Evidence of advanced stage colorectal cancer with longer diagnostic intervals

a pooled analysis of seven primary care cohorts comprising 11,720 patients in five countries

Marie Louise Tørring (Corresponding Author), Peter Murchie, William Hamilton, Peter Vedsted, Magdalena Esteva, Marianne Djernes Lautrup, Marcy Winget, Greg Rubin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)
5 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The benefits from expedited diagnosis of symptomatic cancer are uncertain. We aimed to analyse the relationship between stage of colorectal cancer (CRC) and the primary and specialist care components of the diagnostic interval. METHODS: We identified seven independent datasets from population-based studies in Scotland, England, Canada, Denmark and Spain during 1997-2010 with a total of 11,720 newly-diagnosed CRC patients, who had initially presented with symptoms to a primary care physician. Data were extracted from patient records, registries, audits and questionnaires, respectively. Datasets were required to hold information on dates in the diagnostic interval (defined as the time from the first presentation of symptoms in primary care until the date of diagnosis), symptoms at first presentation in primary care, route of referral, gender, age and histologically confirmed stage. We carried out reanalysis of all individual datasets and, using the same method, analyzed a pooled individual patient dataset. RESULTS: The association between intervals and stage was similar in the individual and combined dataset. There was a statistically significant convex (∩-shaped) association between primary care interval and diagnosis of advanced (i.e. distant or regional) rather than localised CRC (P=0.002), with odds beginning to increase from the first day on and peaking at 90 days. For specialist care we saw an opposite and statistically significant concave (∪-shaped) association, with a trough at 60 days, between the interval and diagnosis of advanced CRC (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence that longer diagnostic intervals are associated with more advanced CRC. Furthermore, the study cannot define a specific ’safe’ waiting time as the length of the primary care interval appears to have negative impact from day one.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)888-897
Number of pages10
JournalBritish Journal of Cancer
Volume117
Issue number6
Early online date8 Aug 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 5 Sep 2017

Fingerprint

Colorectal Neoplasms
Primary Health Care
Scotland
Primary Care Physicians
Denmark
England
Spain
Canada
Registries
Referral and Consultation
Datasets
Population
Neoplasms

Keywords

  • delayed diagnosis
  • waiting lists
  • tumour staging
  • colorectal cancer
  • primary health care
  • bias

Cite this

Evidence of advanced stage colorectal cancer with longer diagnostic intervals : a pooled analysis of seven primary care cohorts comprising 11,720 patients in five countries. / Tørring, Marie Louise (Corresponding Author); Murchie, Peter; Hamilton, William ; Vedsted, Peter; Esteva, Magdalena ; Djernes Lautrup, Marianne ; Winget, Marcy ; Rubin, Greg .

In: British Journal of Cancer, Vol. 117, No. 6, 05.09.2017, p. 888-897.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tørring, Marie Louise ; Murchie, Peter ; Hamilton, William ; Vedsted, Peter ; Esteva, Magdalena ; Djernes Lautrup, Marianne ; Winget, Marcy ; Rubin, Greg . / Evidence of advanced stage colorectal cancer with longer diagnostic intervals : a pooled analysis of seven primary care cohorts comprising 11,720 patients in five countries. In: British Journal of Cancer. 2017 ; Vol. 117, No. 6. pp. 888-897.
@article{3ad833f0040f4706aa19bfe8472e02d3,
title = "Evidence of advanced stage colorectal cancer with longer diagnostic intervals: a pooled analysis of seven primary care cohorts comprising 11,720 patients in five countries",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: The benefits from expedited diagnosis of symptomatic cancer are uncertain. We aimed to analyse the relationship between stage of colorectal cancer (CRC) and the primary and specialist care components of the diagnostic interval. METHODS: We identified seven independent datasets from population-based studies in Scotland, England, Canada, Denmark and Spain during 1997-2010 with a total of 11,720 newly-diagnosed CRC patients, who had initially presented with symptoms to a primary care physician. Data were extracted from patient records, registries, audits and questionnaires, respectively. Datasets were required to hold information on dates in the diagnostic interval (defined as the time from the first presentation of symptoms in primary care until the date of diagnosis), symptoms at first presentation in primary care, route of referral, gender, age and histologically confirmed stage. We carried out reanalysis of all individual datasets and, using the same method, analyzed a pooled individual patient dataset. RESULTS: The association between intervals and stage was similar in the individual and combined dataset. There was a statistically significant convex (∩-shaped) association between primary care interval and diagnosis of advanced (i.e. distant or regional) rather than localised CRC (P=0.002), with odds beginning to increase from the first day on and peaking at 90 days. For specialist care we saw an opposite and statistically significant concave (∪-shaped) association, with a trough at 60 days, between the interval and diagnosis of advanced CRC (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence that longer diagnostic intervals are associated with more advanced CRC. Furthermore, the study cannot define a specific ’safe’ waiting time as the length of the primary care interval appears to have negative impact from day one.",
keywords = "delayed diagnosis, waiting lists, tumour staging, colorectal cancer, primary health care, bias",
author = "T{\o}rring, {Marie Louise} and Peter Murchie and William Hamilton and Peter Vedsted and Magdalena Esteva and {Djernes Lautrup}, Marianne and Marcy Winget and Greg Rubin",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
day = "5",
doi = "10.1038/bjc.2017.236",
language = "English",
volume = "117",
pages = "888--897",
journal = "British Journal of Cancer",
issn = "0007-0920",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evidence of advanced stage colorectal cancer with longer diagnostic intervals

