Form discrimination in a case of blindsight

Ceri T Trevethan, Arash Sahraie, Larry Weiskrantz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

DB, the first extensively tested blindsight case, has demonstrated the ability to detect and discriminate a range of visual stimuli presented within his perimetrically blind visual field [Weiskrantz L. (1986). Blindsight: A case study and implications. Oxford: Oxford University Press]. After initial reports of basic form discrimination (Weiskrantz, 1986), it later emerged that this ability to discriminate single stimuli presented to the blind field was probably based on the discrimination of orientation cues [Weiskrantz, L. (1987). Residual vision in a scotoma. A follow-up study of 'form' discrimination. Brain, 110, 77-92]. Even so, DB found it impossible to make a 'same/different' discrimination for pairs of stimuli in the blind field (Weiskrantz, 1986). In the current study, DB's discrimination and identification of stimuli on the basis of their form was tested (in 2AFC and FR paradigms). We have demonstrated that DB could successfully identify outline low contrast images of objects, make successful 'same/different' discriminations for pairs of stimuli presented in his blind field and identify complex images (digital photographs) presented entirely within his cortically blind field. The results are discussed in relation to the issues of likely neuronal mediation, the potential for improvement in cases of blindsight and the potential relevance of these findings in relation to theories of normal visual perception. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2092-2103
Number of pages12
JournalNeuropsychologia
Volume45
Issue number9
Early online date6 Feb 2007
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 May 2007

Keywords

  • cortical blindness
  • shape perception
  • complex images
  • low contrast images
  • spatiotemporal contrast sensitivity
  • residual vision
  • spatial channels
  • hemianopic field
  • striate cortex
  • visual-cortex
  • perception
  • subject
  • pattern
  • monkey

Cite this

Form discrimination in a case of blindsight. / Trevethan, Ceri T; Sahraie, Arash; Weiskrantz, Larry.

In: Neuropsychologia, Vol. 45, No. 9, 15.05.2007, p. 2092-2103.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Trevethan, Ceri T ; Sahraie, Arash ; Weiskrantz, Larry. / Form discrimination in a case of blindsight. In: Neuropsychologia. 2007 ; Vol. 45, No. 9. pp. 2092-2103.
@article{9cd63cbac45949ca88b8abf0acd2b3bf,
title = "Form discrimination in a case of blindsight",
abstract = "DB, the first extensively tested blindsight case, has demonstrated the ability to detect and discriminate a range of visual stimuli presented within his perimetrically blind visual field [Weiskrantz L. (1986). Blindsight: A case study and implications. Oxford: Oxford University Press]. After initial reports of basic form discrimination (Weiskrantz, 1986), it later emerged that this ability to discriminate single stimuli presented to the blind field was probably based on the discrimination of orientation cues [Weiskrantz, L. (1987). Residual vision in a scotoma. A follow-up study of 'form' discrimination. Brain, 110, 77-92]. Even so, DB found it impossible to make a 'same/different' discrimination for pairs of stimuli in the blind field (Weiskrantz, 1986). In the current study, DB's discrimination and identification of stimuli on the basis of their form was tested (in 2AFC and FR paradigms). We have demonstrated that DB could successfully identify outline low contrast images of objects, make successful 'same/different' discriminations for pairs of stimuli presented in his blind field and identify complex images (digital photographs) presented entirely within his cortically blind field. The results are discussed in relation to the issues of likely neuronal mediation, the potential for improvement in cases of blindsight and the potential relevance of these findings in relation to theories of normal visual perception. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.",
keywords = "cortical blindness, shape perception, complex images, low contrast images, spatiotemporal contrast sensitivity, residual vision, spatial channels, hemianopic field, striate cortex, visual-cortex, perception, subject, pattern, monkey",
author = "Trevethan, {Ceri T} and Arash Sahraie and Larry Weiskrantz",
year = "2007",
month = "5",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.01.022",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
pages = "2092--2103",
journal = "Neuropsychologia",
issn = "0028-3932",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Form discrimination in a case of blindsight

AU - Trevethan, Ceri T

AU - Sahraie, Arash

AU - Weiskrantz, Larry

PY - 2007/5/15

Y1 - 2007/5/15

N2 - DB, the first extensively tested blindsight case, has demonstrated the ability to detect and discriminate a range of visual stimuli presented within his perimetrically blind visual field [Weiskrantz L. (1986). Blindsight: A case study and implications. Oxford: Oxford University Press]. After initial reports of basic form discrimination (Weiskrantz, 1986), it later emerged that this ability to discriminate single stimuli presented to the blind field was probably based on the discrimination of orientation cues [Weiskrantz, L. (1987). Residual vision in a scotoma. A follow-up study of 'form' discrimination. Brain, 110, 77-92]. Even so, DB found it impossible to make a 'same/different' discrimination for pairs of stimuli in the blind field (Weiskrantz, 1986). In the current study, DB's discrimination and identification of stimuli on the basis of their form was tested (in 2AFC and FR paradigms). We have demonstrated that DB could successfully identify outline low contrast images of objects, make successful 'same/different' discriminations for pairs of stimuli presented in his blind field and identify complex images (digital photographs) presented entirely within his cortically blind field. The results are discussed in relation to the issues of likely neuronal mediation, the potential for improvement in cases of blindsight and the potential relevance of these findings in relation to theories of normal visual perception. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

AB - DB, the first extensively tested blindsight case, has demonstrated the ability to detect and discriminate a range of visual stimuli presented within his perimetrically blind visual field [Weiskrantz L. (1986). Blindsight: A case study and implications. Oxford: Oxford University Press]. After initial reports of basic form discrimination (Weiskrantz, 1986), it later emerged that this ability to discriminate single stimuli presented to the blind field was probably based on the discrimination of orientation cues [Weiskrantz, L. (1987). Residual vision in a scotoma. A follow-up study of 'form' discrimination. Brain, 110, 77-92]. Even so, DB found it impossible to make a 'same/different' discrimination for pairs of stimuli in the blind field (Weiskrantz, 1986). In the current study, DB's discrimination and identification of stimuli on the basis of their form was tested (in 2AFC and FR paradigms). We have demonstrated that DB could successfully identify outline low contrast images of objects, make successful 'same/different' discriminations for pairs of stimuli presented in his blind field and identify complex images (digital photographs) presented entirely within his cortically blind field. The results are discussed in relation to the issues of likely neuronal mediation, the potential for improvement in cases of blindsight and the potential relevance of these findings in relation to theories of normal visual perception. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

KW - cortical blindness

KW - shape perception

KW - complex images

KW - low contrast images

KW - spatiotemporal contrast sensitivity

KW - residual vision

KW - spatial channels

KW - hemianopic field

KW - striate cortex

KW - visual-cortex

KW - perception

KW - subject

KW - pattern

KW - monkey

U2 - 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.01.022

DO - 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.01.022

M3 - Article

VL - 45

SP - 2092

EP - 2103

JO - Neuropsychologia

JF - Neuropsychologia

SN - 0028-3932

IS - 9

ER -