Fact Check: would banning zero-hours contracts harm more people than it would help?

Jason Heyes, Keith Bender (Reviewer)

Research output: Contribution to specialist publicationArticle

Abstract

Zero-hours contracts allow employers to hire workers ad hoc without guaranteeing them a minimum number of hours a week. There were 905,000 people on zero-hours contract between October to December 2016, but they remain controversial. The Labour Party has promised to ban them, but the government remains committed to keeping the rules that allow this kind of casual employment.
Original languageEnglish
Specialist publicationThe Conversation
Publication statusPublished - 17 Jul 2017

Bibliographical note

Jason Heyes receives funding from the Economic and Social Research Council, the British Academy, the International Labour Organization and the Trades Union Congress.

Keith Bender does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Fact Check: would banning zero-hours contracts harm more people than it would help?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this