GPs' attitudes to discussing prognosis in severe COPD: an Auckland (NZ) to London (UK) comparison

P Mulcahy, S Buetow, L Osman, G Coster, Y Bray, P White, H Elkington

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    23 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Background. A palliative care approach, as used routinely in cancer, is also valid for incurable chronic illnesses such as chronic obstructive airways disease (COPD). However, a London study recently reported that general practitioners (GPs), who provide most end-stage care for COPD patients, do not routinely discuss prognosis with these patients.

    Objective. To compare the views of GPs in Auckland, New Zealand (NZ) and London, United Kingdom (UK) on discussions of prognosis in severe COPD.

    Method. A postal questionnaire of 509 randomly selected Auckland GPs. The questionnaire was almost identical to the UK one. Comparisons were made with aggregated statistics for the London sample as reported in published findings and personal communication with the London authors.

    Results. The Auckland response rate of 56% was similar to that of the London study (55%). Most GPs in both samples stated that discussions on prognosis are necessary in severe COPD and that GPs have an important role in discussing prognosis. Smaller proportions of both samples reported usually having such discussions, although Auckland GPs (55.6%) were more likely to hold the discussions than were London counterparts (40.7%). Auckland GPs were also more likely to agree that patients with severe COPD want to discuss prognosis and that patients value these discussions. One-third of the Auckland GPs and nearly half the London GPs believe that some patients with severe COPD who want to discuss prognosis are not given the opportunity to do so.

    Conclusion. Auckland GPs are more open than their London counterparts to discussing prognosis in severe COPD. There is increased scope for GPs in London to discuss prognosis with these patients. Further support is needed for GPs in both countries who do not routinely discuss prognosis in severe COPD, but consider it is necessary to have these discussions.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)538-540
    Number of pages3
    JournalFamily Practice
    Volume22
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2005

    Keywords

    • chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
    • communication
    • comparison
    • palliative care
    • prognosis

    Cite this

    Mulcahy, P., Buetow, S., Osman, L., Coster, G., Bray, Y., White, P., & Elkington, H. (2005). GPs' attitudes to discussing prognosis in severe COPD: an Auckland (NZ) to London (UK) comparison. Family Practice, 22, 538-540. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmi052

    GPs' attitudes to discussing prognosis in severe COPD: an Auckland (NZ) to London (UK) comparison. / Mulcahy, P ; Buetow, S ; Osman, L ; Coster, G ; Bray, Y ; White, P ; Elkington, H .

    In: Family Practice, Vol. 22, 2005, p. 538-540.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Mulcahy, P, Buetow, S, Osman, L, Coster, G, Bray, Y, White, P & Elkington, H 2005, 'GPs' attitudes to discussing prognosis in severe COPD: an Auckland (NZ) to London (UK) comparison', Family Practice, vol. 22, pp. 538-540. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmi052
    Mulcahy, P ; Buetow, S ; Osman, L ; Coster, G ; Bray, Y ; White, P ; Elkington, H . / GPs' attitudes to discussing prognosis in severe COPD: an Auckland (NZ) to London (UK) comparison. In: Family Practice. 2005 ; Vol. 22. pp. 538-540.
    @article{5758a576175f4813afe1a084555525e9,
    title = "GPs' attitudes to discussing prognosis in severe COPD: an Auckland (NZ) to London (UK) comparison",
    abstract = "Background. A palliative care approach, as used routinely in cancer, is also valid for incurable chronic illnesses such as chronic obstructive airways disease (COPD). However, a London study recently reported that general practitioners (GPs), who provide most end-stage care for COPD patients, do not routinely discuss prognosis with these patients.Objective. To compare the views of GPs in Auckland, New Zealand (NZ) and London, United Kingdom (UK) on discussions of prognosis in severe COPD.Method. A postal questionnaire of 509 randomly selected Auckland GPs. The questionnaire was almost identical to the UK one. Comparisons were made with aggregated statistics for the London sample as reported in published findings and personal communication with the London authors.Results. The Auckland response rate of 56{\%} was similar to that of the London study (55{\%}). Most GPs in both samples stated that discussions on prognosis are necessary in severe COPD and that GPs have an important role in discussing prognosis. Smaller proportions of both samples reported usually having such discussions, although Auckland GPs (55.6{\%}) were more likely to hold the discussions than were London counterparts (40.7{\%}). Auckland GPs were also more likely to agree that patients with severe COPD want to discuss prognosis and that patients value these discussions. One-third of the Auckland GPs and nearly half the London GPs believe that some patients with severe COPD who want to discuss prognosis are not given the opportunity to do so.Conclusion. Auckland GPs are more open than their London counterparts to discussing prognosis in severe COPD. There is increased scope for GPs in London to discuss prognosis with these patients. Further support is needed for GPs in both countries who do not routinely discuss prognosis in severe COPD, but consider it is necessary to have these discussions.",
    keywords = "chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, communication, comparison, palliative care, prognosis",
    author = "P Mulcahy and S Buetow and L Osman and G Coster and Y Bray and P White and H Elkington",
    year = "2005",
    doi = "10.1093/fampra/cmi052",
    language = "English",
    volume = "22",
    pages = "538--540",
    journal = "Family Practice",
    issn = "0263-2136",
    publisher = "Oxford University Press",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - GPs' attitudes to discussing prognosis in severe COPD: an Auckland (NZ) to London (UK) comparison

