Feminist Fatigue(s): reflections on feminism and familiar fables of militarization

Marysia Zalewski, Maria Stern

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this article we critically consider the idea that feminism has performatively failed within the discipline of International Relations. One aspect of this failure relates to the production of sexgender through feminism which we suggest is partly responsible for a weariness inflecting feminist scholarship, in particular as a critical theoretical resource. We reflect on this weariness in the context of the study and practice of international politics – arenas still reaping the potent benefits of the virile political energies reverberating since 9/11. To illustrate our arguments we re-count a familiar feminist fable of militarisation – a story which we use to exemplify how the production of feminist IR is ‘set’ up to ‘fail’. In so doing we clarify our depiction of feminism as seemingly haunted by its inherent paradoxes as well as explaining why it matters to discuss feminism within the locale of the academic study of international politics. We conclude with a consideration of the grammar of temporality that delimits representations of feminism and move to recast feminist failure as aporetic and concomitantly implicated in the process of intervening politically.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)611-630
Number of pages20
JournalReview of International Studies
Volume35
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2009

Cite this

Feminist Fatigue(s) : reflections on feminism and familiar fables of militarization. / Zalewski, Marysia; Stern, Maria.

In: Review of International Studies, Vol. 35, No. 3, 07.2009, p. 611-630.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Zalewski, Marysia ; Stern, Maria. / Feminist Fatigue(s) : reflections on feminism and familiar fables of militarization. In: Review of International Studies. 2009 ; Vol. 35, No. 3. pp. 611-630.
@article{725d009172b6420da652f0464d0018d6,
title = "Feminist Fatigue(s): reflections on feminism and familiar fables of militarization",
abstract = "In this article we critically consider the idea that feminism has performatively failed within the discipline of International Relations. One aspect of this failure relates to the production of sexgender through feminism which we suggest is partly responsible for a weariness inflecting feminist scholarship, in particular as a critical theoretical resource. We reflect on this weariness in the context of the study and practice of international politics – arenas still reaping the potent benefits of the virile political energies reverberating since 9/11. To illustrate our arguments we re-count a familiar feminist fable of militarisation – a story which we use to exemplify how the production of feminist IR is ‘set’ up to ‘fail’. In so doing we clarify our depiction of feminism as seemingly haunted by its inherent paradoxes as well as explaining why it matters to discuss feminism within the locale of the academic study of international politics. We conclude with a consideration of the grammar of temporality that delimits representations of feminism and move to recast feminist failure as aporetic and concomitantly implicated in the process of intervening politically.",
author = "Marysia Zalewski and Maria Stern",
year = "2009",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1017/S0260210509008675",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "611--630",
journal = "Review of International Studies",
issn = "0260-2105",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Feminist Fatigue(s)

T2 - reflections on feminism and familiar fables of militarization

AU - Zalewski, Marysia

AU - Stern, Maria

PY - 2009/7

Y1 - 2009/7

N2 - In this article we critically consider the idea that feminism has performatively failed within the discipline of International Relations. One aspect of this failure relates to the production of sexgender through feminism which we suggest is partly responsible for a weariness inflecting feminist scholarship, in particular as a critical theoretical resource. We reflect on this weariness in the context of the study and practice of international politics – arenas still reaping the potent benefits of the virile political energies reverberating since 9/11. To illustrate our arguments we re-count a familiar feminist fable of militarisation – a story which we use to exemplify how the production of feminist IR is ‘set’ up to ‘fail’. In so doing we clarify our depiction of feminism as seemingly haunted by its inherent paradoxes as well as explaining why it matters to discuss feminism within the locale of the academic study of international politics. We conclude with a consideration of the grammar of temporality that delimits representations of feminism and move to recast feminist failure as aporetic and concomitantly implicated in the process of intervening politically.

AB - In this article we critically consider the idea that feminism has performatively failed within the discipline of International Relations. One aspect of this failure relates to the production of sexgender through feminism which we suggest is partly responsible for a weariness inflecting feminist scholarship, in particular as a critical theoretical resource. We reflect on this weariness in the context of the study and practice of international politics – arenas still reaping the potent benefits of the virile political energies reverberating since 9/11. To illustrate our arguments we re-count a familiar feminist fable of militarisation – a story which we use to exemplify how the production of feminist IR is ‘set’ up to ‘fail’. In so doing we clarify our depiction of feminism as seemingly haunted by its inherent paradoxes as well as explaining why it matters to discuss feminism within the locale of the academic study of international politics. We conclude with a consideration of the grammar of temporality that delimits representations of feminism and move to recast feminist failure as aporetic and concomitantly implicated in the process of intervening politically.

U2 - 10.1017/S0260210509008675

DO - 10.1017/S0260210509008675

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 611

EP - 630

JO - Review of International Studies

JF - Review of International Studies

SN - 0260-2105

IS - 3

ER -