From ‘Ban-the-Bomb’ to ‘Ban-the-Increase’

1960s Street Politics in Pre-Civil Rights Belfast

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper illuminates two forms of street politics – ‘ban-the-bomb’ and housing tenants’ protests – prevalent in Belfast in the 1960s prior to the civil rights movement (CRM). This is done to highlight the role they played in developing forms of non-violent direct action which directly contributed to the repertoires of protest utilised by the CRM. This has hitherto been downplayed in existing literature on the development of CRM. The paper also contextualises the ambivalent position that these street politics occupied regarding the question of Northern Ireland’s constitutional status, which meant that they could be co-opted by the metanarratives of groups representing nationalism and unionism. Finally, the extent to which such grassroots collective action can be viewed as part of ‘right to the city’ struggles is also examined.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)41-58
Number of pages18
JournalIrish Political Studies
Volume23
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 11 Jan 2008

Fingerprint

civil rights movement
civil rights
ban
protest
politics
collective behavior
nationalism
housing
Group

Cite this

From ‘Ban-the-Bomb’ to ‘Ban-the-Increase’ : 1960s Street Politics in Pre-Civil Rights Belfast. / Nagle, John Michael.

In: Irish Political Studies, Vol. 23, No. 1, 11.01.2008, p. 41-58.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{424742efc7c944788e63663a8d1025b1,
title = "From ‘Ban-the-Bomb’ to ‘Ban-the-Increase’: 1960s Street Politics in Pre-Civil Rights Belfast",
abstract = "This paper illuminates two forms of street politics – ‘ban-the-bomb’ and housing tenants’ protests – prevalent in Belfast in the 1960s prior to the civil rights movement (CRM). This is done to highlight the role they played in developing forms of non-violent direct action which directly contributed to the repertoires of protest utilised by the CRM. This has hitherto been downplayed in existing literature on the development of CRM. The paper also contextualises the ambivalent position that these street politics occupied regarding the question of Northern Ireland’s constitutional status, which meant that they could be co-opted by the metanarratives of groups representing nationalism and unionism. Finally, the extent to which such grassroots collective action can be viewed as part of ‘right to the city’ struggles is also examined.",
author = "Nagle, {John Michael}",
year = "2008",
month = "1",
day = "11",
doi = "10.1080/07907180701767955",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "41--58",
journal = "Irish Political Studies",
issn = "0790-7184",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - From ‘Ban-the-Bomb’ to ‘Ban-the-Increase’

T2 - 1960s Street Politics in Pre-Civil Rights Belfast

AU - Nagle, John Michael

PY - 2008/1/11

Y1 - 2008/1/11

N2 - This paper illuminates two forms of street politics – ‘ban-the-bomb’ and housing tenants’ protests – prevalent in Belfast in the 1960s prior to the civil rights movement (CRM). This is done to highlight the role they played in developing forms of non-violent direct action which directly contributed to the repertoires of protest utilised by the CRM. This has hitherto been downplayed in existing literature on the development of CRM. The paper also contextualises the ambivalent position that these street politics occupied regarding the question of Northern Ireland’s constitutional status, which meant that they could be co-opted by the metanarratives of groups representing nationalism and unionism. Finally, the extent to which such grassroots collective action can be viewed as part of ‘right to the city’ struggles is also examined.

AB - This paper illuminates two forms of street politics – ‘ban-the-bomb’ and housing tenants’ protests – prevalent in Belfast in the 1960s prior to the civil rights movement (CRM). This is done to highlight the role they played in developing forms of non-violent direct action which directly contributed to the repertoires of protest utilised by the CRM. This has hitherto been downplayed in existing literature on the development of CRM. The paper also contextualises the ambivalent position that these street politics occupied regarding the question of Northern Ireland’s constitutional status, which meant that they could be co-opted by the metanarratives of groups representing nationalism and unionism. Finally, the extent to which such grassroots collective action can be viewed as part of ‘right to the city’ struggles is also examined.

U2 - 10.1080/07907180701767955

DO - 10.1080/07907180701767955

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 41

EP - 58

JO - Irish Political Studies

JF - Irish Political Studies

SN - 0790-7184

IS - 1

ER -