Factors influencing intensive care admission: a mixed methods study of EM and ICU

Philip Emerson, Daniel Brooks, Tara Quasim, Alex Puxty, John Kinsella, David J Lowe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: Twenty-six percent of ICU patients in the UK are referred directly from the Emergency Department (ED). There is limited literature examining the attitudes or practice of ED/ICU physicians towards referrals from the ED to the ICU. We examined these attitudes through a mixed methods study, designing a model incorporating these attitudes to promote a shared mental model between ED and ICU specialities.

Methods: Individual semistructured interviews were conducted with 11 ED consultants and 11 ICU consultants at two hospitals in the west of Scotland. Interviews were based on 10 ‘case-based vignettes’ representing patients for whom referral from the ED to the ICU is borderline or challenging. Participants were asked to note whether they would refer/accept the patient from the ED to the ICU. The proportions of participants from each speciality choosing to refer or accept patients were compared using a t-test comparing proportions. The reasons behind these decisions were explored during the semistructured interviews.

Results: Twelve factors emerged as influencing the decisions made by the participants. These belonged three core themes: patient factors, clinician factors and resource factors, which were incorporated into a shared mental model. Two cases demonstrated statistically significant differences in referral rates between specialities. There were also clinically significant differences among other cases.

Conclusion: We have described the attitudes of physicians towards ED to ICU referrals in two west of Scotland hospitals, and we have demonstrated that there is a difference in the aspects of the decision-making process. We have developed a model encompassing all factors considered by participants when assessing these difficult referrals. It is hoped that this model will promote shared and more efficient decision-making in the future.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)29-35
Number of pages7
JournalEuropean journal of emergency medicine
Volume24
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2017

Fingerprint

Critical Care
Hospital Emergency Service
Referral and Consultation
Scotland
Interviews
Consultants
Decision Making
Physicians

Keywords

  • Intensive Care
  • Qualitative Research
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Referrals

Cite this

Factors influencing intensive care admission : a mixed methods study of EM and ICU. / Emerson, Philip; Brooks, Daniel ; Quasim, Tara; Puxty, Alex; Kinsella, John ; Lowe, David J.

In: European journal of emergency medicine, Vol. 24, No. 1, 02.2017, p. 29-35.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Emerson, Philip ; Brooks, Daniel ; Quasim, Tara ; Puxty, Alex ; Kinsella, John ; Lowe, David J. / Factors influencing intensive care admission : a mixed methods study of EM and ICU. In: European journal of emergency medicine. 2017 ; Vol. 24, No. 1. pp. 29-35.
@article{34ebd97a36544efa8e7a763876dc9974,
title = "Factors influencing intensive care admission: a mixed methods study of EM and ICU",
abstract = "Objectives: Twenty-six percent of ICU patients in the UK are referred directly from the Emergency Department (ED). There is limited literature examining the attitudes or practice of ED/ICU physicians towards referrals from the ED to the ICU. We examined these attitudes through a mixed methods study, designing a model incorporating these attitudes to promote a shared mental model between ED and ICU specialities.Methods: Individual semistructured interviews were conducted with 11 ED consultants and 11 ICU consultants at two hospitals in the west of Scotland. Interviews were based on 10 ‘case-based vignettes’ representing patients for whom referral from the ED to the ICU is borderline or challenging. Participants were asked to note whether they would refer/accept the patient from the ED to the ICU. The proportions of participants from each speciality choosing to refer or accept patients were compared using a t-test comparing proportions. The reasons behind these decisions were explored during the semistructured interviews.Results: Twelve factors emerged as influencing the decisions made by the participants. These belonged three core themes: patient factors, clinician factors and resource factors, which were incorporated into a shared mental model. Two cases demonstrated statistically significant differences in referral rates between specialities. There were also clinically significant differences among other cases.Conclusion: We have described the attitudes of physicians towards ED to ICU referrals in two west of Scotland hospitals, and we have demonstrated that there is a difference in the aspects of the decision-making process. We have developed a model encompassing all factors considered by participants when assessing these difficult referrals. It is hoped that this model will promote shared and more efficient decision-making in the future.",
keywords = "Intensive Care, Qualitative Research, Emergency Medicine, Referrals",
author = "Philip Emerson and Daniel Brooks and Tara Quasim and Alex Puxty and John Kinsella and Lowe, {David J}",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000300",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "29--35",
journal = "European journal of emergency medicine",
issn = "0969-9546",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Factors influencing intensive care admission

