Fat storage influences fasting endurance more than body size in an ungulate

L. Monica Trondrud*, Gabriel Pigeon, Elżbieta Król, Steve Albon, Alina L. Evans, Walter Arnold, Catherine Hambly, R. Justin Irvine, Erik Ropstad, Audun Stien, Vebjørn Veiberg, John R. Speakman*, Leif Egil Loe

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The fasting endurance hypothesis (FEH) predicts strong selection for large body size in mammals living in environments where food supply is interrupted over prolonged periods of time. The Arctic is a highly seasonal and food‐restricted environment, but contrary to predictions from the FEH, empirical evidence shows that Arctic mammals are often smaller than their temperate conspecifics. Intraspecific studies integrating physiology and behaviour of different‐sized individuals may shed light on this paradox. We tested the FEH in free‐living Svalbard reindeer Rangifer tarandus platyrhynchus. We measured daily energy expenditure (DEE), subcutaneous body temperature (Tsc) and activity levels during the late winter in 14 adult females with body masses ranging from 46.3 to 57.8 kg. Winter energy expenditure (WEE) and fasting endurance (FE) were modelled dynamically by combining these data with body composition measurements of culled individuals at the onset of winter (14 years, n = 140) and variation in activity level throughout winter (10 years, n = 70). Mean DEE was 6.3 ± 0.7 MJ/day. Lean mass, Tsc and activity had significantly positive effects on DEE. Across all 140 individuals, mean FE was 85 ± 17 days (range 48–137 days). In contrast to the predictions of the FEH, the dominant factor affecting FE was initial fat mass, while body mass and FE were not correlated. Furthermore, lean mass and fat mass were not correlated. FE was on average 80% (45 days) longer in fat than lean individuals of the same size. Reducing activity levels by ~16% or Tsc by ~5% increased FE by 7% and 4% respectively. Our results fail to support the FEH. Rather, we demonstrate that (a) the size of fat reserves can be independent of lean mass and body size within a species, (b) ecological and environmental variation influence FE via their effects on body composition and (c) physiological and behavioural adjustments can improve FE within individuals. Altogether, our results suggest that there is a selection in Svalbard reindeer to accumulate body fat, rather than to grow structurally large. A free Plain Language Summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to) 1470-1480
Number of pages11
JournalFunctional Ecology
Volume35
Issue number7
Early online date14 May 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2021

Bibliographical note

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors thank two anonymous reviewers for constructive and insightful feedback which substantially improved their manuscript. They thank the Governor of Svalbard for permission to carry out the research. they are especially grateful to Mads Forchhammer, and the logistical and technical staff at the University Centre in Svalbard for supporting the field campaigns. They thank Marina Stamatiou and Peter Thompson for technical assistance in conducting the isotope analyses. The work was supported by the Norwegian Research Council (KLIMAFORSK project number 267613) and NMBU through the PhD grant of L.M.T. Equipment used for the detailed monitoring of animal movement and activity was supported by a grant to COAT from Tromsø Research Foundation. The animal handling protocol was approved by the Norwegian Food Safety Authority (permit no. 17/237024) and the Governor of Svalbard (permit no.16/01632‐9). The authors have no conflict of interest.

Keywords

  • activity
  • biologging
  • daily energy expenditure
  • doubly labelled water
  • intraspecific scaling
  • subcutaneous body temperature
  • Svalbard reindeer
  • the Arctic

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Fat storage influences fasting endurance more than body size in an ungulate'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this