TY - JOUR
T1 - Gestational weight gain outside the Institute of Medicine recommendations and adverse pregnancy outcomes
T2 - Analysis using individual participant data from randomised trials
AU - Rogozińska, Ewelina
AU - Zamora, Javier
AU - Marlin, Nadine
AU - Betrán, Ana Pilar
AU - Astrup, Arne
AU - Bogaerts, Annick
AU - Cecatti, Jose G.
AU - Dodd, Jodie M.
AU - Facchinetti, Fabio
AU - Geiker, Nina R.W.
AU - Haakstad, Lene A.H.
AU - Hauner, Hans
AU - Jensen, Dorte M.
AU - Kinnunen, Tarja I.
AU - Mol, Ben W.J.
AU - Owens, Julie
AU - Phelan, Suzanne
AU - Renault, Kristina M.
AU - Salvesen, Kjell
AU - Shub, Alexis
AU - Surita, Fernanda G.
AU - Stafne, Signe N.
AU - Teede, Helena
AU - Van Poppel, Mireille N.M.
AU - Vinter, Christina A.
AU - Khan, Khalid S.
AU - Thangaratinam, Shakila
AU - Coomarasamy, Arri
AU - Devlieger, Roland
AU - El Beltagy, Nermean
AU - Guelfi, Kym
AU - Harrison, Cheryce
AU - Khoury, Janette
AU - Luoto, Riitta
AU - Mørkved, Siv
AU - Motahari, Narges
AU - McAuliffe, Fionnuala
AU - Perales, Maria
AU - Petrella, Elisabetta
AU - Poston, Lucilla
AU - Rauh, Kathrin
AU - Sagedal, Linda R.
AU - Scudeller, Tânia T.
AU - Shen, Gary X.
AU - Tonstad, Serena
AU - Vistad, Ingvild
AU - Vitolo, Marcia
AU - Yeo, Seonae
N1 - Acknowledgements
We acknowledge all researchers, research nurses and staff of the
participating centres in the trials contributing to this IPD meta-analysis and
all members of *i-WIP Collaborative Group: Arne Astrup, Ruben C Barakat,
Annick Bogaerts, Jose G Cecatti, Jodie M Dodd, Arri Coomarasamy, Roland
Devlieger, Nermean El Beltagy, Fabio Facchinetti, Nina RW Geiker, Kym Guelfi,
Lene AH Haakstad, Cheryce Harrison, Hans Hauner, Dorte M Jensen, Tarja I
Kinnunen, Khalid S Khan, Janette Khoury, Riitta Luoto, Ben W Mol, Siv
Mørkved, Narges Motahari, Fionnuala McAuliffe, Julie Owens, Maria Perales,
Elisabetta Petrella, Suzanne Phelan, Lucilla Poston, Mireille van Poppel, Kathrin
Rauh, Kristina M Renault, Ewelina Rogozińska, Linda R Sagedal, Kjell A
Salvesen, Tânia T Scudeller, Gary X Shen, Alexis Shub, Signe N Stafne,
Fernanda Surita, Helena Teede, Shakila Thangaratinam, Serena Tonstad,
Christina A Vinter, Ingvild Vistad, Marcia Vitolo, Seonae Yeo.
Authors’ contributions
ER, JZ, ST, APB and KSK specified the research objectives. ER, NM and JZ
conducted the work and statistical analyses. Following members of the i-WIP
Collaborative Group AA, AB, JGC, JMD, FF, NRWG, LH, HH, DMJ, TIK, BWJM,
JO, SP, KMR, KAS, AS, FGS, SNS, HT, MvP, and CAV contributed primary data
to the project and provided input to clinical interpretation of its findings. ER,
APB, KSK drafted the initial manuscript. All authors reviewed and critically
appraised the final draft of the report. All authors read and approved the
final manuscript.
Funding
The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment
programme (No. 12/01/50) and World Health Organization Research Training
Fellowship received by ER during conduct of this study.
