Geikie's field researches and their geological controversies

Robert W H Butler, Stephen J Matthews, Richard K Morgan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)
3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Archibald Geikie's (1835-1924) field research led to better understanding of geological relationships and, ultimately, earth processes. We consider three pieces of research in Scotland, from his early work on Skye through the execution and impact of his 1860 expedition to the NW Highlands with Murchison, returning to Skye to consider arguments with Judd on igneous relationships. We describe the field locations and place modern interpretations in their historical context. We discuss how methods and approaches for building interpretations in the field were modified and improved through debates. Reliance on a few "critical outcrops" served to anchor interpretation at the
expense of understanding more complex exposures. Similar bias appears to have arisen from using simple exploratory transects which were only mitigated by proper mapping approaches. Significant misunderstandings between protagonists appear to have arisen through the reliance of text description rather than diagrammatic illustrations. The vitriolic nature of debate seems to have anchored misinterpretations, obscured interpretational uncertainty and promoted false-reasoning by inhibiting inclusive scientific engagement.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)149-178
Number of pages30
JournalGeological Society Special Publications
Volume480
Early online date18 Apr 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Fingerprint

Anchors
anchor
outcrop
transect
Earth (planet)
exposure
method
Uncertainty

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Water Science and Technology
  • Ocean Engineering
  • Geology

Cite this

Geikie's field researches and their geological controversies. / Butler, Robert W H ; Matthews, Stephen J; Morgan, Richard K.

In: Geological Society Special Publications , Vol. 480, 2019, p. 149-178.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Butler, Robert W H ; Matthews, Stephen J ; Morgan, Richard K. / Geikie's field researches and their geological controversies. In: Geological Society Special Publications . 2019 ; Vol. 480. pp. 149-178.
@article{6af63e3a2229438ab6294025bba3ecc8,
title = "Geikie's field researches and their geological controversies",
abstract = "Archibald Geikie's (1835-1924) field research led to better understanding of geological relationships and, ultimately, earth processes. We consider three pieces of research in Scotland, from his early work on Skye through the execution and impact of his 1860 expedition to the NW Highlands with Murchison, returning to Skye to consider arguments with Judd on igneous relationships. We describe the field locations and place modern interpretations in their historical context. We discuss how methods and approaches for building interpretations in the field were modified and improved through debates. Reliance on a few {"}critical outcrops{"} served to anchor interpretation at theexpense of understanding more complex exposures. Similar bias appears to have arisen from using simple exploratory transects which were only mitigated by proper mapping approaches. Significant misunderstandings between protagonists appear to have arisen through the reliance of text description rather than diagrammatic illustrations. The vitriolic nature of debate seems to have anchored misinterpretations, obscured interpretational uncertainty and promoted false-reasoning by inhibiting inclusive scientific engagement.",
author = "Butler, {Robert W H} and Matthews, {Stephen J} and Morgan, {Richard K}",
note = "All of us were introduced to the Moine Thrust Belt and its controversies by the late Mike Coward. We are indebted to him for instilling a passion for structural geology, challenging conventional wisdom and for tales of early protagonists. We also thank the late John Mendum, who kindly shared a copy of his notes on the Highlands Controversy, together with Robert Neller, Collections Officer at Haslemere Educational Museum, for facilitating access to Geikie’s field-notes and artwork.",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1144/SP480.5",
language = "English",
volume = "480",
pages = "149--178",
journal = "Geological Society Special Publications",
issn = "0305-8719",
publisher = "Geological Society of London",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Geikie's field researches and their geological controversies

AU - Butler, Robert W H

AU - Matthews, Stephen J

AU - Morgan, Richard K

N1 - All of us were introduced to the Moine Thrust Belt and its controversies by the late Mike Coward. We are indebted to him for instilling a passion for structural geology, challenging conventional wisdom and for tales of early protagonists. We also thank the late John Mendum, who kindly shared a copy of his notes on the Highlands Controversy, together with Robert Neller, Collections Officer at Haslemere Educational Museum, for facilitating access to Geikie’s field-notes and artwork.

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Archibald Geikie's (1835-1924) field research led to better understanding of geological relationships and, ultimately, earth processes. We consider three pieces of research in Scotland, from his early work on Skye through the execution and impact of his 1860 expedition to the NW Highlands with Murchison, returning to Skye to consider arguments with Judd on igneous relationships. We describe the field locations and place modern interpretations in their historical context. We discuss how methods and approaches for building interpretations in the field were modified and improved through debates. Reliance on a few "critical outcrops" served to anchor interpretation at theexpense of understanding more complex exposures. Similar bias appears to have arisen from using simple exploratory transects which were only mitigated by proper mapping approaches. Significant misunderstandings between protagonists appear to have arisen through the reliance of text description rather than diagrammatic illustrations. The vitriolic nature of debate seems to have anchored misinterpretations, obscured interpretational uncertainty and promoted false-reasoning by inhibiting inclusive scientific engagement.

AB - Archibald Geikie's (1835-1924) field research led to better understanding of geological relationships and, ultimately, earth processes. We consider three pieces of research in Scotland, from his early work on Skye through the execution and impact of his 1860 expedition to the NW Highlands with Murchison, returning to Skye to consider arguments with Judd on igneous relationships. We describe the field locations and place modern interpretations in their historical context. We discuss how methods and approaches for building interpretations in the field were modified and improved through debates. Reliance on a few "critical outcrops" served to anchor interpretation at theexpense of understanding more complex exposures. Similar bias appears to have arisen from using simple exploratory transects which were only mitigated by proper mapping approaches. Significant misunderstandings between protagonists appear to have arisen through the reliance of text description rather than diagrammatic illustrations. The vitriolic nature of debate seems to have anchored misinterpretations, obscured interpretational uncertainty and promoted false-reasoning by inhibiting inclusive scientific engagement.

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/geikies-field-researches-geological-controversies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068408293&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1144/SP480.5

DO - 10.1144/SP480.5

M3 - Article

VL - 480

SP - 149

EP - 178

JO - Geological Society Special Publications

JF - Geological Society Special Publications

SN - 0305-8719

ER -