Giving voters what they want?

Party orientation perceptions and preferences in the British electorate

Robert A. Johns, Heinz Brandenburg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Some of the most important propositions in the political marketing literature hinge on assumptions about the electorate. In particular, voters are presumed to react in different ways to different orientations or postures. Yet there are theoretical reasons for questioning some of these assumptions, and certainly they have seldom been empirically tested. Here, we focus on one prominent example of political marketing research: Lees-Marshment’s orientations’ model. We investigate how the public reacts to product and market orientation, whether they see a trade-off between the two (a point in dispute among political marketing scholars), and whether partisans differ from non-partisan voters by being more inclined to value product over market orientation. Evidence from two mass sample surveys of the British public (both conducted online by YouGov) demonstrates important heterogeneity within the electorate, casts doubt on the core assumptions underlying some political marketing arguments and raises broader questions about what voters are looking for in a party.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)89-104
Number of pages16
JournalParty Politics
Volume20
Issue number1
Early online date22 Feb 2012
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2014

Fingerprint

marketing
market orientation
evidence
Values

Cite this

Giving voters what they want? Party orientation perceptions and preferences in the British electorate. / Johns, Robert A.; Brandenburg, Heinz.

In: Party Politics, Vol. 20, No. 1, 01.2014, p. 89-104.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Johns, Robert A. ; Brandenburg, Heinz. / Giving voters what they want? Party orientation perceptions and preferences in the British electorate. In: Party Politics. 2014 ; Vol. 20, No. 1. pp. 89-104.
@article{d702c123c5384bc6ab7cb93a91cbf378,
title = "Giving voters what they want?: Party orientation perceptions and preferences in the British electorate",
abstract = "Some of the most important propositions in the political marketing literature hinge on assumptions about the electorate. In particular, voters are presumed to react in different ways to different orientations or postures. Yet there are theoretical reasons for questioning some of these assumptions, and certainly they have seldom been empirically tested. Here, we focus on one prominent example of political marketing research: Lees-Marshment’s orientations’ model. We investigate how the public reacts to product and market orientation, whether they see a trade-off between the two (a point in dispute among political marketing scholars), and whether partisans differ from non-partisan voters by being more inclined to value product over market orientation. Evidence from two mass sample surveys of the British public (both conducted online by YouGov) demonstrates important heterogeneity within the electorate, casts doubt on the core assumptions underlying some political marketing arguments and raises broader questions about what voters are looking for in a party.",
author = "Johns, {Robert A.} and Heinz Brandenburg",
note = "Published online before print February 22, 2012, doi: 10.1177/1354068811436040 Party Politics February 22, 2012 1354068811436040 Funding: We are grateful to Research & Innovation at the University of Strathclyde for funding the first survey reported here and to the British Election Study team for fielding the second survey via their NSF-funded Continuous Monitoring Survey. Thanks to Joe Twyman and Kate Davies at YouGov for their help and support during the data collection process. Previous versions of this research were presented at a Greater Glasgow Politics Group seminar (February 2009), at the inaugural conference of the University of Strathclyde’s Centre for Elections and Representation Studies (March 2009) and at a Political Marketing Group panel at the annual meeting of the Political Studies Association in Edinburgh (March 2010). We thank participants at all three events for their helpful comments and suggestions. We also thank anonymous reviewers of this and earlier drafts of the paper.",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1354068811436040",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "89--104",
journal = "Party Politics",
issn = "1354-0688",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Giving voters what they want?

T2 - Party orientation perceptions and preferences in the British electorate

AU - Johns, Robert A.

AU - Brandenburg, Heinz

N1 - Published online before print February 22, 2012, doi: 10.1177/1354068811436040 Party Politics February 22, 2012 1354068811436040 Funding: We are grateful to Research & Innovation at the University of Strathclyde for funding the first survey reported here and to the British Election Study team for fielding the second survey via their NSF-funded Continuous Monitoring Survey. Thanks to Joe Twyman and Kate Davies at YouGov for their help and support during the data collection process. Previous versions of this research were presented at a Greater Glasgow Politics Group seminar (February 2009), at the inaugural conference of the University of Strathclyde’s Centre for Elections and Representation Studies (March 2009) and at a Political Marketing Group panel at the annual meeting of the Political Studies Association in Edinburgh (March 2010). We thank participants at all three events for their helpful comments and suggestions. We also thank anonymous reviewers of this and earlier drafts of the paper.

PY - 2014/1

Y1 - 2014/1

N2 - Some of the most important propositions in the political marketing literature hinge on assumptions about the electorate. In particular, voters are presumed to react in different ways to different orientations or postures. Yet there are theoretical reasons for questioning some of these assumptions, and certainly they have seldom been empirically tested. Here, we focus on one prominent example of political marketing research: Lees-Marshment’s orientations’ model. We investigate how the public reacts to product and market orientation, whether they see a trade-off between the two (a point in dispute among political marketing scholars), and whether partisans differ from non-partisan voters by being more inclined to value product over market orientation. Evidence from two mass sample surveys of the British public (both conducted online by YouGov) demonstrates important heterogeneity within the electorate, casts doubt on the core assumptions underlying some political marketing arguments and raises broader questions about what voters are looking for in a party.

AB - Some of the most important propositions in the political marketing literature hinge on assumptions about the electorate. In particular, voters are presumed to react in different ways to different orientations or postures. Yet there are theoretical reasons for questioning some of these assumptions, and certainly they have seldom been empirically tested. Here, we focus on one prominent example of political marketing research: Lees-Marshment’s orientations’ model. We investigate how the public reacts to product and market orientation, whether they see a trade-off between the two (a point in dispute among political marketing scholars), and whether partisans differ from non-partisan voters by being more inclined to value product over market orientation. Evidence from two mass sample surveys of the British public (both conducted online by YouGov) demonstrates important heterogeneity within the electorate, casts doubt on the core assumptions underlying some political marketing arguments and raises broader questions about what voters are looking for in a party.

U2 - 10.1177/1354068811436040

DO - 10.1177/1354068811436040

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 89

EP - 104

JO - Party Politics

JF - Party Politics

SN - 1354-0688

IS - 1

ER -