Eye movements while judging faces for trustworthiness and dominance

Frouke Hermens (Corresponding Author), Marius Golubickis, C Neil Macrae

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Past studies examining how people judge faces for trustworthiness and dominance have suggested that they use particular facial features (e.g. mouth features for trustworthiness, eyebrow and cheek features for dominance ratings) to complete the task. Here, we examine whether eye movements during the task reflect the importance of these features. We here compared eye movements for trustworthiness and dominance ratings of face images under three stimulus configurations: Small images (mimicking large viewing distances), large images (mimicking face to face viewing), and a moving window condition (removing extrafoveal information). Whereas first area fixated, dwell times, and number of fixations depended on the size of the stimuli and the availability of extrafoveal vision, and varied substantially across participants, no clear task differences were found. These results indicate that gaze patterns for face stimuli are highly individual, do not vary between trustworthiness and dominance ratings, but are influenced by the size of the stimuli and the availability of extrafoveal vision.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere5702
JournalPeerJ
Volume6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 11 Oct 2018

Fingerprint

Eye movements
Eye Movements
eyes
Availability
ocular Dominance
Eyebrows
Cheek
Mouth
mouth

Keywords

  • eye movements
  • social judgements
  • face perception

Cite this

Eye movements while judging faces for trustworthiness and dominance. / Hermens, Frouke (Corresponding Author); Golubickis, Marius; Macrae, C Neil.

In: PeerJ, Vol. 6, e5702, 11.10.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hermens, Frouke ; Golubickis, Marius ; Macrae, C Neil. / Eye movements while judging faces for trustworthiness and dominance. In: PeerJ. 2018 ; Vol. 6.
@article{a47201bbdb364e4ebe6ba11394a5a270,
title = "Eye movements while judging faces for trustworthiness and dominance",
abstract = "Past studies examining how people judge faces for trustworthiness and dominance have suggested that they use particular facial features (e.g. mouth features for trustworthiness, eyebrow and cheek features for dominance ratings) to complete the task. Here, we examine whether eye movements during the task reflect the importance of these features. We here compared eye movements for trustworthiness and dominance ratings of face images under three stimulus configurations: Small images (mimicking large viewing distances), large images (mimicking face to face viewing), and a moving window condition (removing extrafoveal information). Whereas first area fixated, dwell times, and number of fixations depended on the size of the stimuli and the availability of extrafoveal vision, and varied substantially across participants, no clear task differences were found. These results indicate that gaze patterns for face stimuli are highly individual, do not vary between trustworthiness and dominance ratings, but are influenced by the size of the stimuli and the availability of extrafoveal vision.",
keywords = "eye movements, social judgements, face perception",
author = "Frouke Hermens and Marius Golubickis and Macrae, {C Neil}",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "11",
doi = "10.7717/peerj.5702",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
journal = "PeerJ",
issn = "2167-8359",
publisher = "PEERJ INC",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Eye movements while judging faces for trustworthiness and dominance

AU - Hermens, Frouke

AU - Golubickis, Marius

AU - Macrae, C Neil

PY - 2018/10/11

Y1 - 2018/10/11

N2 - Past studies examining how people judge faces for trustworthiness and dominance have suggested that they use particular facial features (e.g. mouth features for trustworthiness, eyebrow and cheek features for dominance ratings) to complete the task. Here, we examine whether eye movements during the task reflect the importance of these features. We here compared eye movements for trustworthiness and dominance ratings of face images under three stimulus configurations: Small images (mimicking large viewing distances), large images (mimicking face to face viewing), and a moving window condition (removing extrafoveal information). Whereas first area fixated, dwell times, and number of fixations depended on the size of the stimuli and the availability of extrafoveal vision, and varied substantially across participants, no clear task differences were found. These results indicate that gaze patterns for face stimuli are highly individual, do not vary between trustworthiness and dominance ratings, but are influenced by the size of the stimuli and the availability of extrafoveal vision.

AB - Past studies examining how people judge faces for trustworthiness and dominance have suggested that they use particular facial features (e.g. mouth features for trustworthiness, eyebrow and cheek features for dominance ratings) to complete the task. Here, we examine whether eye movements during the task reflect the importance of these features. We here compared eye movements for trustworthiness and dominance ratings of face images under three stimulus configurations: Small images (mimicking large viewing distances), large images (mimicking face to face viewing), and a moving window condition (removing extrafoveal information). Whereas first area fixated, dwell times, and number of fixations depended on the size of the stimuli and the availability of extrafoveal vision, and varied substantially across participants, no clear task differences were found. These results indicate that gaze patterns for face stimuli are highly individual, do not vary between trustworthiness and dominance ratings, but are influenced by the size of the stimuli and the availability of extrafoveal vision.

KW - eye movements

KW - social judgements

KW - face perception

U2 - 10.7717/peerj.5702

DO - 10.7717/peerj.5702

M3 - Article

C2 - 30324015

VL - 6

JO - PeerJ

JF - PeerJ

SN - 2167-8359

M1 - e5702

ER -