Familiarity breeds dissent

Reliability analyses for British-English idioms on measures of familiarity, meaning, literality, and decomposability

Emily Nordmann, Alexandra Alice Cleland, Rebecca Bull

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)
7 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

To date, there have been several attempts made to build a database of normative data for English idiomatic expressions (e.g., Libben & Titone, 2008; Titone & Connine, 1994), however, there has been some discussion in the literature as to the validity and reliability of the data obtained, particularly for decomposability ratings. Our work aimed to address these issues by looking at ratings from native and non-native speakers and to extend the deeper investigation and analysis of decomposability to other aspects of idiomatic expressions, namely familiarly, meaning and literality. Poor reliability was observed on all types of ratings, suggesting that rather than decomposability being a special case, individual variability plays a large role in how participants rate idiomatic phrases in general. Ratings from native and non-native speakers were positively correlated and an analysis of covariance found that once familiarity with an idiom was accounted for, most of the differences between native and non-native ratings were not significant. Overall, the results suggest that individual experience with idioms plays an important role in how they are perceived and this should be taken into account when selecting stimuli for experimental studies. Furthermore, the results are suggestive of the inability of speakers to inhibit the figurative meanings for idioms that they are highly familiar with.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)87-95
Number of pages9
JournalActa Psychologica
Volume149
Early online date15 Apr 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2014

Fingerprint

Dissent and Disputes
Reproducibility of Results
Databases
Recognition (Psychology)
English Idioms
British English
Dissent
Literality
Rating
Familiarity
Idioms

Keywords

  • idioms
  • familiarity
  • reliability

Cite this

@article{b6f9f94b8c3044b0938361374bd51400,
title = "Familiarity breeds dissent: Reliability analyses for British-English idioms on measures of familiarity, meaning, literality, and decomposability",
abstract = "To date, there have been several attempts made to build a database of normative data for English idiomatic expressions (e.g., Libben & Titone, 2008; Titone & Connine, 1994), however, there has been some discussion in the literature as to the validity and reliability of the data obtained, particularly for decomposability ratings. Our work aimed to address these issues by looking at ratings from native and non-native speakers and to extend the deeper investigation and analysis of decomposability to other aspects of idiomatic expressions, namely familiarly, meaning and literality. Poor reliability was observed on all types of ratings, suggesting that rather than decomposability being a special case, individual variability plays a large role in how participants rate idiomatic phrases in general. Ratings from native and non-native speakers were positively correlated and an analysis of covariance found that once familiarity with an idiom was accounted for, most of the differences between native and non-native ratings were not significant. Overall, the results suggest that individual experience with idioms plays an important role in how they are perceived and this should be taken into account when selecting stimuli for experimental studies. Furthermore, the results are suggestive of the inability of speakers to inhibit the figurative meanings for idioms that they are highly familiar with.",
keywords = "idioms, familiarity, reliability",
author = "Emily Nordmann and Cleland, {Alexandra Alice} and Rebecca Bull",
year = "2014",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.03.009",
language = "English",
volume = "149",
pages = "87--95",
journal = "Acta Psychologica",
issn = "0001-6918",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Familiarity breeds dissent

T2 - Reliability analyses for British-English idioms on measures of familiarity, meaning, literality, and decomposability

AU - Nordmann, Emily

AU - Cleland, Alexandra Alice

AU - Bull, Rebecca

PY - 2014/6

Y1 - 2014/6

N2 - To date, there have been several attempts made to build a database of normative data for English idiomatic expressions (e.g., Libben & Titone, 2008; Titone & Connine, 1994), however, there has been some discussion in the literature as to the validity and reliability of the data obtained, particularly for decomposability ratings. Our work aimed to address these issues by looking at ratings from native and non-native speakers and to extend the deeper investigation and analysis of decomposability to other aspects of idiomatic expressions, namely familiarly, meaning and literality. Poor reliability was observed on all types of ratings, suggesting that rather than decomposability being a special case, individual variability plays a large role in how participants rate idiomatic phrases in general. Ratings from native and non-native speakers were positively correlated and an analysis of covariance found that once familiarity with an idiom was accounted for, most of the differences between native and non-native ratings were not significant. Overall, the results suggest that individual experience with idioms plays an important role in how they are perceived and this should be taken into account when selecting stimuli for experimental studies. Furthermore, the results are suggestive of the inability of speakers to inhibit the figurative meanings for idioms that they are highly familiar with.

AB - To date, there have been several attempts made to build a database of normative data for English idiomatic expressions (e.g., Libben & Titone, 2008; Titone & Connine, 1994), however, there has been some discussion in the literature as to the validity and reliability of the data obtained, particularly for decomposability ratings. Our work aimed to address these issues by looking at ratings from native and non-native speakers and to extend the deeper investigation and analysis of decomposability to other aspects of idiomatic expressions, namely familiarly, meaning and literality. Poor reliability was observed on all types of ratings, suggesting that rather than decomposability being a special case, individual variability plays a large role in how participants rate idiomatic phrases in general. Ratings from native and non-native speakers were positively correlated and an analysis of covariance found that once familiarity with an idiom was accounted for, most of the differences between native and non-native ratings were not significant. Overall, the results suggest that individual experience with idioms plays an important role in how they are perceived and this should be taken into account when selecting stimuli for experimental studies. Furthermore, the results are suggestive of the inability of speakers to inhibit the figurative meanings for idioms that they are highly familiar with.

KW - idioms

KW - familiarity

KW - reliability

U2 - 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.03.009

DO - 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.03.009

M3 - Article

VL - 149

SP - 87

EP - 95

JO - Acta Psychologica

JF - Acta Psychologica

SN - 0001-6918

ER -