General anaesthesia versus local anaesthesia for carotid surgery (GALA)

a multicentre, randomised controlled trial

C Counsell (Collaborator), GALA Trial Collaborative Group

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

379 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background The effect of carotid endarterectomy in lowering the risk of stroke ipsilateral to severe atherosclerotic carotid-artery stenosis is offset by complications during or soon after surgery. We compared surgery under general anaesthesia with that under local anaesthesia because prediction and avoidance of perioperative strokes might be easier under local anaesthesia than under general anaesthesia.
Methods We undertook a parallel group, multicentre, randomised controlled trial of 3526 patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic carotid stenosis from 95 centres in 24 countries. Participants were randomly assigned to surgery under general (n=1753) or local (n=1773) anaesthesia between June, 1999 and October, 2007. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with stroke (including retinal infarction), myocardial infarction, or death between randomisation and 30 days after surgery. Analysis was by intention to treat. The trial is registered with Current Control Trials number ISRCTNO0525237.
Findings A primary outcome occurred in 84 (4.8%) patients assigned to surgery under general anaesthesia and 80 (4 . 5%) of those assigned to surgery under local anaesthesia; three events per 1000 treated were prevented with local anaesthesia (95% CI -11 to 17; risk ratio [RR] 0 . 94 [95% CI 0 . 70 to 1. 27]). The two groups did not significantly differ for quality of life, length of hospital stay, or the primary outcome in the prespecified subgroups of age, contralateral carotid occlusion, and baseline surgical risk.
Interpretation We have not shown a definite difference in outcomes between general and local anaesthesia for carotid surgery. The anaesthetist and surgeon, in consultation with the patient, should decide which anaesthetic technique to use on an individual basis.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2132-2142
Number of pages11
JournalThe Lancet
Volume372
Issue number9656
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 Dec 2008

Fingerprint

Local Anesthesia
General Anesthesia
Randomized Controlled Trials
Carotid Stenosis
Stroke
Length of Stay
Intention to Treat Analysis
Carotid Endarterectomy
Random Allocation
Ambulatory Surgical Procedures
Infarction
Anesthetics
Referral and Consultation
Anesthesia
Odds Ratio
Myocardial Infarction
Quality of Life

Keywords

  • endarterectomy
  • stenosis

Cite this

General anaesthesia versus local anaesthesia for carotid surgery (GALA) : a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. / Counsell, C (Collaborator); GALA Trial Collaborative Group.

In: The Lancet, Vol. 372, No. 9656, 20.12.2008, p. 2132-2142.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f8a363246eb0433c86bb43c0dd7623bf,
title = "General anaesthesia versus local anaesthesia for carotid surgery (GALA): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial",
abstract = "Background The effect of carotid endarterectomy in lowering the risk of stroke ipsilateral to severe atherosclerotic carotid-artery stenosis is offset by complications during or soon after surgery. We compared surgery under general anaesthesia with that under local anaesthesia because prediction and avoidance of perioperative strokes might be easier under local anaesthesia than under general anaesthesia. Methods We undertook a parallel group, multicentre, randomised controlled trial of 3526 patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic carotid stenosis from 95 centres in 24 countries. Participants were randomly assigned to surgery under general (n=1753) or local (n=1773) anaesthesia between June, 1999 and October, 2007. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with stroke (including retinal infarction), myocardial infarction, or death between randomisation and 30 days after surgery. Analysis was by intention to treat. The trial is registered with Current Control Trials number ISRCTNO0525237. Findings A primary outcome occurred in 84 (4.8{\%}) patients assigned to surgery under general anaesthesia and 80 (4 . 5{\%}) of those assigned to surgery under local anaesthesia; three events per 1000 treated were prevented with local anaesthesia (95{\%} CI -11 to 17; risk ratio [RR] 0 . 94 [95{\%} CI 0 . 70 to 1. 27]). The two groups did not significantly differ for quality of life, length of hospital stay, or the primary outcome in the prespecified subgroups of age, contralateral carotid occlusion, and baseline surgical risk. Interpretation We have not shown a definite difference in outcomes between general and local anaesthesia for carotid surgery. The anaesthetist and surgeon, in consultation with the patient, should decide which anaesthetic technique to use on an individual basis.",
keywords = "endarterectomy, stenosis",
author = "C Counsell and {GALA Trial Collaborative Group}",
year = "2008",
month = "12",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61699-2",
language = "English",
volume = "372",
pages = "2132--2142",
journal = "The Lancet",
issn = "0140-6736",
publisher = "ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE",
number = "9656",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - General anaesthesia versus local anaesthesia for carotid surgery (GALA)

