Evolution of Inbreeding Avoidance and Inbreeding Preference through Mate Choice among Interacting Relatives

A. Bradley Duthie, Jane M. Reid

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)
3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

While extensive population genetic theory predicts conditions favouring evolution of selffertilisation
versus outcrossing, there is no analogous theory that predicts conditions
favouring evolution of inbreeding avoidance or inbreeding preference enacted through
mate choice given obligate biparental reproduction. Multiple interacting processes complicate
the dynamics of alleles underlying such inbreeding strategies, including sexual
conflict, distributions of kinship, genetic drift, purging of mutation load, direct costs,
and restricted kin discrimination. We incorporated these processes into an individualbased
model to predict conditions where selection should increase or decrease frequencies
of alleles causing inbreeding avoidance or inbreeding preference when females or males
controlled mating. Selection for inbreeding avoidance occurred given strong inbreeding
depression when either sex chose mates, while selection for inbreeding preference occurred
given very weak inbreeding depression when females chose but never occurred when males
chose. Selection for both strategies was constrained by direct costs and restricted kin discrimination.
Purging was negligible, but allele frequencies were strongly affected by drift
in small populations, while selection for inbreeding avoidance was weak in larger populations
because inbreeding risk decreased. Therefore, while selection sometimes favoured
alleles underlying inbreeding avoidance or preference, evolution of such strategies may be
much more restricted and stochastic than is commonly presumed.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)651-667
Number of pages17
JournalThe American Naturalist
Volume188
Issue number6
Early online date28 Oct 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2016

Fingerprint

inbreeding avoidance
mate choice
inbreeding
mating behavior
allele
inbreeding depression
outcrossing
kinship
genetic drift
cost
population genetics
mutation
alleles
risk reduction
gene frequency

Keywords

  • inbreeding strategy
  • mate choice
  • mating system
  • reproductive strategy
  • relatedness
  • fitness

Cite this

Evolution of Inbreeding Avoidance and Inbreeding Preference through Mate Choice among Interacting Relatives. / Duthie, A. Bradley; Reid, Jane M.

In: The American Naturalist, Vol. 188, No. 6, 12.2016, p. 651-667.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e9c769f87cea4def8c10ac65f51f8551,
title = "Evolution of Inbreeding Avoidance and Inbreeding Preference through Mate Choice among Interacting Relatives",
abstract = "While extensive population genetic theory predicts conditions favouring evolution of selffertilisationversus outcrossing, there is no analogous theory that predicts conditionsfavouring evolution of inbreeding avoidance or inbreeding preference enacted throughmate choice given obligate biparental reproduction. Multiple interacting processes complicatethe dynamics of alleles underlying such inbreeding strategies, including sexualconflict, distributions of kinship, genetic drift, purging of mutation load, direct costs,and restricted kin discrimination. We incorporated these processes into an individualbasedmodel to predict conditions where selection should increase or decrease frequenciesof alleles causing inbreeding avoidance or inbreeding preference when females or malescontrolled mating. Selection for inbreeding avoidance occurred given strong inbreedingdepression when either sex chose mates, while selection for inbreeding preference occurredgiven very weak inbreeding depression when females chose but never occurred when maleschose. Selection for both strategies was constrained by direct costs and restricted kin discrimination.Purging was negligible, but allele frequencies were strongly affected by driftin small populations, while selection for inbreeding avoidance was weak in larger populationsbecause inbreeding risk decreased. Therefore, while selection sometimes favouredalleles underlying inbreeding avoidance or preference, evolution of such strategies may bemuch more restricted and stochastic than is commonly presumed.",
keywords = "inbreeding strategy, mate choice, mating system, reproductive strategy, relatedness, fitness",
author = "Duthie, {A. Bradley} and Reid, {Jane M.}",
note = "This work was funded by a European Research Council Consolidator Grant and a Royal Society University Research Fellowship to JMR. We thank Greta Bocedi, Hannah Kokko, Lukas Keller, Sylvain Losdat, and Matthew Wolak for their helpful comments. Computer simulations were performed using the Maxwell Computing Cluster at the University of Aberdeen.",
year = "2016",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1086/688919",
language = "English",
volume = "188",
pages = "651--667",
journal = "The American Naturalist",
issn = "0003-0147",
publisher = "UNIV CHICAGO PRESS",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evolution of Inbreeding Avoidance and Inbreeding Preference through Mate Choice among Interacting Relatives

AU - Duthie, A. Bradley

AU - Reid, Jane M.

N1 - This work was funded by a European Research Council Consolidator Grant and a Royal Society University Research Fellowship to JMR. We thank Greta Bocedi, Hannah Kokko, Lukas Keller, Sylvain Losdat, and Matthew Wolak for their helpful comments. Computer simulations were performed using the Maxwell Computing Cluster at the University of Aberdeen.

PY - 2016/12

Y1 - 2016/12

N2 - While extensive population genetic theory predicts conditions favouring evolution of selffertilisationversus outcrossing, there is no analogous theory that predicts conditionsfavouring evolution of inbreeding avoidance or inbreeding preference enacted throughmate choice given obligate biparental reproduction. Multiple interacting processes complicatethe dynamics of alleles underlying such inbreeding strategies, including sexualconflict, distributions of kinship, genetic drift, purging of mutation load, direct costs,and restricted kin discrimination. We incorporated these processes into an individualbasedmodel to predict conditions where selection should increase or decrease frequenciesof alleles causing inbreeding avoidance or inbreeding preference when females or malescontrolled mating. Selection for inbreeding avoidance occurred given strong inbreedingdepression when either sex chose mates, while selection for inbreeding preference occurredgiven very weak inbreeding depression when females chose but never occurred when maleschose. Selection for both strategies was constrained by direct costs and restricted kin discrimination.Purging was negligible, but allele frequencies were strongly affected by driftin small populations, while selection for inbreeding avoidance was weak in larger populationsbecause inbreeding risk decreased. Therefore, while selection sometimes favouredalleles underlying inbreeding avoidance or preference, evolution of such strategies may bemuch more restricted and stochastic than is commonly presumed.

AB - While extensive population genetic theory predicts conditions favouring evolution of selffertilisationversus outcrossing, there is no analogous theory that predicts conditionsfavouring evolution of inbreeding avoidance or inbreeding preference enacted throughmate choice given obligate biparental reproduction. Multiple interacting processes complicatethe dynamics of alleles underlying such inbreeding strategies, including sexualconflict, distributions of kinship, genetic drift, purging of mutation load, direct costs,and restricted kin discrimination. We incorporated these processes into an individualbasedmodel to predict conditions where selection should increase or decrease frequenciesof alleles causing inbreeding avoidance or inbreeding preference when females or malescontrolled mating. Selection for inbreeding avoidance occurred given strong inbreedingdepression when either sex chose mates, while selection for inbreeding preference occurredgiven very weak inbreeding depression when females chose but never occurred when maleschose. Selection for both strategies was constrained by direct costs and restricted kin discrimination.Purging was negligible, but allele frequencies were strongly affected by driftin small populations, while selection for inbreeding avoidance was weak in larger populationsbecause inbreeding risk decreased. Therefore, while selection sometimes favouredalleles underlying inbreeding avoidance or preference, evolution of such strategies may bemuch more restricted and stochastic than is commonly presumed.

KW - inbreeding strategy

KW - mate choice

KW - mating system

KW - reproductive strategy

KW - relatedness

KW - fitness

U2 - 10.1086/688919

DO - 10.1086/688919

M3 - Article

VL - 188

SP - 651

EP - 667

JO - The American Naturalist

JF - The American Naturalist

SN - 0003-0147

IS - 6

ER -