Fuel poverty in the UK

Is there a difference between rural and urban areas?

Deborah Roberts (Corresponding Author), Esperanza Vera-Toscano, Euan Phimister

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)
7 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Fuel poverty is a significant policy issue. An argument often made is that rural households are more likely to be fuel poor due to the nature of rural housing stock and the more limited choice of energy sources in rural areas. This paper uses panel data to compare the level and dynamics of fuel poverty in rural and urban areas of the UK. In addition to descriptive analysis, discrete hazard models of fuel poverty exit and re-entry are estimated and used to assess the influence of housing and personal characteristics on the time spent in fuel poverty. The results indicate that, on average, the experience of fuel poverty in urban areas is longer with a higher probability of fuel poverty persistence. However, on average the rural fuel poor appear more vulnerable to energy price increases while living in private accommodation or a flat increases their probability of remaining fuel poor relative to their urban counterparts. These results indicate policy effectiveness may differ across rural and urban space. However, they also emphasise the limits of spatial targeting. Monitoring the dynamics of fuel poverty is important for ensuring that policy targets are effective and reaching those most in need.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)216-223
Number of pages8
JournalEnergy Policy
Volume87
Early online date24 Sep 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2015

Fingerprint

rural area
poverty
urban area
Reentry
panel data
targeting
Hazards
persistence
hazard
Monitoring
monitoring
energy
policy

Keywords

  • fuel poverty
  • dynamics
  • rural
  • urban
  • policy

Cite this

Fuel poverty in the UK : Is there a difference between rural and urban areas? / Roberts, Deborah (Corresponding Author); Vera-Toscano, Esperanza; Phimister, Euan.

In: Energy Policy, Vol. 87, 12.2015, p. 216-223.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{165876b8badc4727987bf545198d07dd,
title = "Fuel poverty in the UK: Is there a difference between rural and urban areas?",
abstract = "Fuel poverty is a significant policy issue. An argument often made is that rural households are more likely to be fuel poor due to the nature of rural housing stock and the more limited choice of energy sources in rural areas. This paper uses panel data to compare the level and dynamics of fuel poverty in rural and urban areas of the UK. In addition to descriptive analysis, discrete hazard models of fuel poverty exit and re-entry are estimated and used to assess the influence of housing and personal characteristics on the time spent in fuel poverty. The results indicate that, on average, the experience of fuel poverty in urban areas is longer with a higher probability of fuel poverty persistence. However, on average the rural fuel poor appear more vulnerable to energy price increases while living in private accommodation or a flat increases their probability of remaining fuel poor relative to their urban counterparts. These results indicate policy effectiveness may differ across rural and urban space. However, they also emphasise the limits of spatial targeting. Monitoring the dynamics of fuel poverty is important for ensuring that policy targets are effective and reaching those most in need.",
keywords = "fuel poverty, dynamics , rural, urban, policy",
author = "Deborah Roberts and Esperanza Vera-Toscano and Euan Phimister",
note = "Deborah Roberts acknowledges the support of funding from the Scottish Government’s Rural and Environment Science and Analytical Services Division (RESAS). We would like to thank the reviewers and editor for their valuable comments. All usual caveat apply.",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.enpol.2015.08.034",
language = "English",
volume = "87",
pages = "216--223",
journal = "Energy Policy",
issn = "0301-4215",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fuel poverty in the UK

T2 - Is there a difference between rural and urban areas?

AU - Roberts, Deborah

AU - Vera-Toscano, Esperanza

AU - Phimister, Euan

N1 - Deborah Roberts acknowledges the support of funding from the Scottish Government’s Rural and Environment Science and Analytical Services Division (RESAS). We would like to thank the reviewers and editor for their valuable comments. All usual caveat apply.

PY - 2015/12

Y1 - 2015/12

N2 - Fuel poverty is a significant policy issue. An argument often made is that rural households are more likely to be fuel poor due to the nature of rural housing stock and the more limited choice of energy sources in rural areas. This paper uses panel data to compare the level and dynamics of fuel poverty in rural and urban areas of the UK. In addition to descriptive analysis, discrete hazard models of fuel poverty exit and re-entry are estimated and used to assess the influence of housing and personal characteristics on the time spent in fuel poverty. The results indicate that, on average, the experience of fuel poverty in urban areas is longer with a higher probability of fuel poverty persistence. However, on average the rural fuel poor appear more vulnerable to energy price increases while living in private accommodation or a flat increases their probability of remaining fuel poor relative to their urban counterparts. These results indicate policy effectiveness may differ across rural and urban space. However, they also emphasise the limits of spatial targeting. Monitoring the dynamics of fuel poverty is important for ensuring that policy targets are effective and reaching those most in need.

AB - Fuel poverty is a significant policy issue. An argument often made is that rural households are more likely to be fuel poor due to the nature of rural housing stock and the more limited choice of energy sources in rural areas. This paper uses panel data to compare the level and dynamics of fuel poverty in rural and urban areas of the UK. In addition to descriptive analysis, discrete hazard models of fuel poverty exit and re-entry are estimated and used to assess the influence of housing and personal characteristics on the time spent in fuel poverty. The results indicate that, on average, the experience of fuel poverty in urban areas is longer with a higher probability of fuel poverty persistence. However, on average the rural fuel poor appear more vulnerable to energy price increases while living in private accommodation or a flat increases their probability of remaining fuel poor relative to their urban counterparts. These results indicate policy effectiveness may differ across rural and urban space. However, they also emphasise the limits of spatial targeting. Monitoring the dynamics of fuel poverty is important for ensuring that policy targets are effective and reaching those most in need.

KW - fuel poverty

KW - dynamics

KW - rural

KW - urban

KW - policy

U2 - 10.1016/j.enpol.2015.08.034

DO - 10.1016/j.enpol.2015.08.034

M3 - Article

VL - 87

SP - 216

EP - 223

JO - Energy Policy

JF - Energy Policy

SN - 0301-4215

ER -