Expected satiety influences actual satiety

J. M. Brunstrom, P. J. Rogers, J. F. Burn, J. M. Collingwood, O. M. Maynard, S. D. Brown, N. R. Sell

Research output: Contribution to journalAbstract

Abstract

We explored the hypothesis that the satiety that we expect a food to confer can influence the actual satiety that is experienced after it has been consumed. In Experiment 1 we manipulated ‘expected satiety’ by telling participants (N = 32) that a ‘fruit smoothie’ contained either a small or a large amount of fruit. All participants consumed the same smoothie. Nevertheless, those in the ‘large amount’ condition reported significantly lower hunger, 0, 1, 2, and 3 h after meal termination. In Experiment 2 we manipulated information about the volume of soup consumed in a meal. Before lunch, participants were shown either 300 ml or 500 ml of soup. Orthogonal to this, half consumed 300 ml and half consumed 500 ml. This process yielded four separate groups (25 participants in each). Covert and independent manipulation of the ‘actual’ and ‘perceived’ soup portion was achieved using a computer-controlled peristaltic pump. Immediately after lunch, self-reported hunger was predicted by the actual and not the perceived amount of soup consumed. However, 2 and 3 h after meal termination this pattern was reversed. Hunger was predicted by the perceived and not the actual amount. Together, these findings confirm a role for ‘expected satiety’ and show how memory for a recent eating episode can affect satiety in the inter-meal interval.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)637
Number of pages1
JournalAppetite
Volume54
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2010

Fingerprint

Hunger
Meals
Lunch
Fruit
Eating
Food

Cite this

Brunstrom, J. M., Rogers, P. J., Burn, J. F., Collingwood, J. M., Maynard, O. M., Brown, S. D., & Sell, N. R. (2010). Expected satiety influences actual satiety. Appetite, 54(3), 637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2010.04.033

Expected satiety influences actual satiety. / Brunstrom, J. M.; Rogers, P. J.; Burn, J. F.; Collingwood, J. M.; Maynard, O. M.; Brown, S. D.; Sell, N. R.

In: Appetite, Vol. 54, No. 3, 06.2010, p. 637.

Research output: Contribution to journalAbstract

Brunstrom, JM, Rogers, PJ, Burn, JF, Collingwood, JM, Maynard, OM, Brown, SD & Sell, NR 2010, 'Expected satiety influences actual satiety', Appetite, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2010.04.033
Brunstrom JM, Rogers PJ, Burn JF, Collingwood JM, Maynard OM, Brown SD et al. Expected satiety influences actual satiety. Appetite. 2010 Jun;54(3):637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2010.04.033
Brunstrom, J. M. ; Rogers, P. J. ; Burn, J. F. ; Collingwood, J. M. ; Maynard, O. M. ; Brown, S. D. ; Sell, N. R. / Expected satiety influences actual satiety. In: Appetite. 2010 ; Vol. 54, No. 3. pp. 637.
@article{f866d755525246819583c6d7aa78e910,
title = "Expected satiety influences actual satiety",
abstract = "We explored the hypothesis that the satiety that we expect a food to confer can influence the actual satiety that is experienced after it has been consumed. In Experiment 1 we manipulated ‘expected satiety’ by telling participants (N = 32) that a ‘fruit smoothie’ contained either a small or a large amount of fruit. All participants consumed the same smoothie. Nevertheless, those in the ‘large amount’ condition reported significantly lower hunger, 0, 1, 2, and 3 h after meal termination. In Experiment 2 we manipulated information about the volume of soup consumed in a meal. Before lunch, participants were shown either 300 ml or 500 ml of soup. Orthogonal to this, half consumed 300 ml and half consumed 500 ml. This process yielded four separate groups (25 participants in each). Covert and independent manipulation of the ‘actual’ and ‘perceived’ soup portion was achieved using a computer-controlled peristaltic pump. Immediately after lunch, self-reported hunger was predicted by the actual and not the perceived amount of soup consumed. However, 2 and 3 h after meal termination this pattern was reversed. Hunger was predicted by the perceived and not the actual amount. Together, these findings confirm a role for ‘expected satiety’ and show how memory for a recent eating episode can affect satiety in the inter-meal interval.",
author = "Brunstrom, {J. M.} and Rogers, {P. J.} and Burn, {J. F.} and Collingwood, {J. M.} and Maynard, {O. M.} and Brown, {S. D.} and Sell, {N. R.}",
year = "2010",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.appet.2010.04.033",
language = "English",
volume = "54",
pages = "637",
journal = "Appetite",
issn = "0195-6663",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Expected satiety influences actual satiety

AU - Brunstrom, J. M.

AU - Rogers, P. J.

AU - Burn, J. F.

AU - Collingwood, J. M.

AU - Maynard, O. M.

AU - Brown, S. D.

AU - Sell, N. R.

PY - 2010/6

Y1 - 2010/6

N2 - We explored the hypothesis that the satiety that we expect a food to confer can influence the actual satiety that is experienced after it has been consumed. In Experiment 1 we manipulated ‘expected satiety’ by telling participants (N = 32) that a ‘fruit smoothie’ contained either a small or a large amount of fruit. All participants consumed the same smoothie. Nevertheless, those in the ‘large amount’ condition reported significantly lower hunger, 0, 1, 2, and 3 h after meal termination. In Experiment 2 we manipulated information about the volume of soup consumed in a meal. Before lunch, participants were shown either 300 ml or 500 ml of soup. Orthogonal to this, half consumed 300 ml and half consumed 500 ml. This process yielded four separate groups (25 participants in each). Covert and independent manipulation of the ‘actual’ and ‘perceived’ soup portion was achieved using a computer-controlled peristaltic pump. Immediately after lunch, self-reported hunger was predicted by the actual and not the perceived amount of soup consumed. However, 2 and 3 h after meal termination this pattern was reversed. Hunger was predicted by the perceived and not the actual amount. Together, these findings confirm a role for ‘expected satiety’ and show how memory for a recent eating episode can affect satiety in the inter-meal interval.

AB - We explored the hypothesis that the satiety that we expect a food to confer can influence the actual satiety that is experienced after it has been consumed. In Experiment 1 we manipulated ‘expected satiety’ by telling participants (N = 32) that a ‘fruit smoothie’ contained either a small or a large amount of fruit. All participants consumed the same smoothie. Nevertheless, those in the ‘large amount’ condition reported significantly lower hunger, 0, 1, 2, and 3 h after meal termination. In Experiment 2 we manipulated information about the volume of soup consumed in a meal. Before lunch, participants were shown either 300 ml or 500 ml of soup. Orthogonal to this, half consumed 300 ml and half consumed 500 ml. This process yielded four separate groups (25 participants in each). Covert and independent manipulation of the ‘actual’ and ‘perceived’ soup portion was achieved using a computer-controlled peristaltic pump. Immediately after lunch, self-reported hunger was predicted by the actual and not the perceived amount of soup consumed. However, 2 and 3 h after meal termination this pattern was reversed. Hunger was predicted by the perceived and not the actual amount. Together, these findings confirm a role for ‘expected satiety’ and show how memory for a recent eating episode can affect satiety in the inter-meal interval.

U2 - 10.1016/j.appet.2010.04.033

DO - 10.1016/j.appet.2010.04.033

M3 - Abstract

VL - 54

SP - 637

JO - Appetite

JF - Appetite

SN - 0195-6663

IS - 3

ER -