Fierce and Accommodationist Divided Cities: Understanding Right-to-the-City Protests in Beirut and Manama

John Nagle* (Corresponding Author), Simon Mabon

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Divided cities have attracted mounting scholarly attention. Yet, while the focus has largely been on how divisions are constructed, we examine the potentiality of waves of non-sectarian protest movements as urban peacebuilding actors. Towards this, we draw on comparative research on protests in two divided cities in the MENA region, Beirut (Lebanon) and Manama (Bahrain). These two cities, we argue, represent contrasting forms of divided city, marked by different approaches to dealing with sectarian pluralism that ultimately entrench sectarianism and inequality. Protest movements thus represent right-to-the-city mobilisations oriented towards demands for inclusive urban living. These movements foster ‘insurgent citizenship, an articulation of urban belonging and citizenship that focusses on confronting and destabilising the entrenched regimes of citizen inequality. However, while these protests are important peacebuilding actors, we note the profound structural and agential forces that limit the movement’s goals.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)381-402
Number of pages22
JournalPeacebuilding
Volume11
Issue number4
Early online date4 Jul 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Open Access under the Taylor & Francis Agreement
Part of this research has been funded by Carnegie Corporation of New York, whose ongoing support for SEPAD is invaluable.

Keywords

  • Right-to-the-city
  • Beirut
  • Manama
  • Peacebuilding
  • Protest

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Fierce and Accommodationist Divided Cities: Understanding Right-to-the-City Protests in Beirut and Manama'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this