Experiences and views of specialist registrars in geriatric medicine on 'do not attempt resuscitation' decisions: a sea of uncertainty?

P K Myint, S Miles, D A Halliday, L K Bowker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent cultural changes place doctors under increasing pressure to work with their patients to reach decisions about end-of-life care.

AIM: To survey the experience, practice and opinions of specialist registrars (SPRs) in geriatric medicine regarding 'do not attempt resuscitation' (DNAR) decisions.

DESIGN: Postal questionnaire survey.

METHODS: A questionnaire was mailed to all members registered as trainees (n = 408) with the British Geriatrics Society in November 2003; a reminder was sent nine weeks later. Responses were analysed using both quantitative and qualitative (thematic) approaches.

RESULTS: Response rate was 62% (251/408), of whom 235 were still SpRs. Respondents played a major role in DNAR decision-making in their day-to-day clinical practice. Over a third of respondents did not feel that locally available guidelines were helpful. More than half sometimes disagreed with their consultants' decision, and a fifth were concerned about the possibility of complaints regarding the decisions they made. The majority felt uncomfortable discussing the issue with the patient, and were more likely to discuss the issue with relatives than with patients.

DISCUSSION: Further support and training may improve confidence and positive experiences in relation to DNAR decision-making among training-grade doctors in the UK.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)691-700
Number of pages10
JournalQJM
Volume99
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2006

Fingerprint

Resuscitation Orders
Geriatrics
Uncertainty
Medicine
Decision Making
Training Support
Terminal Care
Consultants
Surveys and Questionnaires
Guidelines
Pressure

Keywords

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Attitude of Health Personnel
  • Decision Making
  • Geriatrics
  • Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
  • Humans
  • Medicine
  • Middle Aged
  • Practice Guidelines as Topic
  • Resuscitation Orders
  • Specialization
  • Surveys and Questionnaires

Cite this

Experiences and views of specialist registrars in geriatric medicine on 'do not attempt resuscitation' decisions : a sea of uncertainty? / Myint, P K; Miles, S; Halliday, D A; Bowker, L K.

In: QJM, Vol. 99, No. 10, 10.2006, p. 691-700.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{50133ed8aa2f4503b9c0a352af4c75d7,
title = "Experiences and views of specialist registrars in geriatric medicine on 'do not attempt resuscitation' decisions: a sea of uncertainty?",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Recent cultural changes place doctors under increasing pressure to work with their patients to reach decisions about end-of-life care.AIM: To survey the experience, practice and opinions of specialist registrars (SPRs) in geriatric medicine regarding 'do not attempt resuscitation' (DNAR) decisions.DESIGN: Postal questionnaire survey.METHODS: A questionnaire was mailed to all members registered as trainees (n = 408) with the British Geriatrics Society in November 2003; a reminder was sent nine weeks later. Responses were analysed using both quantitative and qualitative (thematic) approaches.RESULTS: Response rate was 62{\%} (251/408), of whom 235 were still SpRs. Respondents played a major role in DNAR decision-making in their day-to-day clinical practice. Over a third of respondents did not feel that locally available guidelines were helpful. More than half sometimes disagreed with their consultants' decision, and a fifth were concerned about the possibility of complaints regarding the decisions they made. The majority felt uncomfortable discussing the issue with the patient, and were more likely to discuss the issue with relatives than with patients.DISCUSSION: Further support and training may improve confidence and positive experiences in relation to DNAR decision-making among training-grade doctors in the UK.",
keywords = "Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Attitude of Health Personnel, Decision Making, Geriatrics, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Humans, Medicine, Middle Aged, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Resuscitation Orders, Specialization, Surveys and Questionnaires",
author = "Myint, {P K} and S Miles and Halliday, {D A} and Bowker, {L K}",
year = "2006",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1093/qjmed/hcl096",
language = "English",
volume = "99",
pages = "691--700",
journal = "QJM",
issn = "1460-2725",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Experiences and views of specialist registrars in geriatric medicine on 'do not attempt resuscitation' decisions

T2 - a sea of uncertainty?

AU - Myint, P K

AU - Miles, S

AU - Halliday, D A

AU - Bowker, L K

PY - 2006/10

Y1 - 2006/10

N2 - BACKGROUND: Recent cultural changes place doctors under increasing pressure to work with their patients to reach decisions about end-of-life care.AIM: To survey the experience, practice and opinions of specialist registrars (SPRs) in geriatric medicine regarding 'do not attempt resuscitation' (DNAR) decisions.DESIGN: Postal questionnaire survey.METHODS: A questionnaire was mailed to all members registered as trainees (n = 408) with the British Geriatrics Society in November 2003; a reminder was sent nine weeks later. Responses were analysed using both quantitative and qualitative (thematic) approaches.RESULTS: Response rate was 62% (251/408), of whom 235 were still SpRs. Respondents played a major role in DNAR decision-making in their day-to-day clinical practice. Over a third of respondents did not feel that locally available guidelines were helpful. More than half sometimes disagreed with their consultants' decision, and a fifth were concerned about the possibility of complaints regarding the decisions they made. The majority felt uncomfortable discussing the issue with the patient, and were more likely to discuss the issue with relatives than with patients.DISCUSSION: Further support and training may improve confidence and positive experiences in relation to DNAR decision-making among training-grade doctors in the UK.

AB - BACKGROUND: Recent cultural changes place doctors under increasing pressure to work with their patients to reach decisions about end-of-life care.AIM: To survey the experience, practice and opinions of specialist registrars (SPRs) in geriatric medicine regarding 'do not attempt resuscitation' (DNAR) decisions.DESIGN: Postal questionnaire survey.METHODS: A questionnaire was mailed to all members registered as trainees (n = 408) with the British Geriatrics Society in November 2003; a reminder was sent nine weeks later. Responses were analysed using both quantitative and qualitative (thematic) approaches.RESULTS: Response rate was 62% (251/408), of whom 235 were still SpRs. Respondents played a major role in DNAR decision-making in their day-to-day clinical practice. Over a third of respondents did not feel that locally available guidelines were helpful. More than half sometimes disagreed with their consultants' decision, and a fifth were concerned about the possibility of complaints regarding the decisions they made. The majority felt uncomfortable discussing the issue with the patient, and were more likely to discuss the issue with relatives than with patients.DISCUSSION: Further support and training may improve confidence and positive experiences in relation to DNAR decision-making among training-grade doctors in the UK.

KW - Adolescent

KW - Adult

KW - Aged

KW - Aged, 80 and over

KW - Attitude of Health Personnel

KW - Decision Making

KW - Geriatrics

KW - Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice

KW - Humans

KW - Medicine

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Practice Guidelines as Topic

KW - Resuscitation Orders

KW - Specialization

KW - Surveys and Questionnaires

U2 - 10.1093/qjmed/hcl096

DO - 10.1093/qjmed/hcl096

M3 - Article

C2 - 16956927

VL - 99

SP - 691

EP - 700

JO - QJM

JF - QJM

SN - 1460-2725

IS - 10

ER -