Exploring the impact and use of patients' feedback about their care experiences in general practice settings - a realist synthesis

Deborah J. Baldie (Corresponding Author), Bruce Guthrie, Vikki Entwistle, Thilo Kroll

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)
6 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background
Policy encourages health care providers to listen and respond to feedback from patients, expecting that it will enhance care experiences. Enhancement of patients’ experiences may not yet be a reality, particularly in primary health care settings.
Objective
To identify the issues that influence the use and impact of feedback in this context.
Design and Setting
A realist synthesis of studies of the use of patient feedback within primary health care settings.
Methods
Structured review of published studies between 1971 and January 2015.
Results
Eighteen studies were reported in 20 papers. Eleven studies reported patient survey scores as a primary outcome. There is little evidence that formal patient feedback led to enhanced experiences. The likelihood of patient feedback to health care staff stimulating improvements in future patients’ experiences appears to be influenced predominantly by staff perceptions of the purpose of such feedback; the validity and type of data that is collected; and where, when and how it is presented to primary health care teams or practitioners and teams’ capacity to change.
Conclusions
There is limited research into how patient feedback has been used in primary health care practices or its usefulness as a stimulant to improve health care experience. Using a realist synthesis approach, we have identified a number of contextual and intervention-related factors that appear to influence the likelihood that practitioners will listen to, act on and achieve improvements in patient experience. Consideration of these may support research and improvement work in this area.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)13-21
Number of pages9
JournalFamily Practice
Volume35
Issue number1
Early online date3 Aug 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2018

Fingerprint

General Practice
Primary Health Care
Delivery of Health Care
Patient Care Team
Research
Health Personnel

Keywords

  • Access and evaluation
  • health care
  • health care quality
  • patient advocacy
  • patient satisfaction
  • quality assurance
  • quality of health care
  • Total quality management

Cite this

Exploring the impact and use of patients' feedback about their care experiences in general practice settings - a realist synthesis. / Baldie, Deborah J. (Corresponding Author); Guthrie, Bruce; Entwistle, Vikki; Kroll, Thilo .

In: Family Practice, Vol. 35, No. 1, 02.2018, p. 13-21.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Baldie, Deborah J. ; Guthrie, Bruce ; Entwistle, Vikki ; Kroll, Thilo . / Exploring the impact and use of patients' feedback about their care experiences in general practice settings - a realist synthesis. In: Family Practice. 2018 ; Vol. 35, No. 1. pp. 13-21.
@article{76b254d8824d4d61bbef71da8e1a9b6e,
title = "Exploring the impact and use of patients' feedback about their care experiences in general practice settings - a realist synthesis",
abstract = "BackgroundPolicy encourages health care providers to listen and respond to feedback from patients, expecting that it will enhance care experiences. Enhancement of patients’ experiences may not yet be a reality, particularly in primary health care settings.ObjectiveTo identify the issues that influence the use and impact of feedback in this context.Design and SettingA realist synthesis of studies of the use of patient feedback within primary health care settings.MethodsStructured review of published studies between 1971 and January 2015.ResultsEighteen studies were reported in 20 papers. Eleven studies reported patient survey scores as a primary outcome. There is little evidence that formal patient feedback led to enhanced experiences. The likelihood of patient feedback to health care staff stimulating improvements in future patients’ experiences appears to be influenced predominantly by staff perceptions of the purpose of such feedback; the validity and type of data that is collected; and where, when and how it is presented to primary health care teams or practitioners and teams’ capacity to change.ConclusionsThere is limited research into how patient feedback has been used in primary health care practices or its usefulness as a stimulant to improve health care experience. Using a realist synthesis approach, we have identified a number of contextual and intervention-related factors that appear to influence the likelihood that practitioners will listen to, act on and achieve improvements in patient experience. Consideration of these may support research and improvement work in this area.",
keywords = "Access and evaluation, health care, health care quality, patient advocacy, patient satisfaction, quality assurance, quality of health care, Total quality management",
author = "Baldie, {Deborah J.} and Bruce Guthrie and Vikki Entwistle and Thilo Kroll",
note = "Chief Scientist Office Doctoral Training Fellowship in Health Services and Health of the Public Research. Ref: DTF/08/07",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1093/fampra/cmx067",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "13--21",
journal = "Family Practice",
issn = "0263-2136",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Exploring the impact and use of patients' feedback about their care experiences in general practice settings - a realist synthesis

AU - Baldie, Deborah J.

AU - Guthrie, Bruce

AU - Entwistle, Vikki

AU - Kroll, Thilo

N1 - Chief Scientist Office Doctoral Training Fellowship in Health Services and Health of the Public Research. Ref: DTF/08/07

PY - 2018/2

Y1 - 2018/2

N2 - BackgroundPolicy encourages health care providers to listen and respond to feedback from patients, expecting that it will enhance care experiences. Enhancement of patients’ experiences may not yet be a reality, particularly in primary health care settings.ObjectiveTo identify the issues that influence the use and impact of feedback in this context.Design and SettingA realist synthesis of studies of the use of patient feedback within primary health care settings.MethodsStructured review of published studies between 1971 and January 2015.ResultsEighteen studies were reported in 20 papers. Eleven studies reported patient survey scores as a primary outcome. There is little evidence that formal patient feedback led to enhanced experiences. The likelihood of patient feedback to health care staff stimulating improvements in future patients’ experiences appears to be influenced predominantly by staff perceptions of the purpose of such feedback; the validity and type of data that is collected; and where, when and how it is presented to primary health care teams or practitioners and teams’ capacity to change.ConclusionsThere is limited research into how patient feedback has been used in primary health care practices or its usefulness as a stimulant to improve health care experience. Using a realist synthesis approach, we have identified a number of contextual and intervention-related factors that appear to influence the likelihood that practitioners will listen to, act on and achieve improvements in patient experience. Consideration of these may support research and improvement work in this area.

AB - BackgroundPolicy encourages health care providers to listen and respond to feedback from patients, expecting that it will enhance care experiences. Enhancement of patients’ experiences may not yet be a reality, particularly in primary health care settings.ObjectiveTo identify the issues that influence the use and impact of feedback in this context.Design and SettingA realist synthesis of studies of the use of patient feedback within primary health care settings.MethodsStructured review of published studies between 1971 and January 2015.ResultsEighteen studies were reported in 20 papers. Eleven studies reported patient survey scores as a primary outcome. There is little evidence that formal patient feedback led to enhanced experiences. The likelihood of patient feedback to health care staff stimulating improvements in future patients’ experiences appears to be influenced predominantly by staff perceptions of the purpose of such feedback; the validity and type of data that is collected; and where, when and how it is presented to primary health care teams or practitioners and teams’ capacity to change.ConclusionsThere is limited research into how patient feedback has been used in primary health care practices or its usefulness as a stimulant to improve health care experience. Using a realist synthesis approach, we have identified a number of contextual and intervention-related factors that appear to influence the likelihood that practitioners will listen to, act on and achieve improvements in patient experience. Consideration of these may support research and improvement work in this area.

KW - Access and evaluation

KW - health care

KW - health care quality

KW - patient advocacy

KW - patient satisfaction

KW - quality assurance

KW - quality of health care

KW - Total quality management

U2 - 10.1093/fampra/cmx067

DO - 10.1093/fampra/cmx067

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 13

EP - 21

JO - Family Practice

JF - Family Practice

SN - 0263-2136

IS - 1

ER -