Exploring susceptibility measures to persuasion

John Paul Vargheese, Matthew Collinson*, Judith Masthoff

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

There is increasing evidence that indicates how personalising persuasive strategies may increase the effectiveness of persuasive technologies
and behaviour change interventions. This has led to a wide range of studies
exploring susceptibility to persuasion which highlight the role of individual
differences. Measuring susceptibility to persuasion, while accounting for individual differences can be challenging, particularly where persuasive strategies may be considered similar due to their underlying components. In this paper,we present a study exploring susceptibility to Cialdini’s principles of persuasion with a focus on how we can distinguish susceptibility measures between the most recently identified Unity principle and Social proof. This study
was conducted using an online survey incorporating susceptibility measures to all seven Cialdini principles and a measure of the actual effectiveness of seven
corresponding persuasive strategies. Our results indicate that while we are able
to distinguish susceptibility measures between Unity and Social proof, together
with Commitment, Scarcity and Reciprocity, we were unable to obtain these
with susceptibility measures for Liking and Authority.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationPersuasive 2020
Subtitle of host publicationProceedings of the 15th International Conference on Persuasive Technologies
EditorsSandra Gram-Hansen, Tanja Svarre, Cees Midden
PublisherSpringer
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 4 Feb 2020
EventPersuasive 2020: 15th International Conference on Persuasive Technology - Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
Duration: 20 Apr 202023 Apr 2020

Publication series

NameLecture Notes in Computer Science
PublisherSpringer
ISSN (Print)0302-9743

Conference

ConferencePersuasive 2020
CountryDenmark
CityAalborg
Period20/04/2023/04/20

Fingerprint

Persuasive Communication
Individuality

Keywords

  • susceptibility
  • persuasion
  • influence
  • personalisation

Cite this

Vargheese, J. P., Collinson, M., & Masthoff, J. (Accepted/In press). Exploring susceptibility measures to persuasion. In S. Gram-Hansen, T. Svarre, & C. Midden (Eds.), Persuasive 2020: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Persuasive Technologies (Lecture Notes in Computer Science). Springer .

Exploring susceptibility measures to persuasion. / Vargheese, John Paul; Collinson, Matthew; Masthoff, Judith.

Persuasive 2020: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Persuasive Technologies. ed. / Sandra Gram-Hansen; Tanja Svarre; Cees Midden. Springer , 2020. (Lecture Notes in Computer Science).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Vargheese, JP, Collinson, M & Masthoff, J 2020, Exploring susceptibility measures to persuasion. in S Gram-Hansen, T Svarre & C Midden (eds), Persuasive 2020: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Persuasive Technologies. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer , Persuasive 2020, Aalborg, Denmark, 20/04/20.
Vargheese JP, Collinson M, Masthoff J. Exploring susceptibility measures to persuasion. In Gram-Hansen S, Svarre T, Midden C, editors, Persuasive 2020: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Persuasive Technologies. Springer . 2020. (Lecture Notes in Computer Science).
Vargheese, John Paul ; Collinson, Matthew ; Masthoff, Judith. / Exploring susceptibility measures to persuasion. Persuasive 2020: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Persuasive Technologies. editor / Sandra Gram-Hansen ; Tanja Svarre ; Cees Midden. Springer , 2020. (Lecture Notes in Computer Science).
@inproceedings{2a10ddebbdea471891fce670d22ae05a,
title = "Exploring susceptibility measures to persuasion",
abstract = "There is increasing evidence that indicates how personalising persuasive strategies may increase the effectiveness of persuasive technologiesand behaviour change interventions. This has led to a wide range of studiesexploring susceptibility to persuasion which highlight the role of individualdifferences. Measuring susceptibility to persuasion, while accounting for individual differences can be challenging, particularly where persuasive strategies may be considered similar due to their underlying components. In this paper,we present a study exploring susceptibility to Cialdini’s principles of persuasion with a focus on how we can distinguish susceptibility measures between the most recently identified Unity principle and Social proof. This study was conducted using an online survey incorporating susceptibility measures to all seven Cialdini principles and a measure of the actual effectiveness of sevencorresponding persuasive strategies. Our results indicate that while we are ableto distinguish susceptibility measures between Unity and Social proof, togetherwith Commitment, Scarcity and Reciprocity, we were unable to obtain thesewith susceptibility measures for Liking and Authority.",
keywords = "susceptibility, persuasion, influence, personalisation",
author = "Vargheese, {John Paul} and Matthew Collinson and Judith Masthoff",
year = "2020",
month = "2",
day = "4",
language = "English",
series = "Lecture Notes in Computer Science",
publisher = "Springer",
editor = "Gram-Hansen, {Sandra } and Svarre, {Tanja } and Midden, {Cees }",
booktitle = "Persuasive 2020",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Exploring susceptibility measures to persuasion

AU - Vargheese, John Paul

AU - Collinson, Matthew

AU - Masthoff, Judith

PY - 2020/2/4

Y1 - 2020/2/4

N2 - There is increasing evidence that indicates how personalising persuasive strategies may increase the effectiveness of persuasive technologiesand behaviour change interventions. This has led to a wide range of studiesexploring susceptibility to persuasion which highlight the role of individualdifferences. Measuring susceptibility to persuasion, while accounting for individual differences can be challenging, particularly where persuasive strategies may be considered similar due to their underlying components. In this paper,we present a study exploring susceptibility to Cialdini’s principles of persuasion with a focus on how we can distinguish susceptibility measures between the most recently identified Unity principle and Social proof. This study was conducted using an online survey incorporating susceptibility measures to all seven Cialdini principles and a measure of the actual effectiveness of sevencorresponding persuasive strategies. Our results indicate that while we are ableto distinguish susceptibility measures between Unity and Social proof, togetherwith Commitment, Scarcity and Reciprocity, we were unable to obtain thesewith susceptibility measures for Liking and Authority.

AB - There is increasing evidence that indicates how personalising persuasive strategies may increase the effectiveness of persuasive technologiesand behaviour change interventions. This has led to a wide range of studiesexploring susceptibility to persuasion which highlight the role of individualdifferences. Measuring susceptibility to persuasion, while accounting for individual differences can be challenging, particularly where persuasive strategies may be considered similar due to their underlying components. In this paper,we present a study exploring susceptibility to Cialdini’s principles of persuasion with a focus on how we can distinguish susceptibility measures between the most recently identified Unity principle and Social proof. This study was conducted using an online survey incorporating susceptibility measures to all seven Cialdini principles and a measure of the actual effectiveness of sevencorresponding persuasive strategies. Our results indicate that while we are ableto distinguish susceptibility measures between Unity and Social proof, togetherwith Commitment, Scarcity and Reciprocity, we were unable to obtain thesewith susceptibility measures for Liking and Authority.

KW - susceptibility

KW - persuasion

KW - influence

KW - personalisation

M3 - Conference contribution

T3 - Lecture Notes in Computer Science

BT - Persuasive 2020

A2 - Gram-Hansen, Sandra

A2 - Svarre, Tanja

A2 - Midden, Cees

PB - Springer

ER -