Evidence-based policy on dietary calcium and vitamin D

Ian R Reid, Alison Avenell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The Institute of Medicine's report on calcium and vitamin D makes a positive contribution by grounding its recommendations on the available evidence base. The committee does not substantially change recommended dietary intakes for calcium and modestly increases those for vitamin D based on the need for a median serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D of 40 nmol/L. They do not support the suggestion that all adults should have levels >75 nmol/L. The committee concludes that current evidence does not support nonskeletal benefits for vitamin D or calcium, and notes that higher intakes of both could have adverse health consequences. The present authors are generally in agreement with these conclusions, with some caveats regarding the evidence base used. However, we believe that the central role of sunlight exposure in determining vitamin D status needs to be explicitly reflected in public policy in this area.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)452-454
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Bone and Mineral Research
Volume26
Issue number3
Early online date1 Feb 2011
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2011

Fingerprint

Dietary Calcium
Vitamin D
Calcium
National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine (U.S.) Health and Medicine Division
Sunlight
Public Policy
Health
Serum

Keywords

  • Adult
  • Bone Density
  • Bone and Bones
  • Calcium, Dietary
  • Dietary Supplements
  • Evidence-Based Medicine
  • Health Policy
  • Humans
  • Nutritional Requirements
  • Vitamin D
  • Vitamin D Deficiency

Cite this

Evidence-based policy on dietary calcium and vitamin D. / Reid, Ian R; Avenell, Alison.

In: Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, Vol. 26, No. 3, 03.2011, p. 452-454.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0489cdb730564e2b8fe3a10dd60dd85f,
title = "Evidence-based policy on dietary calcium and vitamin D",
abstract = "The Institute of Medicine's report on calcium and vitamin D makes a positive contribution by grounding its recommendations on the available evidence base. The committee does not substantially change recommended dietary intakes for calcium and modestly increases those for vitamin D based on the need for a median serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D of 40 nmol/L. They do not support the suggestion that all adults should have levels >75 nmol/L. The committee concludes that current evidence does not support nonskeletal benefits for vitamin D or calcium, and notes that higher intakes of both could have adverse health consequences. The present authors are generally in agreement with these conclusions, with some caveats regarding the evidence base used. However, we believe that the central role of sunlight exposure in determining vitamin D status needs to be explicitly reflected in public policy in this area.",
keywords = "Adult, Bone Density, Bone and Bones, Calcium, Dietary, Dietary Supplements, Evidence-Based Medicine, Health Policy, Humans, Nutritional Requirements, Vitamin D, Vitamin D Deficiency",
author = "Reid, {Ian R} and Alison Avenell",
note = "Copyright {\circledC} 2011 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.",
year = "2011",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1002/jbmr.327",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "452--454",
journal = "Journal of Bone and Mineral Research",
issn = "0884-0431",
publisher = "WILEY-BLACKWELL",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evidence-based policy on dietary calcium and vitamin D

AU - Reid, Ian R

AU - Avenell, Alison

N1 - Copyright © 2011 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

PY - 2011/3

Y1 - 2011/3

N2 - The Institute of Medicine's report on calcium and vitamin D makes a positive contribution by grounding its recommendations on the available evidence base. The committee does not substantially change recommended dietary intakes for calcium and modestly increases those for vitamin D based on the need for a median serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D of 40 nmol/L. They do not support the suggestion that all adults should have levels >75 nmol/L. The committee concludes that current evidence does not support nonskeletal benefits for vitamin D or calcium, and notes that higher intakes of both could have adverse health consequences. The present authors are generally in agreement with these conclusions, with some caveats regarding the evidence base used. However, we believe that the central role of sunlight exposure in determining vitamin D status needs to be explicitly reflected in public policy in this area.

AB - The Institute of Medicine's report on calcium and vitamin D makes a positive contribution by grounding its recommendations on the available evidence base. The committee does not substantially change recommended dietary intakes for calcium and modestly increases those for vitamin D based on the need for a median serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D of 40 nmol/L. They do not support the suggestion that all adults should have levels >75 nmol/L. The committee concludes that current evidence does not support nonskeletal benefits for vitamin D or calcium, and notes that higher intakes of both could have adverse health consequences. The present authors are generally in agreement with these conclusions, with some caveats regarding the evidence base used. However, we believe that the central role of sunlight exposure in determining vitamin D status needs to be explicitly reflected in public policy in this area.

KW - Adult

KW - Bone Density

KW - Bone and Bones

KW - Calcium, Dietary

KW - Dietary Supplements

KW - Evidence-Based Medicine

KW - Health Policy

KW - Humans

KW - Nutritional Requirements

KW - Vitamin D

KW - Vitamin D Deficiency

U2 - 10.1002/jbmr.327

DO - 10.1002/jbmr.327

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 452

EP - 454

JO - Journal of Bone and Mineral Research

JF - Journal of Bone and Mineral Research

SN - 0884-0431

IS - 3

ER -