Examining the diversity of MRCS examiners

Ricky Ellis; Peter A Brennan; John Hines; Amanda J Lee; Jennifer Cleland

doi:10.1016/j.surge.2023.02.002

Examining the diversity of MRCS examiners

Ricky Ellis^* (Corresponding Author), Peter A Brennan, John Hines, Amanda J Lee, Jennifer Cleland

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: MRCS examiners are the face of the Royal College of Surgeons for early-career surgeons and should therefore represent the workforce they are examining as not to marginalise or negatively impact on the assessment experience of candidates from minoritised groups. This study aimed to explore the diversity of MRCS examiners and whether they represent the demographics of the MRCS candidates.

METHODS: A retrospective observational study including all active examiners and examination candidates who attempted MRCS Part A or Part B between January 2020 and July 2021. Self-declared demographic data collected by the Intercollegiate Committee for Basic Surgical Examinations (ICBSE) included gender, sexual orientation, disability status and ethnicity. Following data anonymisation, total group response frequencies were made available to the research team for statistical analysis.

RESULTS: Chi-squared analyses showed statistically significant differences in the representation of gender, disability and ethnicity between candidates and examiners (all p < 0.001). Men (83.9% (n = 1121) vs 70.9% (n = 6017) respectively), individuals without disability (98.7% (n = 917) vs 96.1% (n = 6847)) and individuals of White ethnicity (36.6% (n = 346) vs 20.4% (n = 1223)) were significantly overrepresented in the examiners compared to the examination candidates. There was no statistically significant difference in sexual orientation between examiners and candidates (p = 0.712).

CONCLUSIONS: Broadly speaking, the socio-demographic profile of MRCS examiners reflects that seen in senior and leadership positions in surgery in the UK - that is, predominantly male and White - but not that seen in early-career surgeons. Positive action is now required in examiner recruitment by the Royal Colleges to ensure that the cohort of MRCS examiners reflects the modern surgical workforce.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	273-277
Number of pages	5
Journal	The Surgeon
Volume	21
Issue number	5
Early online date	25 Feb 2023
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2023.02.002
Publication status	Published - 1 Oct 2023

Bibliographical note

Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge Gregory Ayre from the Intercollegiate Committee for Basic Surgical Examinations for his support during this project.

Funding
Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh, Royal College of Surgeons of Ireland.
Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Glasgow and Royal College of Surgeons of England.

Keywords

surgery
medical education and training
medical ethics

Access to Document

10.1016/j.surge.2023.02.002Licence: CC BY

Ellis_etal_TS_Examining_The_Diversity_VoR
©2023TheAuthor(s).PublishedbyElsevierLtdonbehalfofRoyalCollegeofSurgeonsofEdinburgh(ScottishcharitynumberSC005317)and RoyalCollegeofSurgeonsinIreland.ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCCBYlicense(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Final published version, 169 KBLicence: CC BY

Cite this

@article{e44240d8e58943bcad47844b10f9d197,

title = "Examining the diversity of MRCS examiners",

abstract = "BACKGROUND: MRCS examiners are the face of the Royal College of Surgeons for early-career surgeons and should therefore represent the workforce they are examining as not to marginalise or negatively impact on the assessment experience of candidates from minoritised groups. This study aimed to explore the diversity of MRCS examiners and whether they represent the demographics of the MRCS candidates.METHODS: A retrospective observational study including all active examiners and examination candidates who attempted MRCS Part A or Part B between January 2020 and July 2021. Self-declared demographic data collected by the Intercollegiate Committee for Basic Surgical Examinations (ICBSE) included gender, sexual orientation, disability status and ethnicity. Following data anonymisation, total group response frequencies were made available to the research team for statistical analysis.RESULTS: Chi-squared analyses showed statistically significant differences in the representation of gender, disability and ethnicity between candidates and examiners (all p < 0.001). Men (83.9% (n = 1121) vs 70.9% (n = 6017) respectively), individuals without disability (98.7% (n = 917) vs 96.1% (n = 6847)) and individuals of White ethnicity (36.6% (n = 346) vs 20.4% (n = 1223)) were significantly overrepresented in the examiners compared to the examination candidates. There was no statistically significant difference in sexual orientation between examiners and candidates (p = 0.712).CONCLUSIONS: Broadly speaking, the socio-demographic profile of MRCS examiners reflects that seen in senior and leadership positions in surgery in the UK - that is, predominantly male and White - but not that seen in early-career surgeons. Positive action is now required in examiner recruitment by the Royal Colleges to ensure that the cohort of MRCS examiners reflects the modern surgical workforce.",

keywords = "surgery, medical education and training, medical ethics",

author = "Ricky Ellis and Brennan, {Peter A} and John Hines and Lee, {Amanda J} and Jennifer Cleland",

note = "Acknowledgements The authors would like to acknowledge Gregory Ayre from the Intercollegiate Committee for Basic Surgical Examinations for his support during this project. Funding Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh, Royal College of Surgeons of Ireland. Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Glasgow and Royal College of Surgeons of England. ",

year = "2023",

month = oct,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1016/j.surge.2023.02.002",

language = "English",

volume = "21",

pages = "273--277",

journal = "The Surgeon",

issn = "1479-666X",

publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Examining the diversity of MRCS examiners

