Facts and Fancies: The Geological Society of London and the Wider Public, 1807-1837

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The leading lights of the Geological Society announced the birth of a newly scientific form of Earth science by claiming to dissociate geology from the grand theories, theological controversialism and flights of fancy that they felt had dominated eighteenth-century practice. For these gentlemen, geology was to comprise strict empirical induction. They cultivated a historical myth according to which their predecessors had been hopelessly romantic theory-mongers with overactive imaginations, while they themselves were sensible, sober men of science.

But if this was so, how did geology succeed in winning such an enormous middle- and upper-class public by the late 1830s? Public support required public interest, and public interest in this period was most easily stirred by the romantic, the speculative and the poetical. Older theories of the Earth remained popular for this very reason, as did biblically literalist reconstructions of Earth history. The challenge for the new school of geology was to dissociate Earth science from the content and methodology of such theories while retaining their accompanying sense of excitement, wonder and pleasure. This paper explores how members and allies of the Geological Society negotiated (or ignored) their own suspicions about the deceptive power of the ‘imagination’ when promoting geology as a science worth the public's attention.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Making of the Geological Society of London
EditorsC. L. E. Lewis, S. J. Knell
Place of PublicationBath, UK
PublisherThe Geological Society
Pages331-340
Number of pages10
Volume317
ISBN (Print)9781862392779, 1862392773
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2009

Publication series

NameGeological Society special publication
PublisherThe Geological Society
Volume317

Fingerprint

geology
Earth science
eighteenth century
flight
public
methodology
history
science

Cite this

O'Connor, R. (2009). Facts and Fancies: The Geological Society of London and the Wider Public, 1807-1837. In C. L. E. Lewis, & S. J. Knell (Eds.), The Making of the Geological Society of London (Vol. 317, pp. 331-340). (Geological Society special publication; Vol. 317). Bath, UK: The Geological Society. https://doi.org/10.1144/SP317.19

Facts and Fancies : The Geological Society of London and the Wider Public, 1807-1837. / O'Connor, Ralph.

The Making of the Geological Society of London. ed. / C. L. E. Lewis; S. J. Knell. Vol. 317 Bath, UK : The Geological Society, 2009. p. 331-340 (Geological Society special publication; Vol. 317).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

O'Connor, R 2009, Facts and Fancies: The Geological Society of London and the Wider Public, 1807-1837. in CLE Lewis & SJ Knell (eds), The Making of the Geological Society of London. vol. 317, Geological Society special publication, vol. 317, The Geological Society, Bath, UK, pp. 331-340. https://doi.org/10.1144/SP317.19
O'Connor R. Facts and Fancies: The Geological Society of London and the Wider Public, 1807-1837. In Lewis CLE, Knell SJ, editors, The Making of the Geological Society of London. Vol. 317. Bath, UK: The Geological Society. 2009. p. 331-340. (Geological Society special publication). https://doi.org/10.1144/SP317.19
O'Connor, Ralph. / Facts and Fancies : The Geological Society of London and the Wider Public, 1807-1837. The Making of the Geological Society of London. editor / C. L. E. Lewis ; S. J. Knell. Vol. 317 Bath, UK : The Geological Society, 2009. pp. 331-340 (Geological Society special publication).
@inbook{66dfc4947a884533b697d6c757d2d3c6,
title = "Facts and Fancies: The Geological Society of London and the Wider Public, 1807-1837",
abstract = "The leading lights of the Geological Society announced the birth of a newly scientific form of Earth science by claiming to dissociate geology from the grand theories, theological controversialism and flights of fancy that they felt had dominated eighteenth-century practice. For these gentlemen, geology was to comprise strict empirical induction. They cultivated a historical myth according to which their predecessors had been hopelessly romantic theory-mongers with overactive imaginations, while they themselves were sensible, sober men of science.But if this was so, how did geology succeed in winning such an enormous middle- and upper-class public by the late 1830s? Public support required public interest, and public interest in this period was most easily stirred by the romantic, the speculative and the poetical. Older theories of the Earth remained popular for this very reason, as did biblically literalist reconstructions of Earth history. The challenge for the new school of geology was to dissociate Earth science from the content and methodology of such theories while retaining their accompanying sense of excitement, wonder and pleasure. This paper explores how members and allies of the Geological Society negotiated (or ignored) their own suspicions about the deceptive power of the ‘imagination’ when promoting geology as a science worth the public's attention.",
author = "Ralph O'Connor",
year = "2009",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1144/SP317.19",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781862392779",
volume = "317",
series = "Geological Society special publication",
publisher = "The Geological Society",
pages = "331--340",
editor = "Lewis, {C. L. E.} and Knell, {S. J.}",
booktitle = "The Making of the Geological Society of London",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Facts and Fancies

T2 - The Geological Society of London and the Wider Public, 1807-1837

AU - O'Connor, Ralph

PY - 2009/8

Y1 - 2009/8

N2 - The leading lights of the Geological Society announced the birth of a newly scientific form of Earth science by claiming to dissociate geology from the grand theories, theological controversialism and flights of fancy that they felt had dominated eighteenth-century practice. For these gentlemen, geology was to comprise strict empirical induction. They cultivated a historical myth according to which their predecessors had been hopelessly romantic theory-mongers with overactive imaginations, while they themselves were sensible, sober men of science.But if this was so, how did geology succeed in winning such an enormous middle- and upper-class public by the late 1830s? Public support required public interest, and public interest in this period was most easily stirred by the romantic, the speculative and the poetical. Older theories of the Earth remained popular for this very reason, as did biblically literalist reconstructions of Earth history. The challenge for the new school of geology was to dissociate Earth science from the content and methodology of such theories while retaining their accompanying sense of excitement, wonder and pleasure. This paper explores how members and allies of the Geological Society negotiated (or ignored) their own suspicions about the deceptive power of the ‘imagination’ when promoting geology as a science worth the public's attention.

AB - The leading lights of the Geological Society announced the birth of a newly scientific form of Earth science by claiming to dissociate geology from the grand theories, theological controversialism and flights of fancy that they felt had dominated eighteenth-century practice. For these gentlemen, geology was to comprise strict empirical induction. They cultivated a historical myth according to which their predecessors had been hopelessly romantic theory-mongers with overactive imaginations, while they themselves were sensible, sober men of science.But if this was so, how did geology succeed in winning such an enormous middle- and upper-class public by the late 1830s? Public support required public interest, and public interest in this period was most easily stirred by the romantic, the speculative and the poetical. Older theories of the Earth remained popular for this very reason, as did biblically literalist reconstructions of Earth history. The challenge for the new school of geology was to dissociate Earth science from the content and methodology of such theories while retaining their accompanying sense of excitement, wonder and pleasure. This paper explores how members and allies of the Geological Society negotiated (or ignored) their own suspicions about the deceptive power of the ‘imagination’ when promoting geology as a science worth the public's attention.

U2 - 10.1144/SP317.19

DO - 10.1144/SP317.19

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781862392779

SN - 1862392773

VL - 317

T3 - Geological Society special publication

SP - 331

EP - 340

BT - The Making of the Geological Society of London

A2 - Lewis, C. L. E.

A2 - Knell, S. J.

PB - The Geological Society

CY - Bath, UK

ER -