Guidelines and management of mild hypertensive conditions in pregnancy in rural general practices in Scotland: issues of appropriateness and access

Janet Stephen Tucker, Jane Farmer, P. Stimpson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the diagnosis and management of mild non-proteinuric hypertension in pregnancy in rural general practices against guideline recommendations.

Design: Postal survey and telephone interview.

Setting: All 174 designated rural general practices in Scotland. Sample: 171 GPs and 158 midwives responsible for antenatal care stratified by distance from a specialist maternity hospital.

Main outcome measures: Accuracy of diagnosis and appropriateness of management compared with guideline.

Results: At least one respondent replied for 91% (158/174) of rural practices. Response rates were 68% (117/170) for GPs and 77% (121/158) for midwives. Both GP and midwife replied for 46% (80/174) of practices. Most GPs (80%, 87/109) and midwives (63%, 71/113) overdiagnosed the scenario. Intended management was therefore most often referral or admission to specialist hospital (59%, 132/224), both courses of action beyond guideline recommendations. There was an association between distance of practice from specialist maternity hospital and professionals' report of intended referral or admission. Explanatory factors from telephone interviews included a poor knowledge base, cautious risk assessment, and perceived inflexibility of guidelines for remote situations.

Conclusions: There is a lack of accuracy in the diagnosis of a common antenatal problem and intended management is consistent with overdiagnosis. The results suggest that women in rural settings may experience more antenatal referrals and admissions than are clinically appropriate according to the guidelines. At a time of increasing centralisation of maternity services, this could increase inappropriate referrals and increase costs to service and patients. Quality of care may be improved by developing consensual local guidelines with rural maternity care professionals and support maintained skills and confidence in decision making.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)286-290
Number of pages4
JournalQuality & safety in health care
Volume12
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2003

Keywords

  • CONTROLLED TRIAL
  • CARE
  • OBSTETRICIANS
  • WOMEN

Cite this

Guidelines and management of mild hypertensive conditions in pregnancy in rural general practices in Scotland: issues of appropriateness and access. / Tucker, Janet Stephen; Farmer, Jane; Stimpson, P.

In: Quality & safety in health care, Vol. 12, No. 4, 08.2003, p. 286-290.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e28d01c20ea24cccbfe2c8261879a5c4,
title = "Guidelines and management of mild hypertensive conditions in pregnancy in rural general practices in Scotland: issues of appropriateness and access",
abstract = "Objectives: To assess the diagnosis and management of mild non-proteinuric hypertension in pregnancy in rural general practices against guideline recommendations.Design: Postal survey and telephone interview.Setting: All 174 designated rural general practices in Scotland. Sample: 171 GPs and 158 midwives responsible for antenatal care stratified by distance from a specialist maternity hospital.Main outcome measures: Accuracy of diagnosis and appropriateness of management compared with guideline.Results: At least one respondent replied for 91{\%} (158/174) of rural practices. Response rates were 68{\%} (117/170) for GPs and 77{\%} (121/158) for midwives. Both GP and midwife replied for 46{\%} (80/174) of practices. Most GPs (80{\%}, 87/109) and midwives (63{\%}, 71/113) overdiagnosed the scenario. Intended management was therefore most often referral or admission to specialist hospital (59{\%}, 132/224), both courses of action beyond guideline recommendations. There was an association between distance of practice from specialist maternity hospital and professionals' report of intended referral or admission. Explanatory factors from telephone interviews included a poor knowledge base, cautious risk assessment, and perceived inflexibility of guidelines for remote situations.Conclusions: There is a lack of accuracy in the diagnosis of a common antenatal problem and intended management is consistent with overdiagnosis. The results suggest that women in rural settings may experience more antenatal referrals and admissions than are clinically appropriate according to the guidelines. At a time of increasing centralisation of maternity services, this could increase inappropriate referrals and increase costs to service and patients. Quality of care may be improved by developing consensual local guidelines with rural maternity care professionals and support maintained skills and confidence in decision making.",
keywords = "CONTROLLED TRIAL, CARE, OBSTETRICIANS, WOMEN",
author = "Tucker, {Janet Stephen} and Jane Farmer and P. Stimpson",
year = "2003",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1136/qhc.12.4.286",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "286--290",
journal = "Quality & safety in health care",
issn = "1475-3898",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Guidelines and management of mild hypertensive conditions in pregnancy in rural general practices in Scotland: issues of appropriateness and access

AU - Tucker, Janet Stephen

AU - Farmer, Jane

AU - Stimpson, P.

