Ex ante impact assessment of policies affecting land use

Part B: application of the analytical framework

Katharina Helming, Katharina Diehl, Tom Kuhlman, Torbjörn Jansson, Peter H. Verburg, Martha Bakker, Marta Perez-Soba, Laurence Jones, Pieter Johannes Verkerk, Paul Tabbush, Jake Breton Morris, Zuzana Drillet, John Hugh Farrington, Pierre LeMouël, Paul Zagame, Tomasz Stuczynski, Grzegorz Siebielec, Stefan Sieber, Hubert Wiggering

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

54 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The use of science-based tools for impact assessment has increasingly gained focus in addressing the complexity of interactions between environment, society, and economy. For integrated assessment of policies affecting land use, an analytical framework was developed. The aim of our work was to apply the analytical framework for specific scenario cases and in combination with quantitative and qualitative application methods. The analytical framework was tested for two cases involving the ex ante impact assessment of: (1) a European Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) financial reform scenario employing a modeling approach and combined with a comprehensive indicator analysis and valuation; and (2) a regional bioenergy policy scenario, employing a fully participatory approach. The results showed that European land use in general is less sensitive to changes in the Common Agricultural Policy, but in the context of regions there can be significant impacts on the functions of land use. In general, the implementation of the analytical framework for impact assessment proved to be doable with both methods, i.e., with the quantitative modeling and with the qualitative participatory approach. A key advantage of using the system of linked quantitative models is that it makes possible the simultaneous consideration of all relevant sectors of the economy without abstaining from a great level of detail for sectors of particular interest. Other advantages lie in the incontestable character of the results. Based on neutral, existing data with a fixed set of settings and regions, an absolute comparability and reproducibility throughout Europe can be maintained. Analyzing the pros and cons of both approaches showed that they could be used complementarily rather than be seen as competing alternatives.

Original languageEnglish
Article number29
JournalEcology and Society
Volume16
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Fingerprint

analytical framework
land use
Common Agricultural Policy
participatory approach
bioenergy
valuation
modeling
policy
impact assessment
economy
method

Keywords

  • analytical framework
  • discussion tools
  • DPSIR framework
  • ex ante impact assessment
  • land-use change
  • model-based tools
  • participatory assesment tools
  • policy development
  • sustainability

Cite this

Helming, K., Diehl, K., Kuhlman, T., Jansson, T., Verburg, P. H., Bakker, M., ... Wiggering, H. (2011). Ex ante impact assessment of policies affecting land use: Part B: application of the analytical framework. Ecology and Society, 16(1), [29]. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03840-160129

Ex ante impact assessment of policies affecting land use : Part B: application of the analytical framework. / Helming, Katharina; Diehl, Katharina ; Kuhlman, Tom; Jansson, Torbjörn; Verburg, Peter H.; Bakker, Martha; Perez-Soba, Marta; Jones, Laurence ; Verkerk, Pieter Johannes; Tabbush, Paul; Morris, Jake Breton; Drillet, Zuzana; Farrington, John Hugh; LeMouël, Pierre; Zagame, Paul; Stuczynski, Tomasz; Siebielec, Grzegorz; Sieber, Stefan; Wiggering, Hubert.

In: Ecology and Society, Vol. 16, No. 1, 29, 2011.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Helming, K, Diehl, K, Kuhlman, T, Jansson, T, Verburg, PH, Bakker, M, Perez-Soba, M, Jones, L, Verkerk, PJ, Tabbush, P, Morris, JB, Drillet, Z, Farrington, JH, LeMouël, P, Zagame, P, Stuczynski, T, Siebielec, G, Sieber, S & Wiggering, H 2011, 'Ex ante impact assessment of policies affecting land use: Part B: application of the analytical framework', Ecology and Society, vol. 16, no. 1, 29. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03840-160129
Helming, Katharina ; Diehl, Katharina ; Kuhlman, Tom ; Jansson, Torbjörn ; Verburg, Peter H. ; Bakker, Martha ; Perez-Soba, Marta ; Jones, Laurence ; Verkerk, Pieter Johannes ; Tabbush, Paul ; Morris, Jake Breton ; Drillet, Zuzana ; Farrington, John Hugh ; LeMouël, Pierre ; Zagame, Paul ; Stuczynski, Tomasz ; Siebielec, Grzegorz ; Sieber, Stefan ; Wiggering, Hubert. / Ex ante impact assessment of policies affecting land use : Part B: application of the analytical framework. In: Ecology and Society. 2011 ; Vol. 16, No. 1.
@article{990e4390b4514ec9a167df34b431579d,
title = "Ex ante impact assessment of policies affecting land use: Part B: application of the analytical framework",
abstract = "The use of science-based tools for impact assessment has increasingly gained focus in addressing the complexity of interactions between environment, society, and economy. For integrated assessment of policies affecting land use, an analytical framework was developed. The aim of our work was to apply the analytical framework for specific scenario cases and in combination with quantitative and qualitative application methods. The analytical framework was tested for two cases involving the ex ante impact assessment of: (1) a European Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) financial reform scenario employing a modeling approach and combined with a comprehensive indicator analysis and valuation; and (2) a regional bioenergy policy scenario, employing a fully participatory approach. The results showed that European land use in general is less sensitive to changes in the Common Agricultural Policy, but in the context of regions there can be significant impacts on the functions of land use. In general, the implementation of the analytical framework for impact assessment proved to be doable with both methods, i.e., with the quantitative modeling and with the qualitative participatory approach. A key advantage of using the system of linked quantitative models is that it makes possible the simultaneous consideration of all relevant sectors of the economy without abstaining from a great level of detail for sectors of particular interest. Other advantages lie in the incontestable character of the results. Based on neutral, existing data with a fixed set of settings and regions, an absolute comparability and reproducibility throughout Europe can be maintained. Analyzing the pros and cons of both approaches showed that they could be used complementarily rather than be seen as competing alternatives.",
keywords = "analytical framework, discussion tools, DPSIR framework, ex ante impact assessment, land-use change, model-based tools, participatory assesment tools, policy development, sustainability",
author = "Katharina Helming and Katharina Diehl and Tom Kuhlman and Torbj{\"o}rn Jansson and Verburg, {Peter H.} and Martha Bakker and Marta Perez-Soba and Laurence Jones and Verkerk, {Pieter Johannes} and Paul Tabbush and Morris, {Jake Breton} and Zuzana Drillet and Farrington, {John Hugh} and Pierre LeMou{\"e}l and Paul Zagame and Tomasz Stuczynski and Grzegorz Siebielec and Stefan Sieber and Hubert Wiggering",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.5751/ES-03840-160129",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
journal = "Ecology and Society",
issn = "1708-3087",
publisher = "The Resilience Alliance",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ex ante impact assessment of policies affecting land use

