For whom do local peace processes function?

Maintaining control through conflict management

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)
5 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Recent peacebuilding literature provides a sustained critique of externally designed conflict management processes and promotes instead local mechanisms. Such mechanisms, it is argued, will provide more ownership and agency to local actors and, thus, a more sustainable peace. But while there are many examples of local conflict management institutions, and many discussions of the hybrid outcomes of interaction between the global and local, the literature rarely explores exactly what transpires on the ground when international actors influence the operation of local peace processes. This paper provides exactly this insight. The data presented illustrates how local conflict management institutions in rural Sierra Leone are subtly manipulated by actors – both international and local – to maintain and enhance existing relations of power. The paper illustrates, therefore, the problems that arise when local conflict management institutions become interlaced with new forms of power and start themselves to serve as sites of contestation and resistance.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)293-308
Number of pages16
JournalCooperation and Conflict
Volume52
Issue number3
Early online date5 Oct 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2017

Fingerprint

peace process
conflict management
Sierra Leone
peace
interaction
literature

Keywords

  • peacebuilding
  • Sierra Leone
  • land-grab
  • customary authority
  • local-turn
  • bottom-up

Cite this

For whom do local peace processes function? Maintaining control through conflict management. / Millar, Gearoid.

In: Cooperation and Conflict, Vol. 52, No. 3, 01.09.2017, p. 293-308.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f60137d35c7240c8a6532d0f8012a1a3,
title = "For whom do local peace processes function?: Maintaining control through conflict management",
abstract = "Recent peacebuilding literature provides a sustained critique of externally designed conflict management processes and promotes instead local mechanisms. Such mechanisms, it is argued, will provide more ownership and agency to local actors and, thus, a more sustainable peace. But while there are many examples of local conflict management institutions, and many discussions of the hybrid outcomes of interaction between the global and local, the literature rarely explores exactly what transpires on the ground when international actors influence the operation of local peace processes. This paper provides exactly this insight. The data presented illustrates how local conflict management institutions in rural Sierra Leone are subtly manipulated by actors – both international and local – to maintain and enhance existing relations of power. The paper illustrates, therefore, the problems that arise when local conflict management institutions become interlaced with new forms of power and start themselves to serve as sites of contestation and resistance.",
keywords = "peacebuilding, Sierra Leone, land-grab, customary authority, local-turn, bottom-up",
author = "Gearoid Millar",
note = "Funding This work was supported by a Faculty Fieldwork Grant from the Faculty of Management at Radboud University Nijmegen (2012), and a Research Grant from the Carnegie Trust for the Universities of Scotland (2013).",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0010836716671757",
language = "English",
volume = "52",
pages = "293--308",
journal = "Cooperation and Conflict",
issn = "0010-8367",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - For whom do local peace processes function?

T2 - Maintaining control through conflict management

AU - Millar, Gearoid

N1 - Funding This work was supported by a Faculty Fieldwork Grant from the Faculty of Management at Radboud University Nijmegen (2012), and a Research Grant from the Carnegie Trust for the Universities of Scotland (2013).

PY - 2017/9/1

Y1 - 2017/9/1

N2 - Recent peacebuilding literature provides a sustained critique of externally designed conflict management processes and promotes instead local mechanisms. Such mechanisms, it is argued, will provide more ownership and agency to local actors and, thus, a more sustainable peace. But while there are many examples of local conflict management institutions, and many discussions of the hybrid outcomes of interaction between the global and local, the literature rarely explores exactly what transpires on the ground when international actors influence the operation of local peace processes. This paper provides exactly this insight. The data presented illustrates how local conflict management institutions in rural Sierra Leone are subtly manipulated by actors – both international and local – to maintain and enhance existing relations of power. The paper illustrates, therefore, the problems that arise when local conflict management institutions become interlaced with new forms of power and start themselves to serve as sites of contestation and resistance.

AB - Recent peacebuilding literature provides a sustained critique of externally designed conflict management processes and promotes instead local mechanisms. Such mechanisms, it is argued, will provide more ownership and agency to local actors and, thus, a more sustainable peace. But while there are many examples of local conflict management institutions, and many discussions of the hybrid outcomes of interaction between the global and local, the literature rarely explores exactly what transpires on the ground when international actors influence the operation of local peace processes. This paper provides exactly this insight. The data presented illustrates how local conflict management institutions in rural Sierra Leone are subtly manipulated by actors – both international and local – to maintain and enhance existing relations of power. The paper illustrates, therefore, the problems that arise when local conflict management institutions become interlaced with new forms of power and start themselves to serve as sites of contestation and resistance.

KW - peacebuilding

KW - Sierra Leone

KW - land-grab

KW - customary authority

KW - local-turn

KW - bottom-up

U2 - 10.1177/0010836716671757

DO - 10.1177/0010836716671757

M3 - Article

VL - 52

SP - 293

EP - 308

JO - Cooperation and Conflict

JF - Cooperation and Conflict

SN - 0010-8367

IS - 3

ER -