PY - 2019/9/2
Y1 - 2019/9/2
N2 - Background: High Body Mass Index (BMI) and gestational weight gain (GWG) affect an increasing number of pregnancies. The Institute of Medicine (IOM) has issued recommendations on the optimal GWG for women according to their pre-pregnancy BMI (healthy, overweight or obese). It has been shown that pregnant women rarely met the recommendations; however, it is unclear by how much. Previous studies also adjusted the analyses for various women's characteristics making their comparison challenging. Methods: We analysed individual participant data (IPD) of healthy women with a singleton pregnancy and a BMI of 18.5 kg/m2 or more from the control arms of 36 randomised trials (16 countries). Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to describe the association between GWG outside (above or below) the IOM recommendations (2009) and risks of caesarean section, preterm birth, and large or small for gestational age (LGA or SGA) infants. The association was examined overall, within the BMI categories and by quartile of GWG departure from the IOM recommendations. We obtained aOR using mixed-effects logistic regression, accounting for the within-study clustering and a priori identified characteristics. Results: Out of 4429 women (from 33 trials) meeting the inclusion criteria, two thirds gained weight outside the IOM recommendations (1646 above; 1291 below). The median GWG outside the IOM recommendations was 3.1 kg above and 2.7 kg below. In comparison to GWG within the IOM recommendations, GWG above was associated with increased odds of caesarean section (aOR 1.50; 95%CI 1.25, 1.80), LGA (2.00; 1.58, 2.54), and reduced odds of SGA (0.66; 0.50, 0.87); no significant effect on preterm birth was detected. The relationship between GWG below the IOM recommendation and caesarean section or LGA was inconclusive; however, the odds of preterm birth (1.94; 1.31, 2.28) and SGA (1.52; 1.18, 1.96) were increased. Conclusions: Consistently with previous findings, adherence to the IOM recommendations seem to help achieve better pregnancy outcomes. Nevertheless, even in the context of clinical trials, women find it difficult to adhere to them. Further research should focus on identifying ways of achieving a healthier GWG as defined by the IOM recommendations.
AB - Background: High Body Mass Index (BMI) and gestational weight gain (GWG) affect an increasing number of pregnancies. The Institute of Medicine (IOM) has issued recommendations on the optimal GWG for women according to their pre-pregnancy BMI (healthy, overweight or obese). It has been shown that pregnant women rarely met the recommendations; however, it is unclear by how much. Previous studies also adjusted the analyses for various women's characteristics making their comparison challenging. Methods: We analysed individual participant data (IPD) of healthy women with a singleton pregnancy and a BMI of 18.5 kg/m2 or more from the control arms of 36 randomised trials (16 countries). Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to describe the association between GWG outside (above or below) the IOM recommendations (2009) and risks of caesarean section, preterm birth, and large or small for gestational age (LGA or SGA) infants. The association was examined overall, within the BMI categories and by quartile of GWG departure from the IOM recommendations. We obtained aOR using mixed-effects logistic regression, accounting for the within-study clustering and a priori identified characteristics. Results: Out of 4429 women (from 33 trials) meeting the inclusion criteria, two thirds gained weight outside the IOM recommendations (1646 above; 1291 below). The median GWG outside the IOM recommendations was 3.1 kg above and 2.7 kg below. In comparison to GWG within the IOM recommendations, GWG above was associated with increased odds of caesarean section (aOR 1.50; 95%CI 1.25, 1.80), LGA (2.00; 1.58, 2.54), and reduced odds of SGA (0.66; 0.50, 0.87); no significant effect on preterm birth was detected. The relationship between GWG below the IOM recommendation and caesarean section or LGA was inconclusive; however, the odds of preterm birth (1.94; 1.31, 2.28) and SGA (1.52; 1.18, 1.96) were increased. Conclusions: Consistently with previous findings, adherence to the IOM recommendations seem to help achieve better pregnancy outcomes. Nevertheless, even in the context of clinical trials, women find it difficult to adhere to them. Further research should focus on identifying ways of achieving a healthier GWG as defined by the IOM recommendations.
KW - Body mass index
KW - Gestational weight gain
KW - Individual participant data
KW - Institute of Medicine
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071749301&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s12884-019-2472-7
DO - 10.1186/s12884-019-2472-7
M3 - Article
C2 - 31477075
AN - SCOPUS:85071749301
VL - 19
SP - 1
EP - 12
JO - BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
JF - BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
SN - 1471-2393
IS - 1
M1 - 322
ER -