Global variations in the uptake of single embryo transfer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

92 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single embryo transfer (SET) is the most effective way of reducing multiple pregnancy rates associated with assisted reproductive technology (ART). Despite published evidence suggesting that the judicious use of elective SET can lead to near-elimination of multiples without compromising cumulative live birth rates, the uptake of this strategy has been variable.

METHODS: Medline, EMBASE and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (1978–2010) were searched using appropriate MeSH headings. Leading fertility journals along with appropriate cross references were hand searched and information retrieved from national ART registers and websites of national fertility societies in order to determine current rates of SET. We explored social, economic and clinical factors determining the uptake of SET.

RESULTS: It was not possible to distinguish elective from non-elective SET from national ART reports. Data from 31 countries suggest that there has been a gradual increase in SET rates over a 3 year period (2003–2005) but major geographical differences were noted. SET rates are highest in Sweden (69.4%) but are as low as 2.8% in the USA. Access to public funding for ART, availability of good cryopreservation facilities and legislation appear to be the most important reasons favouring the uptake of SET. Personal choice plays a significant role as many subfertile couples have a strong preference for twins. Awareness that double embryo transfer (DET) increases live birth per fresh treatment cycle, inability to accurately identify women at high risk for twins and limitations of existing embryos selection criteria are barriers to a wider acceptance of SET.

CONCLUSIONS: The current variation in the uptake of elective SET is likely to persist until there are major changes in the way ART is viewed, funded and legislated.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)107-120
Number of pages14
JournalHuman Reproduction Update
Volume17
Issue number1
Early online date15 Jul 2010
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Fingerprint

Single Embryo Transfer
Assisted Reproductive Techniques
Live Birth
Fertility
Medical Subject Headings
Multiple Pregnancy
Birth Rate
Embryo Transfer
Cryopreservation
Pregnancy Rate
Legislation
Sweden
Patient Selection
Embryonic Structures

Keywords

  • single embryo transfer
  • eSET
  • global variation
  • barriers
  • ART

Cite this

Global variations in the uptake of single embryo transfer. / Maheshwari, Abha; Griffiths, Siriol; Bhattacharya, Siladitya.

In: Human Reproduction Update, Vol. 17, No. 1, 2010, p. 107-120.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{07b4c95181a8491ebfc31ddf05983428,
title = "Global variations in the uptake of single embryo transfer",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Single embryo transfer (SET) is the most effective way of reducing multiple pregnancy rates associated with assisted reproductive technology (ART). Despite published evidence suggesting that the judicious use of elective SET can lead to near-elimination of multiples without compromising cumulative live birth rates, the uptake of this strategy has been variable. METHODS: Medline, EMBASE and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (1978–2010) were searched using appropriate MeSH headings. Leading fertility journals along with appropriate cross references were hand searched and information retrieved from national ART registers and websites of national fertility societies in order to determine current rates of SET. We explored social, economic and clinical factors determining the uptake of SET. RESULTS: It was not possible to distinguish elective from non-elective SET from national ART reports. Data from 31 countries suggest that there has been a gradual increase in SET rates over a 3 year period (2003–2005) but major geographical differences were noted. SET rates are highest in Sweden (69.4{\%}) but are as low as 2.8{\%} in the USA. Access to public funding for ART, availability of good cryopreservation facilities and legislation appear to be the most important reasons favouring the uptake of SET. Personal choice plays a significant role as many subfertile couples have a strong preference for twins. Awareness that double embryo transfer (DET) increases live birth per fresh treatment cycle, inability to accurately identify women at high risk for twins and limitations of existing embryos selection criteria are barriers to a wider acceptance of SET. CONCLUSIONS: The current variation in the uptake of elective SET is likely to persist until there are major changes in the way ART is viewed, funded and legislated.",
keywords = "single embryo transfer , eSET, global variation , barriers , ART",
author = "Abha Maheshwari and Siriol Griffiths and Siladitya Bhattacharya",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1093/humupd/dmq028",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "107--120",
journal = "Human Reproduction Update",
issn = "1355-4786",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Global variations in the uptake of single embryo transfer

AU - Maheshwari, Abha

AU - Griffiths, Siriol

AU - Bhattacharya, Siladitya

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - BACKGROUND: Single embryo transfer (SET) is the most effective way of reducing multiple pregnancy rates associated with assisted reproductive technology (ART). Despite published evidence suggesting that the judicious use of elective SET can lead to near-elimination of multiples without compromising cumulative live birth rates, the uptake of this strategy has been variable. METHODS: Medline, EMBASE and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (1978–2010) were searched using appropriate MeSH headings. Leading fertility journals along with appropriate cross references were hand searched and information retrieved from national ART registers and websites of national fertility societies in order to determine current rates of SET. We explored social, economic and clinical factors determining the uptake of SET. RESULTS: It was not possible to distinguish elective from non-elective SET from national ART reports. Data from 31 countries suggest that there has been a gradual increase in SET rates over a 3 year period (2003–2005) but major geographical differences were noted. SET rates are highest in Sweden (69.4%) but are as low as 2.8% in the USA. Access to public funding for ART, availability of good cryopreservation facilities and legislation appear to be the most important reasons favouring the uptake of SET. Personal choice plays a significant role as many subfertile couples have a strong preference for twins. Awareness that double embryo transfer (DET) increases live birth per fresh treatment cycle, inability to accurately identify women at high risk for twins and limitations of existing embryos selection criteria are barriers to a wider acceptance of SET. CONCLUSIONS: The current variation in the uptake of elective SET is likely to persist until there are major changes in the way ART is viewed, funded and legislated.

AB - BACKGROUND: Single embryo transfer (SET) is the most effective way of reducing multiple pregnancy rates associated with assisted reproductive technology (ART). Despite published evidence suggesting that the judicious use of elective SET can lead to near-elimination of multiples without compromising cumulative live birth rates, the uptake of this strategy has been variable. METHODS: Medline, EMBASE and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (1978–2010) were searched using appropriate MeSH headings. Leading fertility journals along with appropriate cross references were hand searched and information retrieved from national ART registers and websites of national fertility societies in order to determine current rates of SET. We explored social, economic and clinical factors determining the uptake of SET. RESULTS: It was not possible to distinguish elective from non-elective SET from national ART reports. Data from 31 countries suggest that there has been a gradual increase in SET rates over a 3 year period (2003–2005) but major geographical differences were noted. SET rates are highest in Sweden (69.4%) but are as low as 2.8% in the USA. Access to public funding for ART, availability of good cryopreservation facilities and legislation appear to be the most important reasons favouring the uptake of SET. Personal choice plays a significant role as many subfertile couples have a strong preference for twins. Awareness that double embryo transfer (DET) increases live birth per fresh treatment cycle, inability to accurately identify women at high risk for twins and limitations of existing embryos selection criteria are barriers to a wider acceptance of SET. CONCLUSIONS: The current variation in the uptake of elective SET is likely to persist until there are major changes in the way ART is viewed, funded and legislated.

KW - single embryo transfer

KW - eSET

KW - global variation

KW - barriers

KW - ART

U2 - 10.1093/humupd/dmq028

DO - 10.1093/humupd/dmq028

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 107

EP - 120

JO - Human Reproduction Update

JF - Human Reproduction Update

SN - 1355-4786

IS - 1

ER -