Exploring the role of quantitative feedback in inhaler technique education

a cluster-randomised, two-arm, parallel-group, repeated-measures study

Mariam Toumas-Shehata, David Price, Iman Amin Basheti, Sinthia Bosnic-Anticevich

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Feedback is a critical component of any educational intervention. When it comes to feedback associated with inhaler technique education, there is a lack of knowledge on its role or its potential to solve the major issue of poor inhaler technique.

AIMS: This study aims to explore the role of feedback in inhaler technique education and its impact on the inhaler technique of patients over time.

METHODS: A parallel-group, repeated-measures study was conducted in the community pharmacy in which the effectiveness of current best practice inhaler technique education utilising qualitative visual feedback (Group 1) was compared with a combination of qualitative and quantitative visual feedback (Group 2). The impact of these two interventions on inhaler technique maintenance was evaluated. Community pharmacists were randomly allocated to recruit people with asthma who were using a dry powder inhaler. At Visit 1 their inhaler technique was evaluated and education delivered and they were followed up at Visit 2 (1 month later).

RESULTS: Both educational interventions resulted in an increase in the proportion of patients with correct inhaler technique: from 4% to 51% in Group 1 and from 6% to 83% in Group 2 (Pearson's Chi-Squared, P=0.03, n=49, and Pearson's Chi-Squared, P=0.01, n=48, respectively). The magnitude of improvement was statistically significantly higher for Group 2 compared with Group 1 (n=97, P=0.02, Pearson's Chi-Square test).

CONCLUSIONS: The nature of feedback has an impact on the effectiveness of inhaler technique education with regard to correct inhaler technique maintenance over time.

Original languageEnglish
Article number14071
Journalnpj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine
Volume24
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 13 Nov 2014

Fingerprint

Nebulizers and Vaporizers
Education
Sensory Feedback
Maintenance
Dry Powder Inhalers
Pharmacies
Chi-Square Distribution
Practice Guidelines
Pharmacists
Asthma

Cite this

Exploring the role of quantitative feedback in inhaler technique education : a cluster-randomised, two-arm, parallel-group, repeated-measures study. / Toumas-Shehata, Mariam; Price, David; Amin Basheti, Iman; Bosnic-Anticevich, Sinthia.

In: npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine, Vol. 24, 14071, 13.11.2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1058b2daf2bc4e5591c93206fff4791c,
title = "Exploring the role of quantitative feedback in inhaler technique education: a cluster-randomised, two-arm, parallel-group, repeated-measures study",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Feedback is a critical component of any educational intervention. When it comes to feedback associated with inhaler technique education, there is a lack of knowledge on its role or its potential to solve the major issue of poor inhaler technique.AIMS: This study aims to explore the role of feedback in inhaler technique education and its impact on the inhaler technique of patients over time.METHODS: A parallel-group, repeated-measures study was conducted in the community pharmacy in which the effectiveness of current best practice inhaler technique education utilising qualitative visual feedback (Group 1) was compared with a combination of qualitative and quantitative visual feedback (Group 2). The impact of these two interventions on inhaler technique maintenance was evaluated. Community pharmacists were randomly allocated to recruit people with asthma who were using a dry powder inhaler. At Visit 1 their inhaler technique was evaluated and education delivered and they were followed up at Visit 2 (1 month later).RESULTS: Both educational interventions resulted in an increase in the proportion of patients with correct inhaler technique: from 4{\%} to 51{\%} in Group 1 and from 6{\%} to 83{\%} in Group 2 (Pearson's Chi-Squared, P=0.03, n=49, and Pearson's Chi-Squared, P=0.01, n=48, respectively). The magnitude of improvement was statistically significantly higher for Group 2 compared with Group 1 (n=97, P=0.02, Pearson's Chi-Square test).CONCLUSIONS: The nature of feedback has an impact on the effectiveness of inhaler technique education with regard to correct inhaler technique maintenance over time.",
author = "Mariam Toumas-Shehata and David Price and {Amin Basheti}, Iman and Sinthia Bosnic-Anticevich",
year = "2014",
month = "11",
day = "13",
doi = "10.1038/npjpcrm.2014.71",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
journal = "npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine",
issn = "2055-1010",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Exploring the role of quantitative feedback in inhaler technique education

T2 - a cluster-randomised, two-arm, parallel-group, repeated-measures study

AU - Toumas-Shehata, Mariam

AU - Price, David

AU - Amin Basheti, Iman

AU - Bosnic-Anticevich, Sinthia

PY - 2014/11/13

Y1 - 2014/11/13

N2 - BACKGROUND: Feedback is a critical component of any educational intervention. When it comes to feedback associated with inhaler technique education, there is a lack of knowledge on its role or its potential to solve the major issue of poor inhaler technique.AIMS: This study aims to explore the role of feedback in inhaler technique education and its impact on the inhaler technique of patients over time.METHODS: A parallel-group, repeated-measures study was conducted in the community pharmacy in which the effectiveness of current best practice inhaler technique education utilising qualitative visual feedback (Group 1) was compared with a combination of qualitative and quantitative visual feedback (Group 2). The impact of these two interventions on inhaler technique maintenance was evaluated. Community pharmacists were randomly allocated to recruit people with asthma who were using a dry powder inhaler. At Visit 1 their inhaler technique was evaluated and education delivered and they were followed up at Visit 2 (1 month later).RESULTS: Both educational interventions resulted in an increase in the proportion of patients with correct inhaler technique: from 4% to 51% in Group 1 and from 6% to 83% in Group 2 (Pearson's Chi-Squared, P=0.03, n=49, and Pearson's Chi-Squared, P=0.01, n=48, respectively). The magnitude of improvement was statistically significantly higher for Group 2 compared with Group 1 (n=97, P=0.02, Pearson's Chi-Square test).CONCLUSIONS: The nature of feedback has an impact on the effectiveness of inhaler technique education with regard to correct inhaler technique maintenance over time.

AB - BACKGROUND: Feedback is a critical component of any educational intervention. When it comes to feedback associated with inhaler technique education, there is a lack of knowledge on its role or its potential to solve the major issue of poor inhaler technique.AIMS: This study aims to explore the role of feedback in inhaler technique education and its impact on the inhaler technique of patients over time.METHODS: A parallel-group, repeated-measures study was conducted in the community pharmacy in which the effectiveness of current best practice inhaler technique education utilising qualitative visual feedback (Group 1) was compared with a combination of qualitative and quantitative visual feedback (Group 2). The impact of these two interventions on inhaler technique maintenance was evaluated. Community pharmacists were randomly allocated to recruit people with asthma who were using a dry powder inhaler. At Visit 1 their inhaler technique was evaluated and education delivered and they were followed up at Visit 2 (1 month later).RESULTS: Both educational interventions resulted in an increase in the proportion of patients with correct inhaler technique: from 4% to 51% in Group 1 and from 6% to 83% in Group 2 (Pearson's Chi-Squared, P=0.03, n=49, and Pearson's Chi-Squared, P=0.01, n=48, respectively). The magnitude of improvement was statistically significantly higher for Group 2 compared with Group 1 (n=97, P=0.02, Pearson's Chi-Square test).CONCLUSIONS: The nature of feedback has an impact on the effectiveness of inhaler technique education with regard to correct inhaler technique maintenance over time.

U2 - 10.1038/npjpcrm.2014.71

DO - 10.1038/npjpcrm.2014.71

M3 - Article

VL - 24

JO - npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine

JF - npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine

SN - 2055-1010

M1 - 14071

ER -