Grouping, pooling, and when bigger is better in visual crowding

M. Manassi, Bilge Sayim, M.H. Herzog

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

77 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In crowding, perception of a target is strongly deteriorated by nearby elements. Crowding is often explained by pooling models predicting that adding flankers increases crowding. In contrast, the centroid hypothesis proposes that adding flankers decreases crowding—‘‘bigger is better.’’ In foveal vision, we have recently shown that adding flankers can increase or decrease crowding depending on whether the target groups or ungroups from the flankers. We have further shown how configural effects, such as good and global Gestalt, determine crowding. Foveal and peripheral crowding do not always reveal the same characteristics. Here, we show that the very same grouping and Gestalt results of foveal vision are also found in the periphery. These results can neither be explained by simple pooling nor by centroid models. We discuss when bigger is better and how grouping might shape crowding.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-14
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Vision
Volume12
Issue number13
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2012

Fingerprint

Crowding

Keywords

  • crowding
  • vernier acuity
  • perceptual organization
  • grouping

Cite this

Grouping, pooling, and when bigger is better in visual crowding. / Manassi, M.; Sayim, Bilge; Herzog, M.H.

In: Journal of Vision, Vol. 12, No. 13, 09.2012, p. 1-14.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Manassi, M. ; Sayim, Bilge ; Herzog, M.H. / Grouping, pooling, and when bigger is better in visual crowding. In: Journal of Vision. 2012 ; Vol. 12, No. 13. pp. 1-14.
@article{cfcc12b06d9d49308c6886c1754ef07a,
title = "Grouping, pooling, and when bigger is better in visual crowding",
abstract = "In crowding, perception of a target is strongly deteriorated by nearby elements. Crowding is often explained by pooling models predicting that adding flankers increases crowding. In contrast, the centroid hypothesis proposes that adding flankers decreases crowding—‘‘bigger is better.’’ In foveal vision, we have recently shown that adding flankers can increase or decrease crowding depending on whether the target groups or ungroups from the flankers. We have further shown how configural effects, such as good and global Gestalt, determine crowding. Foveal and peripheral crowding do not always reveal the same characteristics. Here, we show that the very same grouping and Gestalt results of foveal vision are also found in the periphery. These results can neither be explained by simple pooling nor by centroid models. We discuss when bigger is better and how grouping might shape crowding.",
keywords = "crowding, vernier acuity, perceptual organization, grouping",
author = "M. Manassi and Bilge Sayim and M.H. Herzog",
note = "Acknowledgements We would like to thank Keith May and two anonymous reviewers for their useful comments on this manuscript. We thank Marc Repnow for technical support. This work was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) Project ‘‘Basics of visual processing: What crowds in crowding?’’",
year = "2012",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1167/12.10.13",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "1--14",
journal = "Journal of Vision",
issn = "1534-7362",
publisher = "Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Inc.",
number = "13",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Grouping, pooling, and when bigger is better in visual crowding

AU - Manassi, M.

AU - Sayim, Bilge

AU - Herzog, M.H.

N1 - Acknowledgements We would like to thank Keith May and two anonymous reviewers for their useful comments on this manuscript. We thank Marc Repnow for technical support. This work was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) Project ‘‘Basics of visual processing: What crowds in crowding?’’

PY - 2012/9

Y1 - 2012/9

N2 - In crowding, perception of a target is strongly deteriorated by nearby elements. Crowding is often explained by pooling models predicting that adding flankers increases crowding. In contrast, the centroid hypothesis proposes that adding flankers decreases crowding—‘‘bigger is better.’’ In foveal vision, we have recently shown that adding flankers can increase or decrease crowding depending on whether the target groups or ungroups from the flankers. We have further shown how configural effects, such as good and global Gestalt, determine crowding. Foveal and peripheral crowding do not always reveal the same characteristics. Here, we show that the very same grouping and Gestalt results of foveal vision are also found in the periphery. These results can neither be explained by simple pooling nor by centroid models. We discuss when bigger is better and how grouping might shape crowding.

AB - In crowding, perception of a target is strongly deteriorated by nearby elements. Crowding is often explained by pooling models predicting that adding flankers increases crowding. In contrast, the centroid hypothesis proposes that adding flankers decreases crowding—‘‘bigger is better.’’ In foveal vision, we have recently shown that adding flankers can increase or decrease crowding depending on whether the target groups or ungroups from the flankers. We have further shown how configural effects, such as good and global Gestalt, determine crowding. Foveal and peripheral crowding do not always reveal the same characteristics. Here, we show that the very same grouping and Gestalt results of foveal vision are also found in the periphery. These results can neither be explained by simple pooling nor by centroid models. We discuss when bigger is better and how grouping might shape crowding.

KW - crowding

KW - vernier acuity

KW - perceptual organization

KW - grouping

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84870215237&partnerID=MN8TOARS

U2 - 10.1167/12.10.13

DO - 10.1167/12.10.13

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 1

EP - 14

JO - Journal of Vision

JF - Journal of Vision

SN - 1534-7362

IS - 13

ER -