Evolution of female multiple mating

A quantitative model of the “sexually selected sperm” hypothesis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)
5 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Explaining the evolution and maintenance of polyandry remains a key challenge in evolutionary ecology. One appealing explanation is the sexually-selected sperm (SSS) hypothesis, which proposes that polyandry evolves due to indirect selection stemming from positive genetic covariance with male fertilization efficiency, and hence with a male's success in post-copulatory competition for paternity. However, the SSS hypothesis relies on verbal analogy with 'sexy-son' models explaining co-evolution of female preferences for male displays, and explicit models that validate the basic SSS principle are surprisingly lacking. We developed analogous genetically-explicit individual-based models describing the SSS and 'sexy-son' processes. We show that the analogy between the two is only partly valid, such that the genetic correlation arising between polyandry and fertilization efficiency is generally smaller than that arising between preference and display, resulting in less reliable co-evolution. Importantly, indirect selection was too weak to cause polyandry to evolve in the presence of negative direct selection. Negatively-biased mutations on fertilization efficiency did not generally rescue runaway evolution of polyandry unless realized fertilization was highly skewed towards a single male, and co-evolution was even weaker given random mating-order effects on fertilization. Our models suggest that the SSS process is, on its own, unlikely to generally explain the evolution of polyandry. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)39-58
Number of pages20
JournalEvolution
Volume69
Issue number1
Early online date28 Nov 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2015

Fingerprint

polyandry
multiple mating
Fertilization
sperm
Spermatozoa
fertilization (reproduction)
spermatozoa
coevolution
Nuclear Family
Homeless Youth
genetic covariance
individual-based model
Ecology
random mating
paternity
genetic correlation
Maintenance
mutation
Mutation
ecology

Keywords

  • fertilization efficiency
  • genetic covariance
  • indirect selection
  • polyandry
  • runaway coevolution
  • sperm competition
  • sexy-son

Cite this

Evolution of female multiple mating : A quantitative model of the “sexually selected sperm” hypothesis. / Bocedi, Greta; Reid, Jane M.

In: Evolution, Vol. 69, No. 1, 01.2015, p. 39-58.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{dbc5340815f54c00ba83164af31d3c7e,
title = "Evolution of female multiple mating: A quantitative model of the “sexually selected sperm” hypothesis",
abstract = "Explaining the evolution and maintenance of polyandry remains a key challenge in evolutionary ecology. One appealing explanation is the sexually-selected sperm (SSS) hypothesis, which proposes that polyandry evolves due to indirect selection stemming from positive genetic covariance with male fertilization efficiency, and hence with a male's success in post-copulatory competition for paternity. However, the SSS hypothesis relies on verbal analogy with 'sexy-son' models explaining co-evolution of female preferences for male displays, and explicit models that validate the basic SSS principle are surprisingly lacking. We developed analogous genetically-explicit individual-based models describing the SSS and 'sexy-son' processes. We show that the analogy between the two is only partly valid, such that the genetic correlation arising between polyandry and fertilization efficiency is generally smaller than that arising between preference and display, resulting in less reliable co-evolution. Importantly, indirect selection was too weak to cause polyandry to evolve in the presence of negative direct selection. Negatively-biased mutations on fertilization efficiency did not generally rescue runaway evolution of polyandry unless realized fertilization was highly skewed towards a single male, and co-evolution was even weaker given random mating-order effects on fertilization. Our models suggest that the SSS process is, on its own, unlikely to generally explain the evolution of polyandry. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.",
keywords = "fertilization efficiency, genetic covariance, indirect selection, polyandry, runaway coevolution, sperm competition, sexy-son",
author = "Greta Bocedi and Reid, {Jane M}",
note = "This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1111/evo.12550",
language = "English",
volume = "69",
pages = "39--58",
journal = "Evolution",
issn = "0014-3820",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evolution of female multiple mating

T2 - A quantitative model of the “sexually selected sperm” hypothesis

AU - Bocedi, Greta

AU - Reid, Jane M

N1 - This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PY - 2015/1

Y1 - 2015/1

N2 - Explaining the evolution and maintenance of polyandry remains a key challenge in evolutionary ecology. One appealing explanation is the sexually-selected sperm (SSS) hypothesis, which proposes that polyandry evolves due to indirect selection stemming from positive genetic covariance with male fertilization efficiency, and hence with a male's success in post-copulatory competition for paternity. However, the SSS hypothesis relies on verbal analogy with 'sexy-son' models explaining co-evolution of female preferences for male displays, and explicit models that validate the basic SSS principle are surprisingly lacking. We developed analogous genetically-explicit individual-based models describing the SSS and 'sexy-son' processes. We show that the analogy between the two is only partly valid, such that the genetic correlation arising between polyandry and fertilization efficiency is generally smaller than that arising between preference and display, resulting in less reliable co-evolution. Importantly, indirect selection was too weak to cause polyandry to evolve in the presence of negative direct selection. Negatively-biased mutations on fertilization efficiency did not generally rescue runaway evolution of polyandry unless realized fertilization was highly skewed towards a single male, and co-evolution was even weaker given random mating-order effects on fertilization. Our models suggest that the SSS process is, on its own, unlikely to generally explain the evolution of polyandry. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

AB - Explaining the evolution and maintenance of polyandry remains a key challenge in evolutionary ecology. One appealing explanation is the sexually-selected sperm (SSS) hypothesis, which proposes that polyandry evolves due to indirect selection stemming from positive genetic covariance with male fertilization efficiency, and hence with a male's success in post-copulatory competition for paternity. However, the SSS hypothesis relies on verbal analogy with 'sexy-son' models explaining co-evolution of female preferences for male displays, and explicit models that validate the basic SSS principle are surprisingly lacking. We developed analogous genetically-explicit individual-based models describing the SSS and 'sexy-son' processes. We show that the analogy between the two is only partly valid, such that the genetic correlation arising between polyandry and fertilization efficiency is generally smaller than that arising between preference and display, resulting in less reliable co-evolution. Importantly, indirect selection was too weak to cause polyandry to evolve in the presence of negative direct selection. Negatively-biased mutations on fertilization efficiency did not generally rescue runaway evolution of polyandry unless realized fertilization was highly skewed towards a single male, and co-evolution was even weaker given random mating-order effects on fertilization. Our models suggest that the SSS process is, on its own, unlikely to generally explain the evolution of polyandry. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

KW - fertilization efficiency

KW - genetic covariance

KW - indirect selection

KW - polyandry

KW - runaway coevolution

KW - sperm competition

KW - sexy-son

U2 - 10.1111/evo.12550

DO - 10.1111/evo.12550

M3 - Article

VL - 69

SP - 39

EP - 58

JO - Evolution

JF - Evolution

SN - 0014-3820

IS - 1

ER -