Abstract
We examined principles of graded argumentation semantics (independence, anonymity, void precedence, and maximality) to explore if (a) they realistically model human reasoning, (b) graphical representation of arguments facilitates compliance with the principles, (c) there is a positive correlation between compliance with di!erent principles, and (d) this compliance is related to cognitive re"ection, need for cognition and faith in intuition. Our results indicate that there are major di!erences in the compliance with the several argumentation principles studied in this paper. However, compliance with argumentation principles was consistently better and more consistent in the group presented with graphical representations. Moreover, cognitive re"ection correlated with compliance to some principles, but only in the graph group.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | AAMAS '22 |
Subtitle of host publication | Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems |
Publisher | ACM |
Pages | 1319–1327 |
Number of pages | 9 |
ISBN (Print) | 9781450392136 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 9 May 2022 |
Event | International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 2022 - Online Duration: 9 May 2022 → 13 May 2022 https://aamas2022-conference.auckland.ac.nz/ |
Conference
Conference | International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 2022 |
---|---|
Abbreviated title | AAMAS 2022 |
Period | 9/05/22 → 13/05/22 |
Internet address |
Keywords
- Argumentation
- Human Reasoning
- Principles
- Graded semantics