Groundwater surface mapping informs sources of catchment baseflow

J. F. Costelloe*, T. J. Peterson, K. Halbert, A. W. Western, J. J. Mcdonnell

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Groundwater discharge is a major contributor to stream baseflow. Quantifying this flux is difficult, despite its considerable importance to water resource management and evaluation of the effects of groundwater extraction on streamflow. It is important to be able to differentiate between contributions to streamflow from regional groundwater discharge (more susceptible to groundwater extraction) compared to interflow processes (arguably less susceptible to groundwater extraction). Here we explore the use of groundwater surface mapping as an independent data set to constrain estimates of groundwater discharge to streamflow using traditional digital filter and tracer techniques. We developed groundwater surfaces from 88 monitoring bores using Kriging with external drift and for a subset of 33 bores with shallow screen depths. Baseflow estimates at the catchment outlet were made using the Eckhardt digital filter approach and tracer data mixing analysis using major ion signatures. Our groundwater mapping approach yielded two measures (percentage area intersecting the land surface and monthly change in saturated volume) that indicated that digital filter-derived baseflow significantly exceeded probable groundwater discharge during most months. Tracer analysis was not able to resolve contributions from ungauged tributary flows (sourced from either shallow flow paths, i.e. interflow and perched aquifer discharge, or regional groundwater discharge) and regional groundwater. Groundwater mapping was able to identify ungauged sub-catchments where regional groundwater discharge was too deep to contribute to tributary flow and thus where shallow flow paths dominated the tributary flow. Our results suggest that kriged groundwater surfaces provide a useful, empirical and independent data set for investigating sources of fluxes contributing to baseflow and identifying periods where baseflow analysis may overestimate groundwater discharge to streamflow.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1599-1613
Number of pages15
JournalHydrology and Earth System Sciences
Volume19
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 7 Apr 2015

Fingerprint

baseflow
catchment
groundwater
streamflow
tributary
tracer
filter
kriging
land surface
aquifer

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Water Science and Technology

Cite this

Costelloe, J. F., Peterson, T. J., Halbert, K., Western, A. W., & Mcdonnell, J. J. (2015). Groundwater surface mapping informs sources of catchment baseflow. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 19(4), 1599-1613. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-1599-2015

Groundwater surface mapping informs sources of catchment baseflow. / Costelloe, J. F.; Peterson, T. J.; Halbert, K.; Western, A. W.; Mcdonnell, J. J.

In: Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, Vol. 19, No. 4, 07.04.2015, p. 1599-1613.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Costelloe, JF, Peterson, TJ, Halbert, K, Western, AW & Mcdonnell, JJ 2015, 'Groundwater surface mapping informs sources of catchment baseflow', Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 1599-1613. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-1599-2015
Costelloe JF, Peterson TJ, Halbert K, Western AW, Mcdonnell JJ. Groundwater surface mapping informs sources of catchment baseflow. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences. 2015 Apr 7;19(4):1599-1613. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-1599-2015
Costelloe, J. F. ; Peterson, T. J. ; Halbert, K. ; Western, A. W. ; Mcdonnell, J. J. / Groundwater surface mapping informs sources of catchment baseflow. In: Hydrology and Earth System Sciences. 2015 ; Vol. 19, No. 4. pp. 1599-1613.
@article{af8447db58d84a0092c6e9dccb6a2f90,
title = "Groundwater surface mapping informs sources of catchment baseflow",
abstract = "Groundwater discharge is a major contributor to stream baseflow. Quantifying this flux is difficult, despite its considerable importance to water resource management and evaluation of the effects of groundwater extraction on streamflow. It is important to be able to differentiate between contributions to streamflow from regional groundwater discharge (more susceptible to groundwater extraction) compared to interflow processes (arguably less susceptible to groundwater extraction). Here we explore the use of groundwater surface mapping as an independent data set to constrain estimates of groundwater discharge to streamflow using traditional digital filter and tracer techniques. We developed groundwater surfaces from 88 monitoring bores using Kriging with external drift and for a subset of 33 bores with shallow screen depths. Baseflow estimates at the catchment outlet were made using the Eckhardt digital filter approach and tracer data mixing analysis using major ion signatures. Our groundwater mapping approach yielded two measures (percentage area intersecting the land surface and monthly change in saturated volume) that indicated that digital filter-derived baseflow significantly exceeded probable groundwater discharge during most months. Tracer analysis was not able to resolve contributions from ungauged tributary flows (sourced from either shallow flow paths, i.e. interflow and perched aquifer discharge, or regional groundwater discharge) and regional groundwater. Groundwater mapping was able to identify ungauged sub-catchments where regional groundwater discharge was too deep to contribute to tributary flow and thus where shallow flow paths dominated the tributary flow. Our results suggest that kriged groundwater surfaces provide a useful, empirical and independent data set for investigating sources of fluxes contributing to baseflow and identifying periods where baseflow analysis may overestimate groundwater discharge to streamflow.",
author = "Costelloe, {J. F.} and Peterson, {T. J.} and K. Halbert and Western, {A. W.} and Mcdonnell, {J. J.}",
note = "This work is funded by the Australian Research Council Discovery Project scheme through project DP120100253. We greatly appreciate the provision of groundwater chemistry data and introduction to the Gellibrand catchment by Alex Atkinson and Ian Cartwright from Monash University. We thank two anonymous reviewers and Ian Cartwright for their insightful and constructive reviews that helped improve this paper.",
year = "2015",
month = "4",
day = "7",
doi = "10.5194/hess-19-1599-2015",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "1599--1613",
journal = "Hydrology and Earth System Sciences",
issn = "1027-5606",
publisher = "Copernicus Gesellschaft mbH",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Groundwater surface mapping informs sources of catchment baseflow

