Findings from the Garner-paradigm do not support the "how" versus "what" distinction in the visual brain

Constanze Hesse, T. Schenk

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this study we challenge the widely accepted suggestion that visual perception, but not visual control of action, processes object shape in a holistic manner (Ganel and Goodale, 2003, Nature). The finding that perceptual judgments but not visuomotor acts, such as grasping are affected by variations along an irrelevant object dimension (Garner-interference) is held up as strong evidence that vision for perception and vision for action are processed within different areas of the human brain. Here, we suggest that it is possible to explain the observed dissociation without recourse to functional and/or neurological dissociations between vision for perception and vision for action. In three experiments, we demonstrate that it is possible to either elicit or eliminate a Garner-interference effect in a perceptual task by varying the temporal profile of the perceptual response. Additionally, we show that it is also possible to induce a Garner-interference effect in a visuomotor task when the task is designed in a way which discourages participants from making online changes to their ongoing motor response. We suggest that the crucial factor for the occurrence of a Garner-interference is whether reaction time is measured such that it actually reflects the total duration of the response selection processes or not. According to our results, it seems therefore no longer appropriate to use the Garner-paradigm in support of the notion that the processing mechanisms in perception and action are dissociated.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)164-171
Number of pages8
JournalBehavioural Brain Research
Volume239
Early online date19 Nov 2012
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Feb 2013

Fingerprint

Brain
Visual Perception
Reaction Time

Keywords

  • perception-action model
  • dorsal stream
  • ventral stream
  • Garner-interference
  • grasping

Cite this

Findings from the Garner-paradigm do not support the "how" versus "what" distinction in the visual brain. / Hesse, Constanze; Schenk, T.

In: Behavioural Brain Research, Vol. 239, 15.02.2013, p. 164-171.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{43d9e562d0134efcb3385accbc82307e,
title = "Findings from the Garner-paradigm do not support the {"}how{"} versus {"}what{"} distinction in the visual brain",
abstract = "In this study we challenge the widely accepted suggestion that visual perception, but not visual control of action, processes object shape in a holistic manner (Ganel and Goodale, 2003, Nature). The finding that perceptual judgments but not visuomotor acts, such as grasping are affected by variations along an irrelevant object dimension (Garner-interference) is held up as strong evidence that vision for perception and vision for action are processed within different areas of the human brain. Here, we suggest that it is possible to explain the observed dissociation without recourse to functional and/or neurological dissociations between vision for perception and vision for action. In three experiments, we demonstrate that it is possible to either elicit or eliminate a Garner-interference effect in a perceptual task by varying the temporal profile of the perceptual response. Additionally, we show that it is also possible to induce a Garner-interference effect in a visuomotor task when the task is designed in a way which discourages participants from making online changes to their ongoing motor response. We suggest that the crucial factor for the occurrence of a Garner-interference is whether reaction time is measured such that it actually reflects the total duration of the response selection processes or not. According to our results, it seems therefore no longer appropriate to use the Garner-paradigm in support of the notion that the processing mechanisms in perception and action are dissociated.",
keywords = "perception-action model, dorsal stream, ventral stream, Garner-interference, grasping",
author = "Constanze Hesse and T. Schenk",
year = "2013",
month = "2",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.bbr.2012.11.007",
language = "English",
volume = "239",
pages = "164--171",
journal = "Behavioural Brain Research",
issn = "0166-4328",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Findings from the Garner-paradigm do not support the "how" versus "what" distinction in the visual brain

AU - Hesse, Constanze

AU - Schenk, T.

PY - 2013/2/15

Y1 - 2013/2/15

N2 - In this study we challenge the widely accepted suggestion that visual perception, but not visual control of action, processes object shape in a holistic manner (Ganel and Goodale, 2003, Nature). The finding that perceptual judgments but not visuomotor acts, such as grasping are affected by variations along an irrelevant object dimension (Garner-interference) is held up as strong evidence that vision for perception and vision for action are processed within different areas of the human brain. Here, we suggest that it is possible to explain the observed dissociation without recourse to functional and/or neurological dissociations between vision for perception and vision for action. In three experiments, we demonstrate that it is possible to either elicit or eliminate a Garner-interference effect in a perceptual task by varying the temporal profile of the perceptual response. Additionally, we show that it is also possible to induce a Garner-interference effect in a visuomotor task when the task is designed in a way which discourages participants from making online changes to their ongoing motor response. We suggest that the crucial factor for the occurrence of a Garner-interference is whether reaction time is measured such that it actually reflects the total duration of the response selection processes or not. According to our results, it seems therefore no longer appropriate to use the Garner-paradigm in support of the notion that the processing mechanisms in perception and action are dissociated.

AB - In this study we challenge the widely accepted suggestion that visual perception, but not visual control of action, processes object shape in a holistic manner (Ganel and Goodale, 2003, Nature). The finding that perceptual judgments but not visuomotor acts, such as grasping are affected by variations along an irrelevant object dimension (Garner-interference) is held up as strong evidence that vision for perception and vision for action are processed within different areas of the human brain. Here, we suggest that it is possible to explain the observed dissociation without recourse to functional and/or neurological dissociations between vision for perception and vision for action. In three experiments, we demonstrate that it is possible to either elicit or eliminate a Garner-interference effect in a perceptual task by varying the temporal profile of the perceptual response. Additionally, we show that it is also possible to induce a Garner-interference effect in a visuomotor task when the task is designed in a way which discourages participants from making online changes to their ongoing motor response. We suggest that the crucial factor for the occurrence of a Garner-interference is whether reaction time is measured such that it actually reflects the total duration of the response selection processes or not. According to our results, it seems therefore no longer appropriate to use the Garner-paradigm in support of the notion that the processing mechanisms in perception and action are dissociated.

KW - perception-action model

KW - dorsal stream

KW - ventral stream

KW - Garner-interference

KW - grasping

U2 - 10.1016/j.bbr.2012.11.007

DO - 10.1016/j.bbr.2012.11.007

M3 - Article

VL - 239

SP - 164

EP - 171

JO - Behavioural Brain Research

JF - Behavioural Brain Research

SN - 0166-4328

ER -