External Validity of Contingent Valuation: Comparing Hypothetical and Actual Payments

Mandy Ryan (Corresponding Author), Emmanouil Mentzakis, Suthi Jareinpituk, John Cairns

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)
7 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Whilst contingent valuation is increasingly used in economics to value benefits, questions remain concerning its external validity i.e. do hypothetical responses match actual responses? We present results from the first within sample field test. Whilst Hypothetical No are always an Actual No, Hypothetical Yes exceed Actual Yes responses. A constant rate of response reversals across bids/prices could suggest theoretically consistent option value responses. Certainty calibrations (verbal and numerical response scales) minimize hypothetical-actual discrepancies offering a useful solution. Helping respondents resolve uncertainty may reduce the discrepancy between hypothetical and actual payments, and thus lead to more accurate policy recommendations.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1467-1473
Number of pages7
JournalHealth Economics
Volume26
Issue number11
Early online date9 Oct 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2017

Fingerprint

Calibration
Uncertainty
Economics
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • contingent valuation
  • external validity
  • certainty

Cite this

External Validity of Contingent Valuation : Comparing Hypothetical and Actual Payments. / Ryan, Mandy (Corresponding Author); Mentzakis, Emmanouil; Jareinpituk, Suthi; Cairns, John.

In: Health Economics, Vol. 26, No. 11, 11.2017, p. 1467-1473.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ryan, Mandy ; Mentzakis, Emmanouil ; Jareinpituk, Suthi ; Cairns, John. / External Validity of Contingent Valuation : Comparing Hypothetical and Actual Payments. In: Health Economics. 2017 ; Vol. 26, No. 11. pp. 1467-1473.
@article{8e26fa2cd371425e83376af7a2e47b87,
title = "External Validity of Contingent Valuation: Comparing Hypothetical and Actual Payments",
abstract = "Whilst contingent valuation is increasingly used in economics to value benefits, questions remain concerning its external validity i.e. do hypothetical responses match actual responses? We present results from the first within sample field test. Whilst Hypothetical No are always an Actual No, Hypothetical Yes exceed Actual Yes responses. A constant rate of response reversals across bids/prices could suggest theoretically consistent option value responses. Certainty calibrations (verbal and numerical response scales) minimize hypothetical-actual discrepancies offering a useful solution. Helping respondents resolve uncertainty may reduce the discrepancy between hypothetical and actual payments, and thus lead to more accurate policy recommendations.",
keywords = "contingent valuation, external validity, certainty",
author = "Mandy Ryan and Emmanouil Mentzakis and Suthi Jareinpituk and John Cairns",
note = "We thank respondents for taking part in the study and 2 anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments. Financial support from the University of Aberdeen and the Scottish Government Health and Social Care Directorates is acknowledged.",
year = "2017",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1002/hec.3436",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "1467--1473",
journal = "Health Economics",
issn = "1057-9230",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - External Validity of Contingent Valuation

T2 - Comparing Hypothetical and Actual Payments

AU - Ryan, Mandy

AU - Mentzakis, Emmanouil

AU - Jareinpituk, Suthi

AU - Cairns, John

N1 - We thank respondents for taking part in the study and 2 anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments. Financial support from the University of Aberdeen and the Scottish Government Health and Social Care Directorates is acknowledged.

PY - 2017/11

Y1 - 2017/11

N2 - Whilst contingent valuation is increasingly used in economics to value benefits, questions remain concerning its external validity i.e. do hypothetical responses match actual responses? We present results from the first within sample field test. Whilst Hypothetical No are always an Actual No, Hypothetical Yes exceed Actual Yes responses. A constant rate of response reversals across bids/prices could suggest theoretically consistent option value responses. Certainty calibrations (verbal and numerical response scales) minimize hypothetical-actual discrepancies offering a useful solution. Helping respondents resolve uncertainty may reduce the discrepancy between hypothetical and actual payments, and thus lead to more accurate policy recommendations.

AB - Whilst contingent valuation is increasingly used in economics to value benefits, questions remain concerning its external validity i.e. do hypothetical responses match actual responses? We present results from the first within sample field test. Whilst Hypothetical No are always an Actual No, Hypothetical Yes exceed Actual Yes responses. A constant rate of response reversals across bids/prices could suggest theoretically consistent option value responses. Certainty calibrations (verbal and numerical response scales) minimize hypothetical-actual discrepancies offering a useful solution. Helping respondents resolve uncertainty may reduce the discrepancy between hypothetical and actual payments, and thus lead to more accurate policy recommendations.

KW - contingent valuation

KW - external validity

KW - certainty

U2 - 10.1002/hec.3436

DO - 10.1002/hec.3436

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 1467

EP - 1473

JO - Health Economics

JF - Health Economics

SN - 1057-9230

IS - 11

ER -