Gone but not forgotten: The transient nature of retrieval-induced forgetting.

M. D. MacLeod, C Neil MacRae

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

145 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recent research has demonstrated that the act of remembering can prompt temporary forgetting or, more specifically, the inhibition of particular items in memory. Extending work of this kind, the present research investigated some possible boundary conditions of retrieval-induced forgetting. As expected, a critical determinant of temporary forgetting was the interval between guided retrieval practice and a final recall test. When these two phases were separated by 24 hr, retrieval-induced forgetting failed to emerge. When they occurred in the same testing session, however, retrieval practice prompted the inhibition of related items in memory (i.e., Experiment 1). A delay of 24 hr between the encoding of material and guided retrieval practice reduced but did not eliminate retrieval-induced forgetting (i.e., Experiment 2). These findings are considered in the wider context of adaptive forgetting.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)148-152
Number of pages4
JournalPsychological Science
Volume12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2001

Keywords

  • MEMORY
  • COGNITION

Cite this

Gone but not forgotten: The transient nature of retrieval-induced forgetting. / MacLeod, M. D.; MacRae, C Neil.

In: Psychological Science, Vol. 12, 2001, p. 148-152.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6faf0caf563e4d2c856124c6ce5830e5,
title = "Gone but not forgotten: The transient nature of retrieval-induced forgetting.",
abstract = "Recent research has demonstrated that the act of remembering can prompt temporary forgetting or, more specifically, the inhibition of particular items in memory. Extending work of this kind, the present research investigated some possible boundary conditions of retrieval-induced forgetting. As expected, a critical determinant of temporary forgetting was the interval between guided retrieval practice and a final recall test. When these two phases were separated by 24 hr, retrieval-induced forgetting failed to emerge. When they occurred in the same testing session, however, retrieval practice prompted the inhibition of related items in memory (i.e., Experiment 1). A delay of 24 hr between the encoding of material and guided retrieval practice reduced but did not eliminate retrieval-induced forgetting (i.e., Experiment 2). These findings are considered in the wider context of adaptive forgetting.",
keywords = "MEMORY, COGNITION",
author = "MacLeod, {M. D.} and MacRae, {C Neil}",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1111/1467-9280.00325",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "148--152",
journal = "Psychological Science",
issn = "0956-7976",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gone but not forgotten: The transient nature of retrieval-induced forgetting.

AU - MacLeod, M. D.

AU - MacRae, C Neil

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - Recent research has demonstrated that the act of remembering can prompt temporary forgetting or, more specifically, the inhibition of particular items in memory. Extending work of this kind, the present research investigated some possible boundary conditions of retrieval-induced forgetting. As expected, a critical determinant of temporary forgetting was the interval between guided retrieval practice and a final recall test. When these two phases were separated by 24 hr, retrieval-induced forgetting failed to emerge. When they occurred in the same testing session, however, retrieval practice prompted the inhibition of related items in memory (i.e., Experiment 1). A delay of 24 hr between the encoding of material and guided retrieval practice reduced but did not eliminate retrieval-induced forgetting (i.e., Experiment 2). These findings are considered in the wider context of adaptive forgetting.

AB - Recent research has demonstrated that the act of remembering can prompt temporary forgetting or, more specifically, the inhibition of particular items in memory. Extending work of this kind, the present research investigated some possible boundary conditions of retrieval-induced forgetting. As expected, a critical determinant of temporary forgetting was the interval between guided retrieval practice and a final recall test. When these two phases were separated by 24 hr, retrieval-induced forgetting failed to emerge. When they occurred in the same testing session, however, retrieval practice prompted the inhibition of related items in memory (i.e., Experiment 1). A delay of 24 hr between the encoding of material and guided retrieval practice reduced but did not eliminate retrieval-induced forgetting (i.e., Experiment 2). These findings are considered in the wider context of adaptive forgetting.

KW - MEMORY

KW - COGNITION

U2 - 10.1111/1467-9280.00325

DO - 10.1111/1467-9280.00325

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 148

EP - 152

JO - Psychological Science

JF - Psychological Science

SN - 0956-7976

ER -