T2 - Part B: application of the analytical framework

AU - Helming, Katharina

AU - Diehl, Katharina

AU - Kuhlman, Tom

AU - Jansson, Torbjörn

AU - Verburg, Peter H.

AU - Bakker, Martha

AU - Perez-Soba, Marta

AU - Jones, Laurence

AU - Verkerk, Pieter Johannes

AU - Tabbush, Paul

AU - Morris, Jake Breton

AU - Drillet, Zuzana

AU - Farrington, John Hugh

AU - LeMouël, Pierre

AU - Zagame, Paul

AU - Stuczynski, Tomasz

AU - Siebielec, Grzegorz

AU - Sieber, Stefan

AU - Wiggering, Hubert

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - The use of science-based tools for impact assessment has increasingly gained focus in addressing the complexity of interactions between environment, society, and economy. For integrated assessment of policies affecting land use, an analytical framework was developed. The aim of our work was to apply the analytical framework for specific scenario cases and in combination with quantitative and qualitative application methods. The analytical framework was tested for two cases involving the ex ante impact assessment of: (1) a European Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) financial reform scenario employing a modeling approach and combined with a comprehensive indicator analysis and valuation; and (2) a regional bioenergy policy scenario, employing a fully participatory approach. The results showed that European land use in general is less sensitive to changes in the Common Agricultural Policy, but in the context of regions there can be significant impacts on the functions of land use. In general, the implementation of the analytical framework for impact assessment proved to be doable with both methods, i.e., with the quantitative modeling and with the qualitative participatory approach. A key advantage of using the system of linked quantitative models is that it makes possible the simultaneous consideration of all relevant sectors of the economy without abstaining from a great level of detail for sectors of particular interest. Other advantages lie in the incontestable character of the results. Based on neutral, existing data with a fixed set of settings and regions, an absolute comparability and reproducibility throughout Europe can be maintained. Analyzing the pros and cons of both approaches showed that they could be used complementarily rather than be seen as competing alternatives.

AB - The use of science-based tools for impact assessment has increasingly gained focus in addressing the complexity of interactions between environment, society, and economy. For integrated assessment of policies affecting land use, an analytical framework was developed. The aim of our work was to apply the analytical framework for specific scenario cases and in combination with quantitative and qualitative application methods. The analytical framework was tested for two cases involving the ex ante impact assessment of: (1) a European Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) financial reform scenario employing a modeling approach and combined with a comprehensive indicator analysis and valuation; and (2) a regional bioenergy policy scenario, employing a fully participatory approach. The results showed that European land use in general is less sensitive to changes in the Common Agricultural Policy, but in the context of regions there can be significant impacts on the functions of land use. In general, the implementation of the analytical framework for impact assessment proved to be doable with both methods, i.e., with the quantitative modeling and with the qualitative participatory approach. A key advantage of using the system of linked quantitative models is that it makes possible the simultaneous consideration of all relevant sectors of the economy without abstaining from a great level of detail for sectors of particular interest. Other advantages lie in the incontestable character of the results. Based on neutral, existing data with a fixed set of settings and regions, an absolute comparability and reproducibility throughout Europe can be maintained. Analyzing the pros and cons of both approaches showed that they could be used complementarily rather than be seen as competing alternatives.

KW - analytical framework

KW - discussion tools

KW - DPSIR framework

KW - ex ante impact assessment

KW - land-use change

KW - model-based tools

KW - participatory assesment tools

KW - policy development

KW - sustainability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79954503613&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5751/ES-03840-160129

DO - 10.5751/ES-03840-160129

M3 - Article

VL - 16

JO - Ecology and Society

JF - Ecology and Society

SN - 1708-3087

IS - 1

M1 - 29

ER -