662-5161",
publisher = "Frontiers Media S.A.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Event related potentials reveal that increasing perceptual load leads to increased responses for target stimuli and decreased responses for irrelevant stimuli

AU - Rorden, Chris

AU - Guerrini, Chiara

AU - Swainson, Rachel

AU - Lazzeri, Marco

AU - Baylis, Gordon C.

N1 - This Document is Protected by copyright and was first published by Frontiers. All rights reserved. It is reproduced with permission.

PY - 2008/5/22

Y1 - 2008/5/22

N2 - Lavie (1995) have suggested that perceptual processing is infl uenced by perceptual load. Specifi cally, relevant information receives additional processing in high load situations exhausting the available capacity. On the other hand, irrelevant information receives less processing with increasing load on a relevant task, as there is a reduced amount of residual processing available. Rees et al. (1997) provided the fi rst physiological evidence for this model, showing this pattern in a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Likewise, Handy et al. (2001) offered supporting evidence measuring event related potentials (ERPs). Both of these studies presented irrelevant information in peripheral vision. Here we manipulated load while using the identical stimuli and the same task (a peripheral gap judgment task) with centrally presented irrelevant stimuli. ERPs show the pattern predicted by Lavie and colleagues, specifi cally for the N1 component. This work offers further evidence that visual attention modulates relatively early processing of perceptual information. Specifi cally, increasing load resulted in stronger N1 responses to relevant information and weaker N1 responses to irrelevant information.

AB - Lavie (1995) have suggested that perceptual processing is infl uenced by perceptual load. Specifi cally, relevant information receives additional processing in high load situations exhausting the available capacity. On the other hand, irrelevant information receives less processing with increasing load on a relevant task, as there is a reduced amount of residual processing available. Rees et al. (1997) provided the fi rst physiological evidence for this model, showing this pattern in a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Likewise, Handy et al. (2001) offered supporting evidence measuring event related potentials (ERPs). Both of these studies presented irrelevant information in peripheral vision. Here we manipulated load while using the identical stimuli and the same task (a peripheral gap judgment task) with centrally presented irrelevant stimuli. ERPs show the pattern predicted by Lavie and colleagues, specifi cally for the N1 component. This work offers further evidence that visual attention modulates relatively early processing of perceptual information. Specifi cally, increasing load resulted in stronger N1 responses to relevant information and weaker N1 responses to irrelevant information.

KW - human

KW - perception

KW - spatial attention

KW - perceptual load

KW - selective attention

KW - visual-attention

KW - extrastriate

KW - distractors

KW - mechanism

KW - color

U2 - 10.3389/neuro.09.004.2008

DO - 10.3389/neuro.09.004.2008

M3 - Article

VL - 2

JO - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

JF - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

SN - 1662-5161

M1 - 4

ER -