Graffiti and the Moral Right of Integrity

Marta Iljadica

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Graffiti and street art have, in some cities, become a draw for the local community and visitors alike. This article explores the applicability of the right to object to derogatory treatment (UK) and the prevention of destruction of works of recognised stature (US) to graffiti. It argues that even where permission has been granted by property owners and these creations constitute original artistic works, it would be difficult for authors to avail themselves of moral rights protection when their works are fully or partially destroyed by building owners. Authors are unlikely to succeed because the destruction is unlikely to be "treatment" and because reputation will be difficult to demonstrate. Similar problems arise with demonstrating reputation under the "recognized stature" provision of the Visual Artists Rights Act in the US. Notwithstanding that moral rights seek to recognise the author’s dignity, a concern with respectability makes the preservation of graffiti unlikely.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)266-288
Number of pages23
JournalIntellectual Property Quarterly
Volume3
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

graffiti
integrity
reputation
building owner
visual artist
act
art
community

Keywords

  • Defacement
  • Derogatory treatment
  • Artistic works
  • Integrity right
  • United States

Cite this

Graffiti and the Moral Right of Integrity. / Iljadica, Marta.

In: Intellectual Property Quarterly, Vol. 3, 2015, p. 266-288.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Iljadica, Marta. / Graffiti and the Moral Right of Integrity. In: Intellectual Property Quarterly. 2015 ; Vol. 3. pp. 266-288.
@article{3ac16d72e2f4455787b36f3b79ba0b83,
title = "Graffiti and the Moral Right of Integrity",
abstract = "Graffiti and street art have, in some cities, become a draw for the local community and visitors alike. This article explores the applicability of the right to object to derogatory treatment (UK) and the prevention of destruction of works of recognised stature (US) to graffiti. It argues that even where permission has been granted by property owners and these creations constitute original artistic works, it would be difficult for authors to avail themselves of moral rights protection when their works are fully or partially destroyed by building owners. Authors are unlikely to succeed because the destruction is unlikely to be {"}treatment{"} and because reputation will be difficult to demonstrate. Similar problems arise with demonstrating reputation under the {"}recognized stature{"} provision of the Visual Artists Rights Act in the US. Notwithstanding that moral rights seek to recognise the author’s dignity, a concern with respectability makes the preservation of graffiti unlikely.",
keywords = "Defacement, Derogatory treatment, Artistic works, Integrity right, United States",
author = "Marta Iljadica",
year = "2015",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "266--288",
journal = "Intellectual Property Quarterly",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Graffiti and the Moral Right of Integrity

AU - Iljadica, Marta

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Graffiti and street art have, in some cities, become a draw for the local community and visitors alike. This article explores the applicability of the right to object to derogatory treatment (UK) and the prevention of destruction of works of recognised stature (US) to graffiti. It argues that even where permission has been granted by property owners and these creations constitute original artistic works, it would be difficult for authors to avail themselves of moral rights protection when their works are fully or partially destroyed by building owners. Authors are unlikely to succeed because the destruction is unlikely to be "treatment" and because reputation will be difficult to demonstrate. Similar problems arise with demonstrating reputation under the "recognized stature" provision of the Visual Artists Rights Act in the US. Notwithstanding that moral rights seek to recognise the author’s dignity, a concern with respectability makes the preservation of graffiti unlikely.

AB - Graffiti and street art have, in some cities, become a draw for the local community and visitors alike. This article explores the applicability of the right to object to derogatory treatment (UK) and the prevention of destruction of works of recognised stature (US) to graffiti. It argues that even where permission has been granted by property owners and these creations constitute original artistic works, it would be difficult for authors to avail themselves of moral rights protection when their works are fully or partially destroyed by building owners. Authors are unlikely to succeed because the destruction is unlikely to be "treatment" and because reputation will be difficult to demonstrate. Similar problems arise with demonstrating reputation under the "recognized stature" provision of the Visual Artists Rights Act in the US. Notwithstanding that moral rights seek to recognise the author’s dignity, a concern with respectability makes the preservation of graffiti unlikely.

KW - Defacement

KW - Derogatory treatment

KW - Artistic works

KW - Integrity right

KW - United States

UR - https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2851793

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - 266

EP - 288

JO - Intellectual Property Quarterly

JF - Intellectual Property Quarterly

ER -