Abstract
In multi-agent systems (MAS), abstract argumentation and argumentation schemes are increasingly important. To be useful for MAS, argumentation schemes require a computational approach so that agents can use the components of a scheme to construct and present arguments and counterarguments. This paper proposes a syntactic analysis that integrates argumentation schemes with abstract argumentation. Schemes can be analysed into the roles that propositions play in each scheme and the structure of the associated propositions, yielding a greater understanding of the schemes, a uniform method of analysis, and a systematic means to relate one scheme to another. This analysis of the schemes helps to clarify what is needed to provide denotations of the terms and predicates in a semantic model.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 113-133 |
| Number of pages | 21 |
| Journal | Argument and Computation |
| Volume | 7 |
| Issue number | 2-3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 28 Nov 2016 |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- Abstract argumentation
- Argumentation schemes
- Functional analysis
- Instantiated argumentation
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Linguistics and Language
- Computer Science Applications
- Computational Mathematics
- Artificial Intelligence
Cite this
Functional perspective on argumentation schemes. / Wyner, Adam.
In: Argument and Computation, Vol. 7, No. 2-3, 28.11.2016, p. 113-133.Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Functional perspective on argumentation schemes
AU - Wyner, Adam
N1 - This work is based on research done at University of Liverpool on the FP7-ICT-2009-4 Programme, IMPACT Project, Grant Agreement Number 247228. The Principal Investigator at Liverpool was Katie Atkinson. I particularly thank Professor Trevor Bench-Capon for many discussions and contributions on this topic. The paper is a substantive revision of a paper presented at the Ninth International Workshop on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems (ArgMAS 2012).
PY - 2016/11/28
Y1 - 2016/11/28
N2 - In multi-agent systems (MAS), abstract argumentation and argumentation schemes are increasingly important. To be useful for MAS, argumentation schemes require a computational approach so that agents can use the components of a scheme to construct and present arguments and counterarguments. This paper proposes a syntactic analysis that integrates argumentation schemes with abstract argumentation. Schemes can be analysed into the roles that propositions play in each scheme and the structure of the associated propositions, yielding a greater understanding of the schemes, a uniform method of analysis, and a systematic means to relate one scheme to another. This analysis of the schemes helps to clarify what is needed to provide denotations of the terms and predicates in a semantic model.
AB - In multi-agent systems (MAS), abstract argumentation and argumentation schemes are increasingly important. To be useful for MAS, argumentation schemes require a computational approach so that agents can use the components of a scheme to construct and present arguments and counterarguments. This paper proposes a syntactic analysis that integrates argumentation schemes with abstract argumentation. Schemes can be analysed into the roles that propositions play in each scheme and the structure of the associated propositions, yielding a greater understanding of the schemes, a uniform method of analysis, and a systematic means to relate one scheme to another. This analysis of the schemes helps to clarify what is needed to provide denotations of the terms and predicates in a semantic model.
KW - Abstract argumentation
KW - Argumentation schemes
KW - Functional analysis
KW - Instantiated argumentation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85015302884&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3233/AAC-160010
DO - 10.3233/AAC-160010
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85015302884
VL - 7
SP - 113
EP - 133
JO - Argument and Computation
JF - Argument and Computation
SN - 1946-2166
IS - 2-3
ER -