Everything should be as simple as possible, but no simpler

towards a protocol for accumulating evidence regarding the active content of health behaviour change interventions

G.-J.Y. Peters, M. de Bruin, R. Crutzen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

94 Citations (Scopus)
3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

There is a need to consolidate the evidence base underlying our toolbox of methods of behaviour change. Recent efforts to this effect have conducted meta-regressions on evaluations of behaviour change interventions, deriving each method's effectiveness from its association to intervention effect size. However, there are a range of issues that raise concern about whether this approach is actually furthering or instead obstructing the advancement of health psychology theories and the quality of health behaviour change interventions. Using examples from theory, the literature and data from previous meta-analyses, these concerns and their implications are explained and illustrated. An iterative protocol for evidence base accumulation is proposed that integrates evidence derived from both experimental and applied behaviour change research, and combines theory development in experimental settings with theory testing in applied real-life settings. As evidence gathered in this manner accumulates, a cumulative science of behaviour change can develop.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-14
Number of pages14
JournalHealth Psychology Review
Volume9
Issue number1
Early online date21 Oct 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Health Behavior
Behavioral Medicine
Meta-Analysis
Research

Keywords

  • behaviour change
  • interventions
  • methods
  • techniques
  • taxonomy
  • evidence base

Cite this

@article{93bb1e50c12549f49f15c27de5a445ac,
title = "Everything should be as simple as possible, but no simpler: towards a protocol for accumulating evidence regarding the active content of health behaviour change interventions",
abstract = "There is a need to consolidate the evidence base underlying our toolbox of methods of behaviour change. Recent efforts to this effect have conducted meta-regressions on evaluations of behaviour change interventions, deriving each method's effectiveness from its association to intervention effect size. However, there are a range of issues that raise concern about whether this approach is actually furthering or instead obstructing the advancement of health psychology theories and the quality of health behaviour change interventions. Using examples from theory, the literature and data from previous meta-analyses, these concerns and their implications are explained and illustrated. An iterative protocol for evidence base accumulation is proposed that integrates evidence derived from both experimental and applied behaviour change research, and combines theory development in experimental settings with theory testing in applied real-life settings. As evidence gathered in this manner accumulates, a cumulative science of behaviour change can develop.",
keywords = "behaviour change, interventions, methods , techniques, taxonomy, evidence base",
author = "G.-J.Y. Peters and {de Bruin}, M. and R. Crutzen",
note = "Supplemental data for this article can be accessed here: 10.1080/17437199.2013.848409",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1080/17437199.2013.848409",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "1--14",
journal = "Health Psychology Review",
issn = "1743-7199",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Everything should be as simple as possible, but no simpler

T2 - towards a protocol for accumulating evidence regarding the active content of health behaviour change interventions

AU - Peters, G.-J.Y.

AU - de Bruin, M.

AU - Crutzen, R.

N1 - Supplemental data for this article can be accessed here: 10.1080/17437199.2013.848409

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - There is a need to consolidate the evidence base underlying our toolbox of methods of behaviour change. Recent efforts to this effect have conducted meta-regressions on evaluations of behaviour change interventions, deriving each method's effectiveness from its association to intervention effect size. However, there are a range of issues that raise concern about whether this approach is actually furthering or instead obstructing the advancement of health psychology theories and the quality of health behaviour change interventions. Using examples from theory, the literature and data from previous meta-analyses, these concerns and their implications are explained and illustrated. An iterative protocol for evidence base accumulation is proposed that integrates evidence derived from both experimental and applied behaviour change research, and combines theory development in experimental settings with theory testing in applied real-life settings. As evidence gathered in this manner accumulates, a cumulative science of behaviour change can develop.

AB - There is a need to consolidate the evidence base underlying our toolbox of methods of behaviour change. Recent efforts to this effect have conducted meta-regressions on evaluations of behaviour change interventions, deriving each method's effectiveness from its association to intervention effect size. However, there are a range of issues that raise concern about whether this approach is actually furthering or instead obstructing the advancement of health psychology theories and the quality of health behaviour change interventions. Using examples from theory, the literature and data from previous meta-analyses, these concerns and their implications are explained and illustrated. An iterative protocol for evidence base accumulation is proposed that integrates evidence derived from both experimental and applied behaviour change research, and combines theory development in experimental settings with theory testing in applied real-life settings. As evidence gathered in this manner accumulates, a cumulative science of behaviour change can develop.

KW - behaviour change

KW - interventions

KW - methods

KW - techniques

KW - taxonomy

KW - evidence base

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84927161714&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17437199.2013.858979

U2 - 10.1080/17437199.2013.848409

DO - 10.1080/17437199.2013.848409

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 1

EP - 14

JO - Health Psychology Review

JF - Health Psychology Review

SN - 1743-7199

IS - 1

ER -