PY - 2003/8

Y1 - 2003/8

N2 - Objectives: To assess the diagnosis and management of mild non-proteinuric hypertension in pregnancy in rural general practices against guideline recommendations.Design: Postal survey and telephone interview.Setting: All 174 designated rural general practices in Scotland. Sample: 171 GPs and 158 midwives responsible for antenatal care stratified by distance from a specialist maternity hospital.Main outcome measures: Accuracy of diagnosis and appropriateness of management compared with guideline.Results: At least one respondent replied for 91% (158/174) of rural practices. Response rates were 68% (117/170) for GPs and 77% (121/158) for midwives. Both GP and midwife replied for 46% (80/174) of practices. Most GPs (80%, 87/109) and midwives (63%, 71/113) overdiagnosed the scenario. Intended management was therefore most often referral or admission to specialist hospital (59%, 132/224), both courses of action beyond guideline recommendations. There was an association between distance of practice from specialist maternity hospital and professionals' report of intended referral or admission. Explanatory factors from telephone interviews included a poor knowledge base, cautious risk assessment, and perceived inflexibility of guidelines for remote situations.Conclusions: There is a lack of accuracy in the diagnosis of a common antenatal problem and intended management is consistent with overdiagnosis. The results suggest that women in rural settings may experience more antenatal referrals and admissions than are clinically appropriate according to the guidelines. At a time of increasing centralisation of maternity services, this could increase inappropriate referrals and increase costs to service and patients. Quality of care may be improved by developing consensual local guidelines with rural maternity care professionals and support maintained skills and confidence in decision making.

AB - Objectives: To assess the diagnosis and management of mild non-proteinuric hypertension in pregnancy in rural general practices against guideline recommendations.Design: Postal survey and telephone interview.Setting: All 174 designated rural general practices in Scotland. Sample: 171 GPs and 158 midwives responsible for antenatal care stratified by distance from a specialist maternity hospital.Main outcome measures: Accuracy of diagnosis and appropriateness of management compared with guideline.Results: At least one respondent replied for 91% (158/174) of rural practices. Response rates were 68% (117/170) for GPs and 77% (121/158) for midwives. Both GP and midwife replied for 46% (80/174) of practices. Most GPs (80%, 87/109) and midwives (63%, 71/113) overdiagnosed the scenario. Intended management was therefore most often referral or admission to specialist hospital (59%, 132/224), both courses of action beyond guideline recommendations. There was an association between distance of practice from specialist maternity hospital and professionals' report of intended referral or admission. Explanatory factors from telephone interviews included a poor knowledge base, cautious risk assessment, and perceived inflexibility of guidelines for remote situations.Conclusions: There is a lack of accuracy in the diagnosis of a common antenatal problem and intended management is consistent with overdiagnosis. The results suggest that women in rural settings may experience more antenatal referrals and admissions than are clinically appropriate according to the guidelines. At a time of increasing centralisation of maternity services, this could increase inappropriate referrals and increase costs to service and patients. Quality of care may be improved by developing consensual local guidelines with rural maternity care professionals and support maintained skills and confidence in decision making.

KW - CONTROLLED TRIAL

KW - CARE

KW - OBSTETRICIANS

KW - WOMEN

U2 - 10.1136/qhc.12.4.286

DO - 10.1136/qhc.12.4.286

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 286

EP - 290

JO - Quality & safety in health care

JF - Quality & safety in health care

SN - 1475-3898

IS - 4

ER -