Abstract
Difficult tasks should be attempted one at a time, while easy tasks can be undertaken in parallel. Reinforcing our previous conclusion that people are surprisingly poor at applying this logic, we find people fail to select standing positions that maximize their probability of success in throwing a beanbag into one of two possible hoops. We asked participants to explicitly report their odds of successfully throwing a beanbag into each hoop from the location they had chosen to stand, and estimates were highly accurate. Nonetheless, participants failed to use estimates of success appropriately to maximize success, suggesting a failure of insight, rather than limited or inaccurate information, can account for suboptimal decisions about standing position.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | CogSci 2017 - Proceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society |
Subtitle of host publication | Computational Foundations of Cognition |
Publisher | The Cognitive Science Society |
Pages | 2279-2283 |
Number of pages | 5 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9780991196760 |
Publication status | Published - 2017 |
Event | 39th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society: Computational Foundations of Cognition, CogSci 2017 - London, United Kingdom Duration: 26 Jul 2017 → 29 Jul 2017 |
Conference
Conference | 39th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society: Computational Foundations of Cognition, CogSci 2017 |
---|---|
Country/Territory | United Kingdom |
City | London |
Period | 26/07/17 → 29/07/17 |
Keywords
- Awareness
- Bounded Rationality
- Decision Making
- Optimal Behaviour