Gleaning as a foraging strategy in Natterer's bat Myotis nattereri

Susan Swift, Paul Adrian Racey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

60 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Natterer's bats, Myotis nattereri, continued to emit echolocation calls while gleaning non-flying arthropods, and made little use of prey-generated sound as a cue to locate them. Feeding buzzes were recorded during most attacks. In contrast, brown long-eared bats, Plecotus auritus, in parallel experiments, stopped echolocating during the hovering phase of gleaning attacks, did not emit feeding buzzes and used prey-generated sound as a cue to find food. In uncluttered foraging situations, M. nattereri were able to locate prey by echolocation alone, but in clutter they may have combined it with associative learning, and may also have gleaned prey after being attracted to food sources by feeding buzzes from conspecifics. Both in a flight room and in the wild, Natterer's bats foraged using a sequence of low searching flight, hovering, capture using the interfemoral membrane and prey consumption at a perch or on the wing. They also landed and pursued prey by quadrupedal locomotion. Their diet consisted mainly of medium-sized (5-15 mm body length) arthropods, particularly dung-flies, spiders, beetles and harvestmen, active on plant surfaces at night, some of which could only have been captured by gleaning. Moths were eaten in relatively small quantities, suggesting that the bats were unable to hear their fluttering sounds or that tympanate moth species could detect the bats' approach and take avoiding action. In the same area, moths formed the major component of the diet of P. auritus, reflecting the different foraging techniques of the two bat species.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)408-516
Number of pages108
JournalBehavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
Volume52
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2002

Keywords

  • gleaning
  • echolocation
  • diet
  • interfemoral membrane
  • LONG-EARED BATS
  • PLECOTUS-AURITUS
  • INSECTIVOROUS BATS
  • PREY DETECTION
  • BEHAVIOR
  • ECHOLOCATION
  • HEARING
  • VESPERTILIONIDAE
  • EMARGINATUS
  • CHIROPTERA

Cite this

Gleaning as a foraging strategy in Natterer's bat Myotis nattereri. / Swift, Susan; Racey, Paul Adrian.

In: Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, Vol. 52, 2002, p. 408-516.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Swift, Susan ; Racey, Paul Adrian. / Gleaning as a foraging strategy in Natterer's bat Myotis nattereri. In: Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 2002 ; Vol. 52. pp. 408-516.
@article{e1ce622432cf4daea5a0a4b9407edc2e,
title = "Gleaning as a foraging strategy in Natterer's bat Myotis nattereri",
abstract = "Natterer's bats, Myotis nattereri, continued to emit echolocation calls while gleaning non-flying arthropods, and made little use of prey-generated sound as a cue to locate them. Feeding buzzes were recorded during most attacks. In contrast, brown long-eared bats, Plecotus auritus, in parallel experiments, stopped echolocating during the hovering phase of gleaning attacks, did not emit feeding buzzes and used prey-generated sound as a cue to find food. In uncluttered foraging situations, M. nattereri were able to locate prey by echolocation alone, but in clutter they may have combined it with associative learning, and may also have gleaned prey after being attracted to food sources by feeding buzzes from conspecifics. Both in a flight room and in the wild, Natterer's bats foraged using a sequence of low searching flight, hovering, capture using the interfemoral membrane and prey consumption at a perch or on the wing. They also landed and pursued prey by quadrupedal locomotion. Their diet consisted mainly of medium-sized (5-15 mm body length) arthropods, particularly dung-flies, spiders, beetles and harvestmen, active on plant surfaces at night, some of which could only have been captured by gleaning. Moths were eaten in relatively small quantities, suggesting that the bats were unable to hear their fluttering sounds or that tympanate moth species could detect the bats' approach and take avoiding action. In the same area, moths formed the major component of the diet of P. auritus, reflecting the different foraging techniques of the two bat species.",
keywords = "gleaning, echolocation, diet, interfemoral membrane, LONG-EARED BATS, PLECOTUS-AURITUS, INSECTIVOROUS BATS, PREY DETECTION, BEHAVIOR, ECHOLOCATION, HEARING, VESPERTILIONIDAE, EMARGINATUS, CHIROPTERA",
author = "Susan Swift and Racey, {Paul Adrian}",
year = "2002",
doi = "10.1007/s00265-002-0531-x",
language = "English",
volume = "52",
pages = "408--516",
journal = "Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology",
issn = "0340-5443",
publisher = "Springer",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gleaning as a foraging strategy in Natterer's bat Myotis nattereri