    AU - Mulcahy, P

    AU - Buetow, S

    AU - Osman, L

    AU - Coster, G

    AU - Bray, Y

    AU - White, P

    AU - Elkington, H

    PY - 2005

    Y1 - 2005

    N2 - Background. A palliative care approach, as used routinely in cancer, is also valid for incurable chronic illnesses such as chronic obstructive airways disease (COPD). However, a London study recently reported that general practitioners (GPs), who provide most end-stage care for COPD patients, do not routinely discuss prognosis with these patients.Objective. To compare the views of GPs in Auckland, New Zealand (NZ) and London, United Kingdom (UK) on discussions of prognosis in severe COPD.Method. A postal questionnaire of 509 randomly selected Auckland GPs. The questionnaire was almost identical to the UK one. Comparisons were made with aggregated statistics for the London sample as reported in published findings and personal communication with the London authors.Results. The Auckland response rate of 56% was similar to that of the London study (55%). Most GPs in both samples stated that discussions on prognosis are necessary in severe COPD and that GPs have an important role in discussing prognosis. Smaller proportions of both samples reported usually having such discussions, although Auckland GPs (55.6%) were more likely to hold the discussions than were London counterparts (40.7%). Auckland GPs were also more likely to agree that patients with severe COPD want to discuss prognosis and that patients value these discussions. One-third of the Auckland GPs and nearly half the London GPs believe that some patients with severe COPD who want to discuss prognosis are not given the opportunity to do so.Conclusion. Auckland GPs are more open than their London counterparts to discussing prognosis in severe COPD. There is increased scope for GPs in London to discuss prognosis with these patients. Further support is needed for GPs in both countries who do not routinely discuss prognosis in severe COPD, but consider it is necessary to have these discussions.

    AB - Background. A palliative care approach, as used routinely in cancer, is also valid for incurable chronic illnesses such as chronic obstructive airways disease (COPD). However, a London study recently reported that general practitioners (GPs), who provide most end-stage care for COPD patients, do not routinely discuss prognosis with these patients.Objective. To compare the views of GPs in Auckland, New Zealand (NZ) and London, United Kingdom (UK) on discussions of prognosis in severe COPD.Method. A postal questionnaire of 509 randomly selected Auckland GPs. The questionnaire was almost identical to the UK one. Comparisons were made with aggregated statistics for the London sample as reported in published findings and personal communication with the London authors.Results. The Auckland response rate of 56% was similar to that of the London study (55%). Most GPs in both samples stated that discussions on prognosis are necessary in severe COPD and that GPs have an important role in discussing prognosis. Smaller proportions of both samples reported usually having such discussions, although Auckland GPs (55.6%) were more likely to hold the discussions than were London counterparts (40.7%). Auckland GPs were also more likely to agree that patients with severe COPD want to discuss prognosis and that patients value these discussions. One-third of the Auckland GPs and nearly half the London GPs believe that some patients with severe COPD who want to discuss prognosis are not given the opportunity to do so.Conclusion. Auckland GPs are more open than their London counterparts to discussing prognosis in severe COPD. There is increased scope for GPs in London to discuss prognosis with these patients. Further support is needed for GPs in both countries who do not routinely discuss prognosis in severe COPD, but consider it is necessary to have these discussions.

    KW - chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

    KW - communication

    KW - comparison

    KW - palliative care

    KW - prognosis

    U2 - 10.1093/fampra/cmi052

    DO - 10.1093/fampra/cmi052

    M3 - Article

    VL - 22

    SP - 538

    EP - 540

    JO - Family Practice

    JF - Family Practice

    SN - 0263-2136

    ER -