Future thinking instructions improve prospective memory performance in adolescents

Mareike Altgassen*, Anett Kretschmer, Katharina Marlene Schnitzspahn

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)
3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Studies on prospective memory (PM) development in adolescents point to age-related increases through to adulthood. The goal of the present study was to examine whether instructing adolescents to engage in an episodic prospection of themselves executing future actions (i.e., future thinking) when forming an intention would improve their PM performance and reduce age-related differences. Further, we set out to explore whether future thinking instructions result in stronger memory traces and/or stronger cue–context associations by evaluating retrospective memory for the PM cues after task completion and monitoring costs during PM task processing. Adolescents and young adults were allocated to either the future thinking, repeated-encoding or standard condition. As expected, adolescents had fewer correct PM responses than young adults. Across age groups, PM performance in the standard condition was lower than in the other encoding conditions. Importantly, the results indicate a significant interaction of age by encoding condition. While adolescents benefited most from future thinking instructions, young adults performed best in the repeated-encoding condition. The results also indicate that the beneficial effects of future thinking may result from deeper intention-encoding through the simulation of future task performance.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)536-553
Number of pages18
JournalChild Neuropsychology
Volume23
Issue number5
Early online date28 Mar 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

Episodic Memory
Young Adult
Adolescent Development
Task Performance and Analysis
Cues
Thinking
Age Groups
Costs and Cost Analysis

Keywords

  • Adolescence
  • Executive functions
  • Future thinking
  • Imagery
  • Prospective memory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology

Cite this

Future thinking instructions improve prospective memory performance in adolescents. / Altgassen, Mareike; Kretschmer, Anett; Schnitzspahn, Katharina Marlene.

In: Child Neuropsychology, Vol. 23, No. 5, 2017, p. 536-553.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{86dc48a589a242eeafcf2ddefda0b9ff,
title = "Future thinking instructions improve prospective memory performance in adolescents",
abstract = "Studies on prospective memory (PM) development in adolescents point to age-related increases through to adulthood. The goal of the present study was to examine whether instructing adolescents to engage in an episodic prospection of themselves executing future actions (i.e., future thinking) when forming an intention would improve their PM performance and reduce age-related differences. Further, we set out to explore whether future thinking instructions result in stronger memory traces and/or stronger cue–context associations by evaluating retrospective memory for the PM cues after task completion and monitoring costs during PM task processing. Adolescents and young adults were allocated to either the future thinking, repeated-encoding or standard condition. As expected, adolescents had fewer correct PM responses than young adults. Across age groups, PM performance in the standard condition was lower than in the other encoding conditions. Importantly, the results indicate a significant interaction of age by encoding condition. While adolescents benefited most from future thinking instructions, young adults performed best in the repeated-encoding condition. The results also indicate that the beneficial effects of future thinking may result from deeper intention-encoding through the simulation of future task performance.",
keywords = "Adolescence, Executive functions, Future thinking, Imagery, Prospective memory",
author = "Mareike Altgassen and Anett Kretschmer and Schnitzspahn, {Katharina Marlene}",
note = "Funding This work was supported by the German Research Foundation [DFG grants SFB 940/1]. Acknowledgements We would like to thank Lia Kvavilashvili for her helpful comments on this study during the International Conference on Prospective Memory (ICPM4) in Naples, Italy, 2014. We thank Daniel P. Sheppard for proofreading the manuscript.",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1080/09297049.2016.1158247",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "536--553",
journal = "Child Neuropsychology",
issn = "0929-7049",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Future thinking instructions improve prospective memory performance in adolescents

AU - Altgassen, Mareike

AU - Kretschmer, Anett

AU - Schnitzspahn, Katharina Marlene

N1 - Funding This work was supported by the German Research Foundation [DFG grants SFB 940/1]. Acknowledgements We would like to thank Lia Kvavilashvili for her helpful comments on this study during the International Conference on Prospective Memory (ICPM4) in Naples, Italy, 2014. We thank Daniel P. Sheppard for proofreading the manuscript.

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Studies on prospective memory (PM) development in adolescents point to age-related increases through to adulthood. The goal of the present study was to examine whether instructing adolescents to engage in an episodic prospection of themselves executing future actions (i.e., future thinking) when forming an intention would improve their PM performance and reduce age-related differences. Further, we set out to explore whether future thinking instructions result in stronger memory traces and/or stronger cue–context associations by evaluating retrospective memory for the PM cues after task completion and monitoring costs during PM task processing. Adolescents and young adults were allocated to either the future thinking, repeated-encoding or standard condition. As expected, adolescents had fewer correct PM responses than young adults. Across age groups, PM performance in the standard condition was lower than in the other encoding conditions. Importantly, the results indicate a significant interaction of age by encoding condition. While adolescents benefited most from future thinking instructions, young adults performed best in the repeated-encoding condition. The results also indicate that the beneficial effects of future thinking may result from deeper intention-encoding through the simulation of future task performance.

AB - Studies on prospective memory (PM) development in adolescents point to age-related increases through to adulthood. The goal of the present study was to examine whether instructing adolescents to engage in an episodic prospection of themselves executing future actions (i.e., future thinking) when forming an intention would improve their PM performance and reduce age-related differences. Further, we set out to explore whether future thinking instructions result in stronger memory traces and/or stronger cue–context associations by evaluating retrospective memory for the PM cues after task completion and monitoring costs during PM task processing. Adolescents and young adults were allocated to either the future thinking, repeated-encoding or standard condition. As expected, adolescents had fewer correct PM responses than young adults. Across age groups, PM performance in the standard condition was lower than in the other encoding conditions. Importantly, the results indicate a significant interaction of age by encoding condition. While adolescents benefited most from future thinking instructions, young adults performed best in the repeated-encoding condition. The results also indicate that the beneficial effects of future thinking may result from deeper intention-encoding through the simulation of future task performance.

KW - Adolescence

KW - Executive functions

KW - Future thinking

KW - Imagery

KW - Prospective memory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84961564461&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/09297049.2016.1158247

DO - 10.1080/09297049.2016.1158247

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 536

EP - 553

JO - Child Neuropsychology

JF - Child Neuropsychology

SN - 0929-7049

IS - 5

ER -