Eyewitness recognition errors: the effects of mugshot viewing and choosing in young and old adults

Amina Memon, Lorraine Hope, J. Bartlett, R. Bull

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    60 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Eyewitness memory is vulnerable to information encountered prior to a lineup. Young (18-30 years) and older (60-80 years) witnesses viewed a crime video. Some witnesses were then exposed to mugshots of innocent suspects that included a critical foil. After a 48-h delay, all the witnesses took part in a target-absent lineup that included the critical foil and five new foils. Witnesses who picked one of the mugshots as the likely perpetrator showed inflated rates of choosing the critical foil from the lineup. Context reinstatement instructions did not reduce choices of innocent foils following mugshot exposure. Despite age-related increases in false choosing, age did not qualify other effects. The results are discussed in terms of commitment, source memory, and gist-based processing.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1219-1227
    Number of pages8
    JournalMemory & Cognition
    Volume30
    Issue number8
    Publication statusPublished - Dec 2002

    Keywords

    • fuzzy-trace theory
    • false recognition
    • face recognition
    • age-differences
    • identification
    • memory
    • fame
    • transference
    • framework
    • accuracy

    Cite this

    Eyewitness recognition errors : the effects of mugshot viewing and choosing in young and old adults. / Memon, Amina; Hope, Lorraine; Bartlett, J.; Bull, R.

    In: Memory & Cognition, Vol. 30, No. 8, 12.2002, p. 1219-1227.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Memon, A, Hope, L, Bartlett, J & Bull, R 2002, 'Eyewitness recognition errors: the effects of mugshot viewing and choosing in young and old adults', Memory & Cognition, vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 1219-1227.
    Memon, Amina ; Hope, Lorraine ; Bartlett, J. ; Bull, R. / Eyewitness recognition errors : the effects of mugshot viewing and choosing in young and old adults. In: Memory & Cognition. 2002 ; Vol. 30, No. 8. pp. 1219-1227.
    @article{5e3aa2d692e146119be2c381170b4b80,
    title = "Eyewitness recognition errors: the effects of mugshot viewing and choosing in young and old adults",
    abstract = "Eyewitness memory is vulnerable to information encountered prior to a lineup. Young (18-30 years) and older (60-80 years) witnesses viewed a crime video. Some witnesses were then exposed to mugshots of innocent suspects that included a critical foil. After a 48-h delay, all the witnesses took part in a target-absent lineup that included the critical foil and five new foils. Witnesses who picked one of the mugshots as the likely perpetrator showed inflated rates of choosing the critical foil from the lineup. Context reinstatement instructions did not reduce choices of innocent foils following mugshot exposure. Despite age-related increases in false choosing, age did not qualify other effects. The results are discussed in terms of commitment, source memory, and gist-based processing.",
    keywords = "fuzzy-trace theory, false recognition, face recognition, age-differences, identification, memory, fame, transference, framework, accuracy",
    author = "Amina Memon and Lorraine Hope and J. Bartlett and R. Bull",
    year = "2002",
    month = "12",
    language = "English",
    volume = "30",
    pages = "1219--1227",
    journal = "Memory & Cognition",
    issn = "0090-502X",
    publisher = "Springer New York",
    number = "8",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Eyewitness recognition errors

    T2 - the effects of mugshot viewing and choosing in young and old adults

    AU - Memon, Amina

    AU - Hope, Lorraine

    AU - Bartlett, J.

    AU - Bull, R.

    PY - 2002/12

    Y1 - 2002/12

    N2 - Eyewitness memory is vulnerable to information encountered prior to a lineup. Young (18-30 years) and older (60-80 years) witnesses viewed a crime video. Some witnesses were then exposed to mugshots of innocent suspects that included a critical foil. After a 48-h delay, all the witnesses took part in a target-absent lineup that included the critical foil and five new foils. Witnesses who picked one of the mugshots as the likely perpetrator showed inflated rates of choosing the critical foil from the lineup. Context reinstatement instructions did not reduce choices of innocent foils following mugshot exposure. Despite age-related increases in false choosing, age did not qualify other effects. The results are discussed in terms of commitment, source memory, and gist-based processing.

    AB - Eyewitness memory is vulnerable to information encountered prior to a lineup. Young (18-30 years) and older (60-80 years) witnesses viewed a crime video. Some witnesses were then exposed to mugshots of innocent suspects that included a critical foil. After a 48-h delay, all the witnesses took part in a target-absent lineup that included the critical foil and five new foils. Witnesses who picked one of the mugshots as the likely perpetrator showed inflated rates of choosing the critical foil from the lineup. Context reinstatement instructions did not reduce choices of innocent foils following mugshot exposure. Despite age-related increases in false choosing, age did not qualify other effects. The results are discussed in terms of commitment, source memory, and gist-based processing.

    KW - fuzzy-trace theory

    KW - false recognition

    KW - face recognition

    KW - age-differences

    KW - identification

    KW - memory

    KW - fame

    KW - transference

    KW - framework

    KW - accuracy

    M3 - Article

    VL - 30

    SP - 1219

    EP - 1227

    JO - Memory & Cognition

    JF - Memory & Cognition

    SN - 0090-502X

    IS - 8

    ER -