Female Reproductive Disorders, Diseases, and Costs of Exposure to Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals in the European Union

Patricia A. Hunt, Sheela Sathyanarayana, Paul A. Fowler, Leonardo Trasande

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)
3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Context:
A growing body of evidence suggests that endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) contribute to female reproductive disorders.

Objective:
To calculate the associated combined health care and economic costs attributable to specific EDC exposures within the European Union (EU).

Design:
An expert panel evaluated evidence for probability of causation using the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change weight-of-evidence characterization. Exposure-response relationships and reference levels were evaluated, and biomarker data were organized from carefully identified studies from the peer-reviewed literature to represent European exposure and approximate burden of disease as it occurred in 2010. Cost-of-illness estimation used multiple peer-reviewed sources.

Setting, Patients and Participants and Intervention:
Cost estimation was carried out from a societal perspective, ie, including direct costs (eg, treatment costs) and indirect costs such as productivity loss.

Results:
The most robust EDC-related data for female reproductive disorders exist for 1) diphenyldichloroethene-attributable fibroids and 2) phthalate-attributable endometriosis in Europe. In both cases, the strength of epidemiological evidence was rated as low and the toxicological evidence as moderate, with an assigned probability of causation of 20%–39%. Across the EU, attributable cases were estimated to be 56 700 and 145 000 women, respectively, with total combined economic and health care costs potentially reaching €163 million and €1.25 billion.

Conclusions:
EDCs (diphenyldichloroethene and phthalates) may contribute substantially to the most common reproductive disorders in women, endometriosis and fibroids, costing nearly €1.5 billion annually. These estimates represent only EDCs for which there were sufficient epidemiologic studies and those with the highest probability of causation. These public health costs should be considered as the EU contemplates regulatory action on EDCs.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1562–1570
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism
Volume101
Issue number4
Early online date22 Mar 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2016

    Fingerprint

Cite this