Genetic professionals' reports of nondisclosure of genetic risk information within families

Angus Clarke, Martin Richards, Lauren Kerzin-Storrar, Jane Halliday, Mary Anne Young, Sheila A Simpson, Katie Featherstone, Karen Forrest, Anneke Lucassen, Patrick J Morrison, Oliver W J Quarrell, Helen Stewart, Karen Forrest-Keenan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

81 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Patients attending genetic clinics are often the main gatekeepers of information for other family members. There has been much debate about the circumstances under which professionals may have an obligation, or may be permitted, to pass on personal genetic information about their clients but without their consent to other family members. We report findings from the first prospective study investigating the frequency with which genetics professionals become concerned about the failure of clients to pass on such information to their relatives. In all, 12 UK and two Australian regional genetic services reported such cases over 12 months, including details of actions taken by professionals in response to the clients' failure to disclose information. A total of 65 cases of nondisclosure were reported, representing <1% of the genetic clinic consultations in the collaborating centres during the study period. These included 39 cases of the failure of parents not passing full information to their adult offspring, 22 cases where siblings or other relatives were not given information and four cases where information was withheld from partners – including former and prospective partners. Professionals reported clients' reasons for withholding information as complex, more often citing concern and the desire to shield relatives from distress rather than poor family relationships. In most cases, the professionals took further steps to persuade their clients to make a disclosure but in no instance did the professional force a disclosure without the client's consent.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)556-562
Number of pages7
JournalEJHG : European journal of human genetics : the official journal of the European Society of Human Genetics.
Volume13
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2005

Keywords

  • attitude of health personnel
  • Australia
  • confidentiality
  • disclosure
  • family health
  • genetic counselling
  • Genetic Diseases, Inborn
  • Genetics, Medical
  • Great Britain
  • humans
  • prospective studies
  • risk factors
  • Huntingdons disease
  • ovarian cancer
  • relatives
  • communication
  • ethics
  • experience
  • breast

Cite this

Genetic professionals' reports of nondisclosure of genetic risk information within families. / Clarke, Angus; Richards, Martin; Kerzin-Storrar, Lauren; Halliday, Jane; Young, Mary Anne; Simpson, Sheila A; Featherstone, Katie; Forrest, Karen; Lucassen, Anneke; Morrison, Patrick J; Quarrell, Oliver W J; Stewart, Helen; Forrest-Keenan, Karen.

In: EJHG : European journal of human genetics : the official journal of the European Society of Human Genetics. , Vol. 13, No. 5, 01.05.2005, p. 556-562.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Clarke, A, Richards, M, Kerzin-Storrar, L, Halliday, J, Young, MA, Simpson, SA, Featherstone, K, Forrest, K, Lucassen, A, Morrison, PJ, Quarrell, OWJ, Stewart, H & Forrest-Keenan, K 2005, 'Genetic professionals' reports of nondisclosure of genetic risk information within families', EJHG : European journal of human genetics : the official journal of the European Society of Human Genetics. , vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 556-562. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201394
Clarke, Angus ; Richards, Martin ; Kerzin-Storrar, Lauren ; Halliday, Jane ; Young, Mary Anne ; Simpson, Sheila A ; Featherstone, Katie ; Forrest, Karen ; Lucassen, Anneke ; Morrison, Patrick J ; Quarrell, Oliver W J ; Stewart, Helen ; Forrest-Keenan, Karen. / Genetic professionals' reports of nondisclosure of genetic risk information within families. In: EJHG : European journal of human genetics : the official journal of the European Society of Human Genetics. . 2005 ; Vol. 13, No. 5. pp. 556-562.
@article{028f02784d3149f993946f29745cd869,
title = "Genetic professionals' reports of nondisclosure of genetic risk information within families",
abstract = "Patients attending genetic clinics are often the main gatekeepers of information for other family members. There has been much debate about the circumstances under which professionals may have an obligation, or may be permitted, to pass on personal genetic information about their clients but without their consent to other family members. We report findings from the first prospective study investigating the frequency with which genetics professionals become concerned about the failure of clients to pass on such information to their relatives. In all, 12 UK and two Australian regional genetic services reported such cases over 12 months, including details of actions taken by professionals in response to the clients' failure to disclose information. A total of 65 cases of nondisclosure were reported, representing <1{\%} of the genetic clinic consultations in the collaborating centres during the study period. These included 39 cases of the failure of parents not passing full information to their adult offspring, 22 cases where siblings or other relatives were not given information and four cases where information was withheld from partners – including former and prospective partners. Professionals reported clients' reasons for withholding information as complex, more often citing concern and the desire to shield relatives from distress rather than poor family relationships. In most cases, the professionals took further steps to persuade their clients to make a disclosure but in no instance did the professional force a disclosure without the client's consent.",
keywords = "attitude of health personnel, Australia, confidentiality, disclosure, family health, genetic counselling, Genetic Diseases, Inborn, Genetics, Medical, Great Britain, humans, prospective studies, risk factors, Huntingdons disease, ovarian cancer, relatives, communication, ethics, experience, breast",
author = "Angus Clarke and Martin Richards and Lauren Kerzin-Storrar and Jane Halliday and Young, {Mary Anne} and Simpson, {Sheila A} and Katie Featherstone and Karen Forrest and Anneke Lucassen and Morrison, {Patrick J} and Quarrell, {Oliver W J} and Helen Stewart and Karen Forrest-Keenan",
year = "2005",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201394",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "556--562",
journal = "EJHG : European journal of human genetics : the official journal of the European Society of Human Genetics.",
issn = "1018-4813",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Genetic professionals' reports of nondisclosure of genetic risk information within families