AU - Swift, Susan

AU - Racey, Paul Adrian

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - Natterer's bats, Myotis nattereri, continued to emit echolocation calls while gleaning non-flying arthropods, and made little use of prey-generated sound as a cue to locate them. Feeding buzzes were recorded during most attacks. In contrast, brown long-eared bats, Plecotus auritus, in parallel experiments, stopped echolocating during the hovering phase of gleaning attacks, did not emit feeding buzzes and used prey-generated sound as a cue to find food. In uncluttered foraging situations, M. nattereri were able to locate prey by echolocation alone, but in clutter they may have combined it with associative learning, and may also have gleaned prey after being attracted to food sources by feeding buzzes from conspecifics. Both in a flight room and in the wild, Natterer's bats foraged using a sequence of low searching flight, hovering, capture using the interfemoral membrane and prey consumption at a perch or on the wing. They also landed and pursued prey by quadrupedal locomotion. Their diet consisted mainly of medium-sized (5-15 mm body length) arthropods, particularly dung-flies, spiders, beetles and harvestmen, active on plant surfaces at night, some of which could only have been captured by gleaning. Moths were eaten in relatively small quantities, suggesting that the bats were unable to hear their fluttering sounds or that tympanate moth species could detect the bats' approach and take avoiding action. In the same area, moths formed the major component of the diet of P. auritus, reflecting the different foraging techniques of the two bat species.

AB - Natterer's bats, Myotis nattereri, continued to emit echolocation calls while gleaning non-flying arthropods, and made little use of prey-generated sound as a cue to locate them. Feeding buzzes were recorded during most attacks. In contrast, brown long-eared bats, Plecotus auritus, in parallel experiments, stopped echolocating during the hovering phase of gleaning attacks, did not emit feeding buzzes and used prey-generated sound as a cue to find food. In uncluttered foraging situations, M. nattereri were able to locate prey by echolocation alone, but in clutter they may have combined it with associative learning, and may also have gleaned prey after being attracted to food sources by feeding buzzes from conspecifics. Both in a flight room and in the wild, Natterer's bats foraged using a sequence of low searching flight, hovering, capture using the interfemoral membrane and prey consumption at a perch or on the wing. They also landed and pursued prey by quadrupedal locomotion. Their diet consisted mainly of medium-sized (5-15 mm body length) arthropods, particularly dung-flies, spiders, beetles and harvestmen, active on plant surfaces at night, some of which could only have been captured by gleaning. Moths were eaten in relatively small quantities, suggesting that the bats were unable to hear their fluttering sounds or that tympanate moth species could detect the bats' approach and take avoiding action. In the same area, moths formed the major component of the diet of P. auritus, reflecting the different foraging techniques of the two bat species.

KW - gleaning

KW - echolocation

KW - diet

KW - interfemoral membrane

KW - LONG-EARED BATS

KW - PLECOTUS-AURITUS

KW - INSECTIVOROUS BATS

KW - PREY DETECTION

KW - BEHAVIOR

KW - ECHOLOCATION

KW - HEARING

KW - VESPERTILIONIDAE

KW - EMARGINATUS

KW - CHIROPTERA

U2 - 10.1007/s00265-002-0531-x

DO - 10.1007/s00265-002-0531-x

M3 - Article

VL - 52

SP - 408

EP - 516

JO - Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

JF - Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

SN - 0340-5443

ER -