Farm diversification, tenancy and CAP reform

Results from a survey of tenant farmers in England

Damian Maye, Brian Ilbery, David Watts

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

77 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Little work has considered explicitly the role of farm tenancy in influencing the uptake (or not) of diversification activities. The need to examine this link has been heightened because of the 2003 CAP reforms and the decision to tie Single Farm Payment (SFP) entitlement to the land rather than what is produced on that land. The main objective of this paper, therefore, is to examine the nature of diversification activities on tenant farms in England, which includes a consideration of how the introduction of the SFP and other CAP reforms may influence such restructuring processes. Results from a national postal survey, supported by tenant farmer/landlord interviews and a workshop, reveal high rates of farm diversification on farms with tenanted land. However, if one takes away contract/hire services the rate of diversification on tenant farms is much less. Tenant farms appear to favour more ‘traditional’ diversification activities and the results also demonstrate an increasing need to move towards more ‘encultured’ definitions of farm diversification. The second key finding to emerge from the research relates to the high levels of uncertainty and negativity surrounding the potential impacts of the CAP reforms, and SFP in particular, on farm business behaviour. Tenant farmers were more concerned about levels of SFP and entitlement than future investment decisions, including diversification.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)333-342
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Rural Studies
Volume25
Issue number3
Early online date1 May 2009
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2009

Fingerprint

CAP
diversification
farm
farmer
reform
landlord
restructuring

Keywords

  • diversification
  • farm tenancy
  • common agricultural policy reform
  • single farm payments
  • England

Cite this

Farm diversification, tenancy and CAP reform : Results from a survey of tenant farmers in England. / Maye, Damian ; Ilbery, Brian; Watts, David.

In: Journal of Rural Studies, Vol. 25, No. 3, 07.2009, p. 333-342.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{03d2940f4f2b4fa9b21c60848c149785,
title = "Farm diversification, tenancy and CAP reform: Results from a survey of tenant farmers in England",
abstract = "Little work has considered explicitly the role of farm tenancy in influencing the uptake (or not) of diversification activities. The need to examine this link has been heightened because of the 2003 CAP reforms and the decision to tie Single Farm Payment (SFP) entitlement to the land rather than what is produced on that land. The main objective of this paper, therefore, is to examine the nature of diversification activities on tenant farms in England, which includes a consideration of how the introduction of the SFP and other CAP reforms may influence such restructuring processes. Results from a national postal survey, supported by tenant farmer/landlord interviews and a workshop, reveal high rates of farm diversification on farms with tenanted land. However, if one takes away contract/hire services the rate of diversification on tenant farms is much less. Tenant farms appear to favour more ‘traditional’ diversification activities and the results also demonstrate an increasing need to move towards more ‘encultured’ definitions of farm diversification. The second key finding to emerge from the research relates to the high levels of uncertainty and negativity surrounding the potential impacts of the CAP reforms, and SFP in particular, on farm business behaviour. Tenant farmers were more concerned about levels of SFP and entitlement than future investment decisions, including diversification.",
keywords = "diversification, farm tenancy, common agricultural policy reform, single farm payments, England",
author = "Damian Maye and Brian Ilbery and David Watts",
year = "2009",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.jrurstud.2009.03.003",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "333--342",
journal = "Journal of Rural Studies",
issn = "0743-0167",
publisher = "PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Farm diversification, tenancy and CAP reform

T2 - Results from a survey of tenant farmers in England

AU - Maye, Damian

AU - Ilbery, Brian

AU - Watts, David

PY - 2009/7

Y1 - 2009/7

N2 - Little work has considered explicitly the role of farm tenancy in influencing the uptake (or not) of diversification activities. The need to examine this link has been heightened because of the 2003 CAP reforms and the decision to tie Single Farm Payment (SFP) entitlement to the land rather than what is produced on that land. The main objective of this paper, therefore, is to examine the nature of diversification activities on tenant farms in England, which includes a consideration of how the introduction of the SFP and other CAP reforms may influence such restructuring processes. Results from a national postal survey, supported by tenant farmer/landlord interviews and a workshop, reveal high rates of farm diversification on farms with tenanted land. However, if one takes away contract/hire services the rate of diversification on tenant farms is much less. Tenant farms appear to favour more ‘traditional’ diversification activities and the results also demonstrate an increasing need to move towards more ‘encultured’ definitions of farm diversification. The second key finding to emerge from the research relates to the high levels of uncertainty and negativity surrounding the potential impacts of the CAP reforms, and SFP in particular, on farm business behaviour. Tenant farmers were more concerned about levels of SFP and entitlement than future investment decisions, including diversification.

AB - Little work has considered explicitly the role of farm tenancy in influencing the uptake (or not) of diversification activities. The need to examine this link has been heightened because of the 2003 CAP reforms and the decision to tie Single Farm Payment (SFP) entitlement to the land rather than what is produced on that land. The main objective of this paper, therefore, is to examine the nature of diversification activities on tenant farms in England, which includes a consideration of how the introduction of the SFP and other CAP reforms may influence such restructuring processes. Results from a national postal survey, supported by tenant farmer/landlord interviews and a workshop, reveal high rates of farm diversification on farms with tenanted land. However, if one takes away contract/hire services the rate of diversification on tenant farms is much less. Tenant farms appear to favour more ‘traditional’ diversification activities and the results also demonstrate an increasing need to move towards more ‘encultured’ definitions of farm diversification. The second key finding to emerge from the research relates to the high levels of uncertainty and negativity surrounding the potential impacts of the CAP reforms, and SFP in particular, on farm business behaviour. Tenant farmers were more concerned about levels of SFP and entitlement than future investment decisions, including diversification.

KW - diversification

KW - farm tenancy

KW - common agricultural policy reform

KW - single farm payments

KW - England

U2 - 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2009.03.003

DO - 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2009.03.003

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 333

EP - 342

JO - Journal of Rural Studies

JF - Journal of Rural Studies

SN - 0743-0167

IS - 3

ER -