AU - Clarke, Angus

AU - Richards, Martin

AU - Kerzin-Storrar, Lauren

AU - Halliday, Jane

AU - Young, Mary Anne

AU - Simpson, Sheila A

AU - Featherstone, Katie

AU - Forrest, Karen

AU - Lucassen, Anneke

AU - Morrison, Patrick J

AU - Quarrell, Oliver W J

AU - Stewart, Helen

AU - Forrest-Keenan, Karen

PY - 2005/5/1

Y1 - 2005/5/1

N2 - Patients attending genetic clinics are often the main gatekeepers of information for other family members. There has been much debate about the circumstances under which professionals may have an obligation, or may be permitted, to pass on personal genetic information about their clients but without their consent to other family members. We report findings from the first prospective study investigating the frequency with which genetics professionals become concerned about the failure of clients to pass on such information to their relatives. In all, 12 UK and two Australian regional genetic services reported such cases over 12 months, including details of actions taken by professionals in response to the clients' failure to disclose information. A total of 65 cases of nondisclosure were reported, representing <1% of the genetic clinic consultations in the collaborating centres during the study period. These included 39 cases of the failure of parents not passing full information to their adult offspring, 22 cases where siblings or other relatives were not given information and four cases where information was withheld from partners – including former and prospective partners. Professionals reported clients' reasons for withholding information as complex, more often citing concern and the desire to shield relatives from distress rather than poor family relationships. In most cases, the professionals took further steps to persuade their clients to make a disclosure but in no instance did the professional force a disclosure without the client's consent.

AB - Patients attending genetic clinics are often the main gatekeepers of information for other family members. There has been much debate about the circumstances under which professionals may have an obligation, or may be permitted, to pass on personal genetic information about their clients but without their consent to other family members. We report findings from the first prospective study investigating the frequency with which genetics professionals become concerned about the failure of clients to pass on such information to their relatives. In all, 12 UK and two Australian regional genetic services reported such cases over 12 months, including details of actions taken by professionals in response to the clients' failure to disclose information. A total of 65 cases of nondisclosure were reported, representing <1% of the genetic clinic consultations in the collaborating centres during the study period. These included 39 cases of the failure of parents not passing full information to their adult offspring, 22 cases where siblings or other relatives were not given information and four cases where information was withheld from partners – including former and prospective partners. Professionals reported clients' reasons for withholding information as complex, more often citing concern and the desire to shield relatives from distress rather than poor family relationships. In most cases, the professionals took further steps to persuade their clients to make a disclosure but in no instance did the professional force a disclosure without the client's consent.

KW - attitude of health personnel

KW - Australia

KW - confidentiality

KW - disclosure

KW - family health

KW - genetic counselling

KW - Genetic Diseases, Inborn

KW - Genetics, Medical

KW - Great Britain

KW - humans

KW - prospective studies

KW - risk factors

KW - Huntingdons disease

KW - ovarian cancer

KW - relatives

KW - communication

KW - ethics

KW - experience

KW - breast

U2 - 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201394

DO - 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201394

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 556

EP - 562

JO - EJHG : European journal of human genetics : the official journal of the European Society of Human Genetics.

JF - EJHG : European journal of human genetics : the official journal of the European Society of Human Genetics.

SN - 1018-4813

IS - 5

ER -