Gloves and dermal exposure to chemicals: proposals for evaluating workplace effectiveness

John Cherrie, Sean Semple, D. Brouwer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There are standardized laboratory tests for chemical protective gloves that provide estimates of breakthrough time and steady-state permeation flux. However, there is evidence to suggest that these tests may not be completely relevant to glove usage in the workplace. There is no consensus about how glove workplace effectiveness should be assessed, although a few studies have attempted to measure the effectiveness of chemical protective gloves. We have used a conceptual model of dermal exposure to help analyse how workers' skin may become exposed while wearing gloves, and propose a new glove workplace protection factor (PFgloves), which is based on the ratio of the estimated uptake of chemicals through the hands without gloves to the uptake through the hands while wearing protective gloves. Mathematical simulations demonstrate that glove protection factor is unlikely to be constant for a glove type, but will be strongly influenced by the work situation and the duration of the exposure. This has important consequences for the selection of protective gloves.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)607-615
Number of pages8
JournalAnnals of Occupational Hygiene
Volume48
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2004

Keywords

  • chemical protective gloves
  • workplace protection factor (WPF)
  • MODEL

Cite this

Gloves and dermal exposure to chemicals: proposals for evaluating workplace effectiveness. / Cherrie, John; Semple, Sean; Brouwer, D.

In: Annals of Occupational Hygiene, Vol. 48, 2004, p. 607-615.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cherrie, John ; Semple, Sean ; Brouwer, D. / Gloves and dermal exposure to chemicals: proposals for evaluating workplace effectiveness. In: Annals of Occupational Hygiene. 2004 ; Vol. 48. pp. 607-615.
@article{bce80a72f7ca4c28b989404b61de6b48,
title = "Gloves and dermal exposure to chemicals: proposals for evaluating workplace effectiveness",
abstract = "There are standardized laboratory tests for chemical protective gloves that provide estimates of breakthrough time and steady-state permeation flux. However, there is evidence to suggest that these tests may not be completely relevant to glove usage in the workplace. There is no consensus about how glove workplace effectiveness should be assessed, although a few studies have attempted to measure the effectiveness of chemical protective gloves. We have used a conceptual model of dermal exposure to help analyse how workers' skin may become exposed while wearing gloves, and propose a new glove workplace protection factor (PFgloves), which is based on the ratio of the estimated uptake of chemicals through the hands without gloves to the uptake through the hands while wearing protective gloves. Mathematical simulations demonstrate that glove protection factor is unlikely to be constant for a glove type, but will be strongly influenced by the work situation and the duration of the exposure. This has important consequences for the selection of protective gloves.",
keywords = "chemical protective gloves, workplace protection factor (WPF), MODEL",
author = "John Cherrie and Sean Semple and D. Brouwer",
year = "2004",
doi = "10.1093/annhyg/meh060",
language = "English",
volume = "48",
pages = "607--615",
journal = "Annals of Occupational Hygiene",
issn = "0003-4878",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gloves and dermal exposure to chemicals: proposals for evaluating workplace effectiveness

AU - Cherrie, John

AU - Semple, Sean

AU - Brouwer, D.

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - There are standardized laboratory tests for chemical protective gloves that provide estimates of breakthrough time and steady-state permeation flux. However, there is evidence to suggest that these tests may not be completely relevant to glove usage in the workplace. There is no consensus about how glove workplace effectiveness should be assessed, although a few studies have attempted to measure the effectiveness of chemical protective gloves. We have used a conceptual model of dermal exposure to help analyse how workers' skin may become exposed while wearing gloves, and propose a new glove workplace protection factor (PFgloves), which is based on the ratio of the estimated uptake of chemicals through the hands without gloves to the uptake through the hands while wearing protective gloves. Mathematical simulations demonstrate that glove protection factor is unlikely to be constant for a glove type, but will be strongly influenced by the work situation and the duration of the exposure. This has important consequences for the selection of protective gloves.

AB - There are standardized laboratory tests for chemical protective gloves that provide estimates of breakthrough time and steady-state permeation flux. However, there is evidence to suggest that these tests may not be completely relevant to glove usage in the workplace. There is no consensus about how glove workplace effectiveness should be assessed, although a few studies have attempted to measure the effectiveness of chemical protective gloves. We have used a conceptual model of dermal exposure to help analyse how workers' skin may become exposed while wearing gloves, and propose a new glove workplace protection factor (PFgloves), which is based on the ratio of the estimated uptake of chemicals through the hands without gloves to the uptake through the hands while wearing protective gloves. Mathematical simulations demonstrate that glove protection factor is unlikely to be constant for a glove type, but will be strongly influenced by the work situation and the duration of the exposure. This has important consequences for the selection of protective gloves.

KW - chemical protective gloves

KW - workplace protection factor (WPF)

KW - MODEL

U2 - 10.1093/annhyg/meh060

DO - 10.1093/annhyg/meh060

M3 - Article

VL - 48

SP - 607

EP - 615

JO - Annals of Occupational Hygiene

JF - Annals of Occupational Hygiene

SN - 0003-4878

ER -