AU - Ellis, Ricky

AU - Brennan, Peter A

AU - Hines, John

AU - Lee, Amanda J

AU - Cleland, Jennifer

N1 - Acknowledgements The authors would like to acknowledge Gregory Ayre from the Intercollegiate Committee for Basic Surgical Examinations for his support during this project. Funding Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh, Royal College of Surgeons of Ireland. Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Glasgow and Royal College of Surgeons of England.

PY - 2023/10/1

Y1 - 2023/10/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: MRCS examiners are the face of the Royal College of Surgeons for early-career surgeons and should therefore represent the workforce they are examining as not to marginalise or negatively impact on the assessment experience of candidates from minoritised groups. This study aimed to explore the diversity of MRCS examiners and whether they represent the demographics of the MRCS candidates.METHODS: A retrospective observational study including all active examiners and examination candidates who attempted MRCS Part A or Part B between January 2020 and July 2021. Self-declared demographic data collected by the Intercollegiate Committee for Basic Surgical Examinations (ICBSE) included gender, sexual orientation, disability status and ethnicity. Following data anonymisation, total group response frequencies were made available to the research team for statistical analysis.RESULTS: Chi-squared analyses showed statistically significant differences in the representation of gender, disability and ethnicity between candidates and examiners (all p < 0.001). Men (83.9% (n = 1121) vs 70.9% (n = 6017) respectively), individuals without disability (98.7% (n = 917) vs 96.1% (n = 6847)) and individuals of White ethnicity (36.6% (n = 346) vs 20.4% (n = 1223)) were significantly overrepresented in the examiners compared to the examination candidates. There was no statistically significant difference in sexual orientation between examiners and candidates (p = 0.712).CONCLUSIONS: Broadly speaking, the socio-demographic profile of MRCS examiners reflects that seen in senior and leadership positions in surgery in the UK - that is, predominantly male and White - but not that seen in early-career surgeons. Positive action is now required in examiner recruitment by the Royal Colleges to ensure that the cohort of MRCS examiners reflects the modern surgical workforce.

AB - BACKGROUND: MRCS examiners are the face of the Royal College of Surgeons for early-career surgeons and should therefore represent the workforce they are examining as not to marginalise or negatively impact on the assessment experience of candidates from minoritised groups. This study aimed to explore the diversity of MRCS examiners and whether they represent the demographics of the MRCS candidates.METHODS: A retrospective observational study including all active examiners and examination candidates who attempted MRCS Part A or Part B between January 2020 and July 2021. Self-declared demographic data collected by the Intercollegiate Committee for Basic Surgical Examinations (ICBSE) included gender, sexual orientation, disability status and ethnicity. Following data anonymisation, total group response frequencies were made available to the research team for statistical analysis.RESULTS: Chi-squared analyses showed statistically significant differences in the representation of gender, disability and ethnicity between candidates and examiners (all p < 0.001). Men (83.9% (n = 1121) vs 70.9% (n = 6017) respectively), individuals without disability (98.7% (n = 917) vs 96.1% (n = 6847)) and individuals of White ethnicity (36.6% (n = 346) vs 20.4% (n = 1223)) were significantly overrepresented in the examiners compared to the examination candidates. There was no statistically significant difference in sexual orientation between examiners and candidates (p = 0.712).CONCLUSIONS: Broadly speaking, the socio-demographic profile of MRCS examiners reflects that seen in senior and leadership positions in surgery in the UK - that is, predominantly male and White - but not that seen in early-career surgeons. Positive action is now required in examiner recruitment by the Royal Colleges to ensure that the cohort of MRCS examiners reflects the modern surgical workforce.

KW - surgery

KW - medical education and training

KW - medical ethics

U2 - 10.1016/j.surge.2023.02.002

DO - 10.1016/j.surge.2023.02.002

M3 - Article

C2 - 36842928

SN - 1479-666X

VL - 21

SP - 273

EP - 277

JO - The Surgeon

JF - The Surgeon

IS - 5

ER -

Examining the diversity of MRCS examiners

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this