T2 - a multicentre, randomised controlled trial

AU - GALA Trial Collaborative Group

A2 - Counsell, C

PY - 2008/12/20

Y1 - 2008/12/20

N2 - Background The effect of carotid endarterectomy in lowering the risk of stroke ipsilateral to severe atherosclerotic carotid-artery stenosis is offset by complications during or soon after surgery. We compared surgery under general anaesthesia with that under local anaesthesia because prediction and avoidance of perioperative strokes might be easier under local anaesthesia than under general anaesthesia. Methods We undertook a parallel group, multicentre, randomised controlled trial of 3526 patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic carotid stenosis from 95 centres in 24 countries. Participants were randomly assigned to surgery under general (n=1753) or local (n=1773) anaesthesia between June, 1999 and October, 2007. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with stroke (including retinal infarction), myocardial infarction, or death between randomisation and 30 days after surgery. Analysis was by intention to treat. The trial is registered with Current Control Trials number ISRCTNO0525237. Findings A primary outcome occurred in 84 (4.8%) patients assigned to surgery under general anaesthesia and 80 (4 . 5%) of those assigned to surgery under local anaesthesia; three events per 1000 treated were prevented with local anaesthesia (95% CI -11 to 17; risk ratio [RR] 0 . 94 [95% CI 0 . 70 to 1. 27]). The two groups did not significantly differ for quality of life, length of hospital stay, or the primary outcome in the prespecified subgroups of age, contralateral carotid occlusion, and baseline surgical risk. Interpretation We have not shown a definite difference in outcomes between general and local anaesthesia for carotid surgery. The anaesthetist and surgeon, in consultation with the patient, should decide which anaesthetic technique to use on an individual basis.

AB - Background The effect of carotid endarterectomy in lowering the risk of stroke ipsilateral to severe atherosclerotic carotid-artery stenosis is offset by complications during or soon after surgery. We compared surgery under general anaesthesia with that under local anaesthesia because prediction and avoidance of perioperative strokes might be easier under local anaesthesia than under general anaesthesia. Methods We undertook a parallel group, multicentre, randomised controlled trial of 3526 patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic carotid stenosis from 95 centres in 24 countries. Participants were randomly assigned to surgery under general (n=1753) or local (n=1773) anaesthesia between June, 1999 and October, 2007. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with stroke (including retinal infarction), myocardial infarction, or death between randomisation and 30 days after surgery. Analysis was by intention to treat. The trial is registered with Current Control Trials number ISRCTNO0525237. Findings A primary outcome occurred in 84 (4.8%) patients assigned to surgery under general anaesthesia and 80 (4 . 5%) of those assigned to surgery under local anaesthesia; three events per 1000 treated were prevented with local anaesthesia (95% CI -11 to 17; risk ratio [RR] 0 . 94 [95% CI 0 . 70 to 1. 27]). The two groups did not significantly differ for quality of life, length of hospital stay, or the primary outcome in the prespecified subgroups of age, contralateral carotid occlusion, and baseline surgical risk. Interpretation We have not shown a definite difference in outcomes between general and local anaesthesia for carotid surgery. The anaesthetist and surgeon, in consultation with the patient, should decide which anaesthetic technique to use on an individual basis.

KW - endarterectomy

KW - stenosis

U2 - 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61699-2

DO - 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61699-2

M3 - Article

VL - 372

SP - 2132

EP - 2142

JO - The Lancet

JF - The Lancet

SN - 0140-6736

IS - 9656

ER -