T2 - a mixed methods study of EM and ICU

AU - Emerson, Philip

AU - Brooks, Daniel

AU - Quasim, Tara

AU - Puxty, Alex

AU - Kinsella, John

AU - Lowe, David J

PY - 2017/2

Y1 - 2017/2

N2 - Objectives: Twenty-six percent of ICU patients in the UK are referred directly from the Emergency Department (ED). There is limited literature examining the attitudes or practice of ED/ICU physicians towards referrals from the ED to the ICU. We examined these attitudes through a mixed methods study, designing a model incorporating these attitudes to promote a shared mental model between ED and ICU specialities.Methods: Individual semistructured interviews were conducted with 11 ED consultants and 11 ICU consultants at two hospitals in the west of Scotland. Interviews were based on 10 ‘case-based vignettes’ representing patients for whom referral from the ED to the ICU is borderline or challenging. Participants were asked to note whether they would refer/accept the patient from the ED to the ICU. The proportions of participants from each speciality choosing to refer or accept patients were compared using a t-test comparing proportions. The reasons behind these decisions were explored during the semistructured interviews.Results: Twelve factors emerged as influencing the decisions made by the participants. These belonged three core themes: patient factors, clinician factors and resource factors, which were incorporated into a shared mental model. Two cases demonstrated statistically significant differences in referral rates between specialities. There were also clinically significant differences among other cases.Conclusion: We have described the attitudes of physicians towards ED to ICU referrals in two west of Scotland hospitals, and we have demonstrated that there is a difference in the aspects of the decision-making process. We have developed a model encompassing all factors considered by participants when assessing these difficult referrals. It is hoped that this model will promote shared and more efficient decision-making in the future.

AB - Objectives: Twenty-six percent of ICU patients in the UK are referred directly from the Emergency Department (ED). There is limited literature examining the attitudes or practice of ED/ICU physicians towards referrals from the ED to the ICU. We examined these attitudes through a mixed methods study, designing a model incorporating these attitudes to promote a shared mental model between ED and ICU specialities.Methods: Individual semistructured interviews were conducted with 11 ED consultants and 11 ICU consultants at two hospitals in the west of Scotland. Interviews were based on 10 ‘case-based vignettes’ representing patients for whom referral from the ED to the ICU is borderline or challenging. Participants were asked to note whether they would refer/accept the patient from the ED to the ICU. The proportions of participants from each speciality choosing to refer or accept patients were compared using a t-test comparing proportions. The reasons behind these decisions were explored during the semistructured interviews.Results: Twelve factors emerged as influencing the decisions made by the participants. These belonged three core themes: patient factors, clinician factors and resource factors, which were incorporated into a shared mental model. Two cases demonstrated statistically significant differences in referral rates between specialities. There were also clinically significant differences among other cases.Conclusion: We have described the attitudes of physicians towards ED to ICU referrals in two west of Scotland hospitals, and we have demonstrated that there is a difference in the aspects of the decision-making process. We have developed a model encompassing all factors considered by participants when assessing these difficult referrals. It is hoped that this model will promote shared and more efficient decision-making in the future.

KW - Intensive Care

KW - Qualitative Research

KW - Emergency Medicine

KW - Referrals

U2 - 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000300

DO - 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000300

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 29

EP - 35

JO - European journal of emergency medicine

JF - European journal of emergency medicine

SN - 0969-9546

IS - 1

ER -