AU - Costelloe, J. F.

AU - Peterson, T. J.

AU - Halbert, K.

AU - Western, A. W.

AU - Mcdonnell, J. J.

N1 - This work is funded by the Australian Research Council Discovery Project scheme through project DP120100253. We greatly appreciate the provision of groundwater chemistry data and introduction to the Gellibrand catchment by Alex Atkinson and Ian Cartwright from Monash University. We thank two anonymous reviewers and Ian Cartwright for their insightful and constructive reviews that helped improve this paper.

PY - 2015/4/7

Y1 - 2015/4/7

N2 - Groundwater discharge is a major contributor to stream baseflow. Quantifying this flux is difficult, despite its considerable importance to water resource management and evaluation of the effects of groundwater extraction on streamflow. It is important to be able to differentiate between contributions to streamflow from regional groundwater discharge (more susceptible to groundwater extraction) compared to interflow processes (arguably less susceptible to groundwater extraction). Here we explore the use of groundwater surface mapping as an independent data set to constrain estimates of groundwater discharge to streamflow using traditional digital filter and tracer techniques. We developed groundwater surfaces from 88 monitoring bores using Kriging with external drift and for a subset of 33 bores with shallow screen depths. Baseflow estimates at the catchment outlet were made using the Eckhardt digital filter approach and tracer data mixing analysis using major ion signatures. Our groundwater mapping approach yielded two measures (percentage area intersecting the land surface and monthly change in saturated volume) that indicated that digital filter-derived baseflow significantly exceeded probable groundwater discharge during most months. Tracer analysis was not able to resolve contributions from ungauged tributary flows (sourced from either shallow flow paths, i.e. interflow and perched aquifer discharge, or regional groundwater discharge) and regional groundwater. Groundwater mapping was able to identify ungauged sub-catchments where regional groundwater discharge was too deep to contribute to tributary flow and thus where shallow flow paths dominated the tributary flow. Our results suggest that kriged groundwater surfaces provide a useful, empirical and independent data set for investigating sources of fluxes contributing to baseflow and identifying periods where baseflow analysis may overestimate groundwater discharge to streamflow.

AB - Groundwater discharge is a major contributor to stream baseflow. Quantifying this flux is difficult, despite its considerable importance to water resource management and evaluation of the effects of groundwater extraction on streamflow. It is important to be able to differentiate between contributions to streamflow from regional groundwater discharge (more susceptible to groundwater extraction) compared to interflow processes (arguably less susceptible to groundwater extraction). Here we explore the use of groundwater surface mapping as an independent data set to constrain estimates of groundwater discharge to streamflow using traditional digital filter and tracer techniques. We developed groundwater surfaces from 88 monitoring bores using Kriging with external drift and for a subset of 33 bores with shallow screen depths. Baseflow estimates at the catchment outlet were made using the Eckhardt digital filter approach and tracer data mixing analysis using major ion signatures. Our groundwater mapping approach yielded two measures (percentage area intersecting the land surface and monthly change in saturated volume) that indicated that digital filter-derived baseflow significantly exceeded probable groundwater discharge during most months. Tracer analysis was not able to resolve contributions from ungauged tributary flows (sourced from either shallow flow paths, i.e. interflow and perched aquifer discharge, or regional groundwater discharge) and regional groundwater. Groundwater mapping was able to identify ungauged sub-catchments where regional groundwater discharge was too deep to contribute to tributary flow and thus where shallow flow paths dominated the tributary flow. Our results suggest that kriged groundwater surfaces provide a useful, empirical and independent data set for investigating sources of fluxes contributing to baseflow and identifying periods where baseflow analysis may overestimate groundwater discharge to streamflow.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84926619772&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5194/hess-19-1599-2015

DO - 10.5194/hess-19-1599-2015

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 1599

EP - 1613

JO - Hydrology and Earth System Sciences

JF - Hydrology and Earth System Sciences

SN - 1027-5606

IS - 4

ER -