T2 - a pooled analysis of seven primary care cohorts comprising 11,720 patients in five countries

AU - Tørring, Marie Louise

AU - Murchie, Peter

AU - Hamilton, William

AU - Vedsted, Peter

AU - Esteva, Magdalena

AU - Djernes Lautrup, Marianne

AU - Winget, Marcy

AU - Rubin, Greg

PY - 2017/9/5

Y1 - 2017/9/5

N2 - BACKGROUND: The benefits from expedited diagnosis of symptomatic cancer are uncertain. We aimed to analyse the relationship between stage of colorectal cancer (CRC) and the primary and specialist care components of the diagnostic interval. METHODS: We identified seven independent datasets from population-based studies in Scotland, England, Canada, Denmark and Spain during 1997-2010 with a total of 11,720 newly-diagnosed CRC patients, who had initially presented with symptoms to a primary care physician. Data were extracted from patient records, registries, audits and questionnaires, respectively. Datasets were required to hold information on dates in the diagnostic interval (defined as the time from the first presentation of symptoms in primary care until the date of diagnosis), symptoms at first presentation in primary care, route of referral, gender, age and histologically confirmed stage. We carried out reanalysis of all individual datasets and, using the same method, analyzed a pooled individual patient dataset. RESULTS: The association between intervals and stage was similar in the individual and combined dataset. There was a statistically significant convex (∩-shaped) association between primary care interval and diagnosis of advanced (i.e. distant or regional) rather than localised CRC (P=0.002), with odds beginning to increase from the first day on and peaking at 90 days. For specialist care we saw an opposite and statistically significant concave (∪-shaped) association, with a trough at 60 days, between the interval and diagnosis of advanced CRC (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence that longer diagnostic intervals are associated with more advanced CRC. Furthermore, the study cannot define a specific ’safe’ waiting time as the length of the primary care interval appears to have negative impact from day one.

AB - BACKGROUND: The benefits from expedited diagnosis of symptomatic cancer are uncertain. We aimed to analyse the relationship between stage of colorectal cancer (CRC) and the primary and specialist care components of the diagnostic interval. METHODS: We identified seven independent datasets from population-based studies in Scotland, England, Canada, Denmark and Spain during 1997-2010 with a total of 11,720 newly-diagnosed CRC patients, who had initially presented with symptoms to a primary care physician. Data were extracted from patient records, registries, audits and questionnaires, respectively. Datasets were required to hold information on dates in the diagnostic interval (defined as the time from the first presentation of symptoms in primary care until the date of diagnosis), symptoms at first presentation in primary care, route of referral, gender, age and histologically confirmed stage. We carried out reanalysis of all individual datasets and, using the same method, analyzed a pooled individual patient dataset. RESULTS: The association between intervals and stage was similar in the individual and combined dataset. There was a statistically significant convex (∩-shaped) association between primary care interval and diagnosis of advanced (i.e. distant or regional) rather than localised CRC (P=0.002), with odds beginning to increase from the first day on and peaking at 90 days. For specialist care we saw an opposite and statistically significant concave (∪-shaped) association, with a trough at 60 days, between the interval and diagnosis of advanced CRC (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence that longer diagnostic intervals are associated with more advanced CRC. Furthermore, the study cannot define a specific ’safe’ waiting time as the length of the primary care interval appears to have negative impact from day one.

KW - delayed diagnosis

KW - waiting lists

KW - tumour staging

KW - colorectal cancer

KW - primary health care

KW - bias

U2 - 10.1038/bjc.2017.236

DO - 10.1038/bjc.2017.236

M3 - Article

VL - 117

SP - 888

EP - 897

JO - British Journal of Cancer

JF - British Journal of Cancer

SN - 0007-0920

IS - 6

ER -