Explaining the EUA-CER Spread

Marc Gronwald, Beat Hintermann

Research output: Working paper

Abstract

Because of a link between the EU ETS and the Kyoto Flexible Mechanisms, the emission certificates traded on these markets are in principle interchangeable assets; despite of this, a persistent price difference exists. We explain this price spread using a theoretical model that combines three features: A binding limit for the use of Kyoto offsets within the EU ETS; a disconnect between the price of offsets and their marginal cost of production due to institutional reasons; and uncertainty about future supply and demand of offsets. Our model expresses the offset price as an average of the EUA price and an offset's outside value, weighted by the probability of a binding import limit. Using a detailed dataset on expected offset supply and demand, we provide empirical support for our theory of offset price formation. In addition, we find evidence for informational frictions governing the use of offsets within the EU ETS.
Original languageEnglish
PublisherCESifo Group
Volume5795
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Cost of production
Price formation
Import
Assets
Uncertainty
Friction
Marginal cost

Keywords

  • EU ETS
  • clean development mechanism
  • offset demand
  • EAU-CER spread

Cite this

Gronwald, M., & Hintermann, B. (2016). Explaining the EUA-CER Spread. CESifo Group.

Explaining the EUA-CER Spread. / Gronwald, Marc; Hintermann, Beat.

CESifo Group, 2016.

Research output: Working paper

Gronwald, M & Hintermann, B 2016 'Explaining the EUA-CER Spread' CESifo Group.
Gronwald M, Hintermann B. Explaining the EUA-CER Spread. CESifo Group. 2016.
Gronwald, Marc ; Hintermann, Beat. / Explaining the EUA-CER Spread. CESifo Group, 2016.
@techreport{db3caeb48902417bb8509e97bcccbeaf,
title = "Explaining the EUA-CER Spread",
abstract = "Because of a link between the EU ETS and the Kyoto Flexible Mechanisms, the emission certificates traded on these markets are in principle interchangeable assets; despite of this, a persistent price difference exists. We explain this price spread using a theoretical model that combines three features: A binding limit for the use of Kyoto offsets within the EU ETS; a disconnect between the price of offsets and their marginal cost of production due to institutional reasons; and uncertainty about future supply and demand of offsets. Our model expresses the offset price as an average of the EUA price and an offset's outside value, weighted by the probability of a binding import limit. Using a detailed dataset on expected offset supply and demand, we provide empirical support for our theory of offset price formation. In addition, we find evidence for informational frictions governing the use of offsets within the EU ETS.",
keywords = "EU ETS, clean development mechanism, offset demand, EAU-CER spread",
author = "Marc Gronwald and Beat Hintermann",
year = "2016",
language = "English",
volume = "5795",
publisher = "CESifo Group",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "CESifo Group",

}

TY - UNPB

T1 - Explaining the EUA-CER Spread

AU - Gronwald, Marc

AU - Hintermann, Beat

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Because of a link between the EU ETS and the Kyoto Flexible Mechanisms, the emission certificates traded on these markets are in principle interchangeable assets; despite of this, a persistent price difference exists. We explain this price spread using a theoretical model that combines three features: A binding limit for the use of Kyoto offsets within the EU ETS; a disconnect between the price of offsets and their marginal cost of production due to institutional reasons; and uncertainty about future supply and demand of offsets. Our model expresses the offset price as an average of the EUA price and an offset's outside value, weighted by the probability of a binding import limit. Using a detailed dataset on expected offset supply and demand, we provide empirical support for our theory of offset price formation. In addition, we find evidence for informational frictions governing the use of offsets within the EU ETS.

AB - Because of a link between the EU ETS and the Kyoto Flexible Mechanisms, the emission certificates traded on these markets are in principle interchangeable assets; despite of this, a persistent price difference exists. We explain this price spread using a theoretical model that combines three features: A binding limit for the use of Kyoto offsets within the EU ETS; a disconnect between the price of offsets and their marginal cost of production due to institutional reasons; and uncertainty about future supply and demand of offsets. Our model expresses the offset price as an average of the EUA price and an offset's outside value, weighted by the probability of a binding import limit. Using a detailed dataset on expected offset supply and demand, we provide empirical support for our theory of offset price formation. In addition, we find evidence for informational frictions governing the use of offsets within the EU ETS.

KW - EU ETS

KW - clean development mechanism

KW - offset demand

KW - EAU-CER spread

M3 - Working paper

VL - 5795

BT - Explaining the EUA-CER Spread

PB - CESifo Group

ER -